Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Roseville <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Wednesday, October 13,1999 <br /> <br />1. Call to Order <br /> <br />Chair Klausing called the regular meeting of the City of Roseville Planning Commission to order at 6:30 p.m. in the City <br />Council Chambers. <br />2. Roll Call and Introduction <br />Present: <br /> <br />Absent: <br />Staff present: <br />3. Approval of Minutes <br /> <br />Chair Craig Klausing, Peggy Egli, Janet Olson, Ed <br />Cunningham, Doug Wilke, James Mulder, John Rhody <br />none <br />Deb Bloom, Thomas Paschke, Pat Morrison <br /> <br />Motion: Member Cunningham moved, seconded by Member Wilke, to approve the minutes of the September 8, 1999 <br />meeting of the Planning Commission as submitted with the following correction. Page 11, line 10: strike 8-ie4, insert failed. <br /> <br />Ayes: 6, Klausing, Egli, Olson, Cunningham, Wilke, Mulder <br /> <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />Abstain: Rhody (not present at 09.08.99 meeting) <br /> <br />4. Communications from the Public <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />5. Consent Agenda <br /> <br />None <br />6. Public Hearings <br /> <br />6a. Planning File 3140: Charles Kadrie, 1281 Josephine Road, is requesting a variance to reduce the deck setback from <br />the Lake Josephine lakeshore with a maximum allowable three (3) foot maintenance deck attached to the north wall. <br /> <br />Chair Klausing opened the public hearing for the request and asked Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the <br />project report dated October 13, 1999. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke defined the request for a variance from Section 1 016.22C to reduce the required 75-foot shoreland <br />setback to allow construction of a three-foot wide maintenance deck across the front face of the home at 1281 Josephine <br />Road. He discussed the background and history of this site, including the 1993 and 1996 court actions relative to the <br />existing deck. <br /> <br />After review of the staff comments and findings, he advised staff recommended approval based on the findings as <br />outlined in the report dated October 13, 1999. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Comments: <br /> <br />Chair Klausing requested clarification of which test to apply in consideration of this variance request; Thomas Paschke <br />advised the request did not meet many of the conditions required in Section 1016.22C. <br /> <br />Member Olson asked how city could insure the existing deck would be removed; Thomas Paschke advised this could be a <br />