pm_010110 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mr. Robert Witt stated the existing garage would be resided. To remove it would require removal of trees. He does propose removal of the boathouse. Chair Klausing asked for details of the shared driveway. Mr. Witt said a new shared driveway would be constructed. Member Olson noted that the MnDNR asked that trees be placed between the shore and house (five new trees will be planted). Member Wilke asked the height of the house (1 % stories). There were no comments from the public. The hearing was closed. Motion: Chair Klausing moved, second by Member Olson, to recommend adoption of Resolution #3279 (an executed copy of which is attached), with findings and conditions A through I, as outlined in said Resolution. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. e. Planning File 3280: A request by Peter Vesterholt, 699 Heinel Circle, for a 5 and 23 foot variance from Section 1004.02D (Minimum Yard Requirements) of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance to allow construction of an attached garage into the required side and front yard (street side) setback. Chairman Craig Klausing opened the public hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the project report dated January 10, 2001. Thomas Paschke provided a description of the garage expansion project. He explained the 10' setback requirements and the MnDNR support for granting the variance. The applicant did not create the hardship; the use is pre-existing; the garage adds livability and accessibility; the setback is similar to other setbacks in the area. Platted in 1949, the lot is non-conforming with the house so close to the front property line (15 feet). The street was reconstructed and moved further from the house leaving a large right-of-way boulevard. City Code Section 602 requires parking on private property, not in boulevards without a variance or permit. Staff recommended approval with conditions A through E of the project report dated January 10, 2001. Mr. Vesterholt explained the expansion and the benefit of removing the front storage shed. No further public comment was offered; the public hearing was closed. Motion: Member Klausing moved, second by Member Rhody, to recommend approval of Resolution #3280 with amendment to add Section 602 and conditions A through E of said Resolution (an executed copy of which is attached). Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. f. Planning File 3284: A request by Charles Kadrie and ATP Minneapolis, Inc. for a conditional use permit to allow the installation of a wireless telecommunication antenna on the roof of the Roseville Professional Center, 2233 North Hamline Avenue. Chairman Craig Klausing opened the public hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the staff report dated January 10, 2001. Thomas Paschke explained the City Code requirements for commercial receiving or transmitting antennas. He noted the Roseville Library expressed concern for fear of interference (letter of January 9,2001). The proposal would add more support for existing antennas operated by VoiceStream Wireless. The installation includes equipment cabinets on the roof of the building. Each proposed antenna support unit could hold up to four antennas. (Existing antennas are attached to the penthouse walls instead of separate antenna structures.)