Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ayes: 5 <br /> <br />Nays: 0 <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked for more details on why the proposal is the "one best" design. Explore expansion in other <br />configurations and feasibilities. More details are needed regarding future phases. <br /> <br />Member Egli expressed concern regarding noise and neighborhood issues and design flexibility to redirect the noise away <br />from neighbor or better noise mitigation. She favored continuing the issue and looking for another design. <br /> <br />Chair Klausing liked the reduced grades, turning the structure, using earth for berms. <br /> <br />Member Wilke asked Midland Hills to meet with neighbors and complete their plans. <br /> <br />Member Rhody noted the design ignores the neighborhood. They must meet with neighbors to understand concerns. <br /> <br />6d. Planning File 3172. A request by the City of Roseville to consider a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Business <br />and High Density to Park and a rezoning from R-3A, B-1 and R-1 (Single Family Residential), property generally located <br />at the southwest corner of Lexington Avenue and County Road B (currently known as Lexington Park). <br /> <br />Chair Klausing opened the hearing and requested the City Planner, Thomas Paschke, to provide a verbal summary of the <br />staff report dated January 12, 2000. He described the changes proposed in the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning <br />designations for the site. The purpose is to expand the area of Lexington Park to an 8-acre neighborhood and community <br />park. <br /> <br />Bob Bierscheid, Roseville Parks and Recreation Director, explained the history of the Park. He noted that in December <br />1999 the City Council declared its intention to make the site one park, to amend the park system plan and to amend the <br />Comprehensive Plan and zoning maps. <br /> <br />The Park and Recreation Commission, in January 2000, recommended that the Park System Plan be modified to include <br />the entire site as a "community" park, which is a "neighborhood" park, but larger and with more specialized activities or <br />amenities. Because of its location, it will be a focal point for the community. He described the park sites within Planning <br />District 13, which are small and are better balanced with this 8-acre site. This park will also be an accessible community <br />pathway hub along Lexington and County Road B. <br /> <br />Mr. Bierscheid described the park design proposal process. <br /> <br />Chair Klausing asked what the "charge" to the Planning Commission was (change site to all park zoning). <br /> <br />Chair Klausing asked why the site should be eight acres instead of six acres. Mr. Bierscheid explained the need for eight <br />acres to create a community park. <br /> <br />Chair Klausing asked if there was a need for a community park in the area. Bob Bierscheid explained the Park and <br />Recreation Commission reasoning for a community park at this site. <br /> <br />Member Egli asked if the site (8 acres) was owned by the City (yes). She asked what the expected costs would be. Bob <br />Bierscheid explained the improvement costs to be approximately $500,000. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained the change in the maps of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning. Dennis Welsch noted that <br />the original Comprehensive Plan recommendation by the Planning Commission (1994) was to designate the entire site for <br />park. <br /> <br />Public Comments: <br /> <br />Patricia Johnson, 2986 Mildred Drive, supported the concept of all park designation. She explained the history of the site <br />from 1897 (school) to present. She explained the many uses that have been considered for this site. She recommended <br />approval. <br /> <br />Dave Jaehne, lives adjacent to the park (corner of Eldridge and Lindy). He explained the need for the park. He asked why <br />