My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_990811
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1999
>
pm_990811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:35:39 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/11/1999
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />9. standard language - ok <br />10. Rhody - how is this different from #6? Paschke: discussed <br /> <br />Rhody: development committee in their review may request/require additional terms or conditions. <br /> <br />Klausing: clearly "in addition to meeting all the requirements set above, the DRC may set additional terms and <br />conditions" <br /> <br />Rhody: diagram the track applicant has to take steps to be taken- staff will draft <br /> <br />Egli: add condition: "a flag lot shall be at least 11,000 sf not including the portion of the lot adjoining the public right <br />of way that is less than 40% of the required minimum width of R1 single family lot" ---- condition to added between <br />#5 &6. <br /> <br />Paschke: we can take and work on it and insert where applicable. <br /> <br />Rhody: motion to table action on Item 6a (list) to September 8, 1999. <br /> <br />Second: Olson <br /> <br />Klausing: draft back with changes. Paschke: minutes done & put together new proposed ordinance well in advance <br />for additional comments and text changes so by 9/8 we can consider. <br /> <br />Klausing: #4: assessed... .Paschke = will note to Dennis. <br /> <br />All in favor <br /> <br />(Rhody: Sentence: "The flag lot is created... " to front of Fkag Lot definition. <br /> <br />Klausing: Add: "Flag lot created is created by dividing an R1 parcel into two buildable lots" - so only R1) <br /> <br />Break... <br /> <br />Outdoor Sales and Signage - Klausing: informational purposes only <br /> <br />Paschke: will go directly to city council. <br /> <br />Olson: Section 2, second to last sentence: (correction 12-day temporary sale) <br /> <br />Klausing: Section 5: limit on this per year? <br /> <br />Egli: 3rd line Sect 2 covers this - up to 12 calendar days per year. <br /> <br />Paschke: one is temporary and one seasonal. <br /> <br />Klausing: requirement on setback requirements? Encroaching? Paschke will check. Sect 5: if I were applicant would have <br />a hard time determining outside vs. inside sales. <br /> <br />No other comments. <br /> <br />Council - 24 Hour Study: <br /> <br />Paschke: Council action taken to include odor issues in study by DSU. <br /> <br />No questions. <br /> <br />College Properties PUD Amendment. Paschke: not hotel but 4-story office structure (currently old gas station on site) - <br />will come to Planning Com in Sept. Proposal is larger than initially proposed - so need an amendment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.