pm_020605 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Member Bakeman asked how much of the lot is buildable. Thomas Paschke stated at least one-third of the site is buildable. Could the lot be split? (No). Member Duncan stated there are four new houses in the area - to the east -, which have three car garages. There being no further discussion, Chair Duncan closed the hearing. Member Mulder stated he was concerned with the size of the structure and the odd situation. The second building is significant; there will be three on the site. The existing 18 x 25 shed is larger than most one-car garages, in addition to the proposed three-car garage. Member Cunningham asked if an 860 sq.ft. structure was able to house three cars (Yes). Thomas Paschke explained allowable rear building area and, as an alternative, an attached three-car garage which could be built without a variance. Member Mulder stated the second building frustrated him. Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Duncan, to recommend approval of a 171 square foot variance from Section 1 004.01A4 to allow construction of a detached accessory building 840 square feet in size in the rear yard adjacent to the principal structure for property located at 1055 Shryer Avenue, based on the comments and findings in Section 4 and 5 of the project report dated June 5, 2002. Member Mulder noted that no other (third) accessory structure would be allowed. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Duncan, to recommend approval of a conditional use permit to allow construction of a 30 foot by 28 foot (840 sq. ft.) detached accessory building (parcel total of 1,299 square feet) in the rear yard adjacent to the principal structure of property located at 1055 Shryer Avenue, based on the comments and findings in Section 4 and 5, and the conditions stipulated in Section 7 of the project report dated June 5, 2002, and noted that no other (third) accessory structure would be allowed. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried d. Planning File 3399: Request by Robert Lindholm for a variance to exceed the 30% lot coverage requirement of Section 1 004.01A6 of the Roseville City Code for property located at 2959 Matilda Street. Chairman Duncan opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke provide a summary of the project report dated June 5, 2002. Robert Lindholm has submitted an application for a 533 square foot or 5% percent variance to Section 1004.01A6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) to allow the construction of a 864 square foot detached accessory structure (garage) in the rear yard adjacent to the home and slightly expand the driveway by matching into the existing driveway with a two foot wide by 24 foot wide (48 sq.ft.) apron. The house was constructed in 1963 on the 90-foot by 122 foot or 10,980 square foot parcel; the principal structure and tuck-under garage have a footprint size (based on applicant site plan information) of 55 feet by 25 feet or 1,375 square feet. The tuck under garage is estimated (City Staff) to be 16 feet deep by 25 feet wide or 400 square feet and is proposed to be converted into living space. Thomas Paschke explained the variance requirements and hardship on the site. Staff recommended approval with conditions.