Laserfiche WebLink
<br />c. Planning File 3304: Overbye request for a 20 foot Variance from Section 703.04B1a for property at 2916 West <br />Owasso Boulevard. <br /> <br />Chair Rhody opened the hearing and requested Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the staff report <br />dated June 12, 2001. <br /> <br />John Overbye is requesting a 20-foot variance from Section 703.04B1 a of the City Code to allow a driveway apron <br />in the public right-of-way to be increased from the required 26-foot maximum width to a width of 46 feet. <br /> <br />The proposed reduction of this setback will enable Mr. Overbye to retain his driveway in approximately its current <br />location. There is need to get around the garage to the house. <br /> <br />The three findings recommended by the staff included: <br />A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official <br />controls: Mr. Zaun currently has a 32-foot wide apron that provides access to the detached garage (directly <br />adjacent to West Owasso Boulevard) and driveway that extends towards the home which provides access <br />and parking. Requiring an apron modification consistent with the City Code (26 feet in width) would <br />prevenUcritically limit access to the home and off-street parking. <br />B. The plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the land owner: <br />The City's Pavement Management Program and the reconstruction of West Owasso Boulevard has required <br />Mr. Zaun to apply for a variance if he wants the existing (or similar) driveway apron width to remain. Mr. <br />Zaun's driveway improvements were constructed prior to the City having a maximum apron width <br />requirement for the public right-of-way. <br />C. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: The proposed six-foot variance <br />to the required apron width in a public right-of-way will not alter the essential character or the locality, nor <br />adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. <br /> <br />Staff recommended approval. <br /> <br />Chair Rhody closed the hearing since Mr. Overbye had no additional information. He accepted the staff report. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Rhody moved, second by Member Wilke, to recommend approval of the request by John <br />Overbye for a 20 foot variance to Section 703.04B1 a of the Roseville City Code to allow an increase in the required <br />driveway apron with in a public right-of-way from 26 feet to 46 feet for property located at 2916 West Owasso <br />Boulevard, based on the findings in Section 3 of the project report dated June 12, 2001. <br /> <br />Ayes: Rhody, Wilke, Olson, Traynor, Cunningham, Duncan <br /> <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />Motion carried 6-0. <br /> <br />d. Planning File 3306: Marchek request for an 18 foot Variance from section 703.04B4 for property at 2995 West <br />Owasso Boulevard. <br /> <br />Chair Rhody opened the hearing and requested Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the staff report <br />dated June 12, 2001. <br /> <br />Steven Marchek is requesting an 18-foot variance from Section 703.04B4 of the City Code to allow a driveway <br />apron (in the public right-of-way) to be within the required setback from a street corner property line. Mr. Marchek's <br />current driveway is located 12 feet from the property line adjacent to Brenner Avenue and the Code requires a <br />setback of 30 feet. <br /> <br />This approval would allow Mr. Marchek to retain the driveway in its current location. Mrs. Marchek stated she <br />supported the staff report. <br /> <br />The three findings recommended by the staff included: <br />A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official <br />controls: Mr. Zaun currently has a 32-foot wide apron that provides access to the detached garage (directly <br />adjacent to West Owasso Boulevard) and driveway that extends towards the home which provides access <br />and parking. Requiring an apron modification consistent with the City Code (26 feet in width) would <br />prevenUcritically limit access to the home and off-street parking. <br />B. The plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the land owner: <br />