Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Member Mulder asked if Ramsey County could be prohibited from bringing material from other sites and 1-15 day period <br />per year (yes). <br /> <br />Member Olson asked if Ramsey County could respond to the staff report and conditions (yes). <br /> <br />Motion: Member Wilke moved, seconded by Member Mulder, to recommend approval of the Ramsey County and City of <br />Roseville request for an Interim Use Permit to allow a concrete recycling operation on Ramsey County's Kent Street Yard, <br />as per sections 4.4, 4.5, 4.6 of the staff report dated March 8, 2000, and further, that no other material from other sites in <br />the County would be brought to the Kent Street site for stockpiling or crushing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Egli moved, seconded by Member Mulder, to amend the motion by including conditions 5 and 6 from the <br />February 3, 2000 letter from Daniel Soler, Ramsey County: 5) The City will provide to the County a mailing list which will <br />be used for notification of these operations. The County shall notify those on the list at least five days prior to when each <br />operation commences; 6) The County will take periodic noise measurements during each operation and during other <br />times as deemed necessary by the County or as requested by the City. <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br /> <br />Nays: 1 (Olson) <br /> <br />Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Rhody, to request the County to provide the City with addresses <br />for notification to residents in St. Paul to a radius of 1500 feet from the crushing site. <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br /> <br />Nays: 1 (Olson) <br /> <br />Member Olson stated her concern was that the County was not present, whether it can be done in two years and whether <br />the County can use all the material at the site. <br /> <br />Motion, adopted as amended. <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br /> <br />Nays: 1 (Olson) <br /> <br />Gd. Planning File 3190. A request by the City of Roseville to amend Section 1009 (Sign Regulations) and 1014 <br />(Administration) of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />Chair Klausing opened the continued hearing. Joel Jamnik explained the issues related to the proposed flag and sign <br />code. The Zoning Committee consensus was that commercial messages on flags would be counted as part of the <br />allowable signage per lot, whereas flags with non-commercial messages would not be counted. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Wilke, to continue the hearing to April 12, 2000 meeting. <br /> <br />Ayes: 7 <br /> <br />Nays: 0 <br /> <br />7. Presentations and Other Actions <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />8. Information, Reports and Other Business <br /> <br />8a. Twin Lakes EPA Grant Update. <br /> <br />Twin Lakes Parkway Report was received. <br /> <br />8b. By-Laws/Absences. <br />