My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_021106
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2002
>
pm_021106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:36:04 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/6/2002
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />District (Section 1005.07) pertaining to clarifying languages and uses. <br /> <br />Chair Duncan opened the hearing and requested the City Planner provide a summary of the project report dated <br />November 6, 2002. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke advised that in December 2001 , the City of Roseville adopted the new B-6 Mixed Use Office Park <br />zoning district text. Since then there have been a series of discussions with properties owners and attorneys about <br />the permitted uses and the non-conforming uses allowed by the new text. It was clear from those discussions that <br />the December 2001 ordinance to describe these permitted uses was not complete, nor flexible enough. He <br />indicated that the staff prepared an update to the language which adds the permitted uses. The ordinance does not <br />deal with the issue of pre-existing non-conforming uses which, at a later time, will be dealt with in all zoning <br />districts, not just the B-6 zone. <br /> <br />Member Mulder reiterated his concern that "big box retail" may move into Twin Lakes area. Thomas Paschke <br />advised any action would need to meet Master Plan criteria, and processed under the PUD concept and be <br />reviewed by the Planning Commission and council. Member Mulder asked that Thomas get back to him on this <br />matter. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed terminology and definition of "limited retail". <br /> <br />Member Traynor questioned (line 6, b2) terminology "with warehousing". Thomas Paschke indicated that many <br />times a product is produced and storage of this product is necessary. <br /> <br />Commission questioned word "high tech". <br /> <br />There being no further comments, the Chair closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval, as amended, of <br />the proposed "use" amendments to the B-6, "Mixed Use Business Park District" as consistent with the <br />purpose and intent of the Comprehensive land Use Plan definition and designation. <br /> <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />-----Ten Minute Recess ----- <br /> <br />7. Information, Reports & Other Business <br />a. PF3448 Sketch Proposal, 1910 County Road C <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke presented a concept site plan by Abra Auto Body and Glass for a new office/warehouse building <br />at 1910 County Road C. Kathy Showalter, of Planscape, presented the sketch. <br /> <br />The proposal indicates an 18,000 square foot Abra Auto Body and an 8,000 square foot office/warehouse building. <br />She pointed out the parking area and traffic flow. Thomas Paschke indicated that discussion had taken place with <br />the DRC relative to storm water management, fencing, building materials, etc. <br /> <br />Member Mulder stated he was not comfortable acting on a proposal that was not sent with the packet material. <br /> <br />Jim Diamond and Kathy Schwa Iter responded to the Commission's questions as to design of building (in <br />comparison to Twin Lakes buildings), storm water runoff and snow storage, visibility of vehicles overnight parking, <br />where fencing would be placed, egress of the parcel/service road issues(before and after County Road C <br />Streetscape project). <br /> <br />b. Planning Commission Meeting(s) and Other Matters. <br /> <br />1. Member Mulder advised he would like to have a Planning Commission <br />meeting for a discussion of new challenges within fully developed communities. He suggested an expert be brought <br />in to give the Commission guidance on current and future issues. Member Stone discussed St. Louis Park process. <br />It was suggested the Council be invited. <br /> <br />2. January 2003 meeting: The Planning Commission unanimously approved a meeting date of Wednesday, <br />January 8, 2003 as the official January meeting. <br /> <br />3. Zoning Study Meeting: The next study meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 19 from 5pm-7pm. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.