My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_010808
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2001
>
pm_010808
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:36:00 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/8/2001
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />6. Public Hearings <br /> <br />(a) Planning File 3329: A request by Kathleen Agness for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning (from R-1 to <br />B-1) to change the former Rymer Academy (allowed through a special use permit) to an office use. The property is <br />located at 2256 Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />Chair Rhody opened the hearing and requested Dennis Welsch to provide a verbal summary of the project report dated <br />August 8, 2001. <br /> <br />Dennis explained that staff and applicant had agreed on August 8, 2001 to request a continuance of this application to the <br />September 12th Planning Commission meeting to allow for correction in the staff report. Welsch apologized for the <br />minimal detail and inconsistencies in the report requiring the continuance. <br /> <br />Roger Dunnette, 1085 W. Sherren, whose property directly abuts south of the Rymer property line, provided a letter dated <br />August 8,2001 (attached) and verbal report. Mr. Dunnette recommended denial because rezoning to business (B-1) <br />zoning opens the door for other uses which are not compatible with R-1 zone. He expressed concern with property <br />values, which he felt would decline. <br /> <br />Mr. Dunnette said he, his wife, and Mrs. Goodroad, 1075 W. Sherren, did not support the rezoning, but would support a <br />special use permit for the realtor office. <br /> <br />Mr. Dunnette said he was concerned about the exterior use or change of the site based on possible paving of the front <br />yard. <br /> <br />Sally Goodroad, 1075 W. Sherren, directly east of the Rymer building has submitted two letters concerning the use, the <br />last dated August 8. She said the former owner, Mr. Rymer, said the Special Use Permit was to revert to residential uses <br />if the use closed or Mr. Rymer died. Having a rezoning to B-1 would have an effect on her property value and she <br />expressed concern about uses and nuisances. She recommended a residential use. <br /> <br />Terry Gardner, 2261 Lexington Avenue North, concurred with Mr. Dunnette. He said he was concerned with the lighted <br />sign in a residential property and changes in the landscaping for visibility. He did not attend the neighborhood meeting. <br /> <br />Janet Olson asked if the signs were illuminated (Yes). <br /> <br />Cindy Gardner, 2261 Lexington Avenue North, explained the Rymer building had to be a residential use and someone <br />who would have to live in the building. She expressed concern regarding the rezoning because it allowed other uses. <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked how Ms. Gardner knew about the permit for Rymer (realtor and neighbors had told them). <br /> <br />Kathy Mueller, 2255 Lexington Avenue North, was opposed to rezoning, did not like the business within a house. <br />Lexington Avenue now has new park and neighborhood is being updated; does not want the street to look like Rice <br />Street. She explained past attempt to change the use in the house adjacent to her house. The Rymer site now needs <br />grass cutting and weed removal. The sign shines into the residential windows on the west side of Lexington. <br /> <br />Member Duncan asked if Lexington should look like Grand Avenue; would Ms. Mueller like that? (she did not like the <br />redevelopment on Grand Avenue). <br /> <br />Ms. Kathleen Agness, 2256 Lexington, said neighbors did not want a gasoline station. From her perspective, the Rymer <br />site has been a business for 40 years. The rear yard is a paved lot. Nothing will change inside the house. The lighted sign <br />can be changed. She trimmed the vegetation to look nice, adding new bushes. It will take two to three years to remove <br />weeds. The house should remain a business. She spoke of the uses that could not be established by the lot size. Nice <br />houses in the area and freeway access are reasons for a business on the site. Rymer was a business, which had lessons <br />and sales of equipment. Her business would be week days, 8am to 5pm, not comparable to 400 vehicles per week from <br />the Rymer Academy. <br /> <br />Eric Mueller, 2255 Lexington, opposed the rezoning; the house should go back to a residential use. His neighbor has a <br />paved backyard, which allows turn-arounds for Lexington. <br /> <br />Cindy Gardner, 2261 Lexington Avenue, said that her house, located on a lot adjacent to Highway 36, is not difficult to live <br />in - traffic and noise are acceptable. <br /> <br />Sarah Waxon, 2237 Lexington Avenue, concurred with the opponents. By retaining a business, the site retains more <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.