pm_031105 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Motion carried. c. Planning File 3532: Request by City of Roseville to amend the text of Business Zoning Districts within City Code Section 1005.. Chair Mulder opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke present a verbal summary of the staff report dated November 5, 2003. The Commission reviewed the proposed changes (strike-outs and underlines) and the use of charts for dimensions and uses allowed in business districts. Member Bakeman requested that "night watchman's residences within businesses" be eliminated as old language, now electronic security systems are used. The Commission decided more time was needed to review. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, second by Member Stone, to continue the review of the proposed amendments to City Code Title 10, Chapter 1005, Sections 1005.01 through 1005.09 to the December 3, 2003 meeting. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Motion carried d. Planning File 3528: Request by the City of Roseville to amend text of the Shopping Center Zoning Districts within City Code Section 1006. Chair Mulder opened the hearing and requested City Planning Thomas Paschke to present verbal summary of the staff report dated November 5, 2003. He explained the need for clarity and advised the Commission to remove the term "Lot Coverage" and its requirements since it is the only place in the Code where it is used, and it has been superceded by the use of setbacks, parking, and surface water management regulations. The Commission agreed that the term "cube" in the existing code needed to be either defined or replaced. Staff was asked to work on this issue; "mass" was considered as an alternative. Chair Mulder and Member Traynor explained the confusion over what started or triggered a Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment. Member Bakeman suggested using the "floor area ratio" as a possible trigger. Member Peper asked if a more generalized definition or description might help administer the Code for the PUD process. Paschke explained his interpretation of "cube" and will contact the author, attorney Joel Jamnik. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Stone, to continue the review of the proposed amendments to City Code Title 10, Chapter 1006, Sections 1006.01 through 1006.05 to the December 3, 2003 meeting. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Motion carried. e. Planning File 3524: Request by the City of Roseville to amend the text of the Industrial Zoning Districts within the City Code Section 1007. Chair Mulder opened the hearing and requested City Planning Thomas Paschke to present verbal summary of the staff report dated November 5, 2003. The Commission discussed the general issues of permitted uses and how the language has changed in the past 50 years (no more felt hat and hosiery production i). The Commission agreed to review the specific uses and determine whether some or all could be removed and more generalized terms such as "light assembly" or "light manufacturing" could be used. Staff will also review other city definitions. Motion: Member Traynor moved, second by Member Ipsen, to continue further review of the proposed amendments to City Code Title 10, Chapter 1007, Sections 1007.01 through 1007.04 to the December 3, 2003 meeting. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0