pm_000209 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

home; and 280 feet from the adjacent (southeast) residential home. He stated the existing structure is 80 feet in width as it faces to the east. Mr. Paschke identified the proposed structure to be set back 140 feet from the east property line; 155 feet from the west curb of Midland Hills Road; 200 feet from the adjacent (east) residential property line; 285 feet from the adjacent (east) residential home; and 332 feet from the adjacent (southeast) residential home. Mr. Paschke also indicated the proposed clubhouse has a minimum of four width changes that face east. He stated the width of the structure is 60 feet in width at the closest point to the property line and 132 feet at the structures greatest width. Mr. Paschke described the site plan, building design and roadway realignments. The proposal currently has a 32-foot height. A revised grading plan has been completed for the site (but was not in the packet). Landscaping has changed to screen activities and more of the parking and driveway areas. The parking lot lighting plan has yet to be developed, but must meet the City Code. Staff recommended approval with conditions. Member Olson asked for clarification of the golf cart parking spaces (lower level of the building). What will the chain-linked area be used for? What is yellow building (maintenance)? Member Egli asked what the decibel level of a diesel truck would be at an adjacent house. (No answer, except 85 dbl at 50 feet, declining by approximately 3 dbl every additional 50 feet) Chair Klausing asked for details of the parking lot lighting design and the needs for downcast, shoebox fixtures. Chair Klausing asked for details on the photometric plan and whether staff measures light on the site (no). He asked for clarification of the term "fixed windows". Rick Christensen, architect for the Country Club, explained the lighting plan and the % foot-candle measure that would be at the edge of the driveway and parking lot area. Mr. Christensen explained the grading and berm adjacent to the east side of the project. The drainage will be handled by the existing parking lot, and adjacent drainage areas. He also explained the one level design and the efficiencies of service. He noted that the Club would continue to have seven trucks delivering each day. Mr. Christensen explained the design features of the exterior of the building. The height is 32 feet; the east portion of the building will have a 27-foot height. He noted that noise from a dance band would be less audible from the new building. A memo from sound expert David Braslau was distributed. The service area and parking area redesign were discussed. Member Olson asked for details of outdoor storage in the southwest corner of the site, materials that are now to be moved indoors. Member Cunningham asked for details of the northeast corner of the building, including the screen wall and berming at the edge of the patio. The size of trees will block the view of the screen wall. Member Cunningham asked if the out building adjacent to Walsh Lake would remain (yes) and whether expansion in that direction had been considered. He asked if there was underground fuel storage. Member Wilke asked for details of the drainage plan. Assistant City Engineer, Deb Bloom stated the City will be reviewing the new grading and drainage plan, and ponding where necessary. Run-off cannot drain onto adjacent properties. Member Wilke noted that the staff reports state in condition 3.14 does not set specific standards for future improvements. Blanton Bessinger, President, Midland Hills Country Club, noted that the redesign is to update the site conditions and aesthetics. The pool could be located on the southeast, southwest or west side in the future, not on the east side of the building. The Club has been an asset to Roseville; the Club is attempting to stay viable with this addition. Member Cunningham asked if, in the future, the east side of the site is deemed best for outdoor facilities, could the neighbors use the facilities? (The Club will work with the neighbors at that time). Chair Klausing asked if truck delivery (7/day) will increase from existing (no). How much closer is new delivery to property line (120 to 140 feet)? Why is building so close to residence on east? (Putting greens, greens and dining areas are fixed, cannot move building closer and still maintain views).