Laserfiche WebLink
<br />details by staff follow-up. <br /> <br />Motion: Motion by Chair Klausing, second by Member Wilke, to recommend approval of the ATP Minneapolis's request <br />for a conditional use permit to allow the installation of three wireless communication antenna (one on north building <br />fac;ade and two free standing on the building roof at the southeast and southwest corners) and an associated equipment <br />platform and cabinet area by VoiceStream, at the Roseville Professional Building, 2233 Hamline Avenue North, based on <br />the findings in Section 3 of the project report dated January 10, 2001 and with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1) The north facing antenna(s) shall be installed on the roof of the Roseville Professional Building (not penthouse or <br />penthouse roof). <br /> <br />2) The maximum height of the antenna support units and antenna located in the southwest and southeast building <br />corners, upon full installation, shall be eight feet above the building roof height. <br /> <br />3) The maximum height of the equipment platform and cabinets, upon full installation, shall be eight feet above the roof <br />height. <br /> <br />4) The ATP request, on behalf of VoiceStream, shall be limited to three antenna support units, each having a maximum of <br />four antennas. <br /> <br />5) The equipment platform shall be limited to six equipment cabinets. Five will be 30 inches wide by 40 inches deep by 5 <br />feet tall and one cabinet will be 2 feet wide by 2 feet deep by 5 feet tall. <br /> <br />6) The antenna support units and equipment cabinets shall be limited to the single user (VoiceStream) and the applicant <br />ATP Minneapolis. Future antenna additions shall require a revised CUP. <br /> <br />7) The antenna units and equipment cabinets shall not be lighted. Electric and phone wires serving the equipment and <br />antenna units shall be mounted to the building roof. <br /> <br />8) The antenna units, equipment platform, and supporting cabinets shall be completely removed from the site by the <br />applicant (A TP Minneapolis) after operations cease, or if the equipment is damaged or unsafe as determined by the <br />Roseville Building Official, or if the CUP elapses or if the use is determined to be in violation of the CUP or City Code by <br />the Community Development Director. The City may require the applicant (ATP Minneapolis) to post a bond to assure <br />timely removal of the antenna units and supporting equipment. <br /> <br />9) Parking of maintenance vehicle(s) shall occur in an off-street parking space of the parking lot affiliated with the <br />Roseville Professional Building. <br /> <br />10) The color of the antenna, antenna support units, equipment platform, and equipment cabinets shall be of a similar <br />color (white) to that of the principal structure. <br /> <br />11) This conditional use permit shall expire 6 months after approval if a building permit has not been issued. (Section <br />1013.03) <br /> <br />Ayes: 5 <br /> <br />Nays: 0 <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />1. Planning File 3270: (Continued from December 13) A request by the City of Roseville to amend Section 1004.01 A <br />(Accessory Buildings in Residential Districts) for the purpose of clarifying rear yard area and square footage <br />maximums. <br /> <br />Chairman Craig Klausing opened the public hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal <br />summary of the staff report dated January 10, 2001. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained the criteria in existing ordinances and the need to be more specific and add clarity. The <br />Zoning Committee, City Attorney and staff have reviewed the proposed ordinance. The new ordinance explains what can <br />be allowed for accessory buildings. Member Olson asked for details on overall area for principal structures, utilizing only <br />the house footprint to calculate area for attached or detached buildings. To exceed size, a variance would be required. <br /> <br />Member Olson asked if new larger buildings should have larger setbacks. Thomas Paschke suggested conditions be <br />