pm_040407 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville Planning Commission Meeting Wednesday, April 7, 2004 1. Call to Order Chair Mulder called the regular meeting of the City of Roseville Planning Commission to order at 6:35 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chambers. 2. Roll Call Present: Traynor, Bakeman, Stone, Blank, Mulder, Ipsen Absent: None Staff present: Dennis Welsch, Thomas Paschke Council present: None 3. Approval of Minutes The Commission tabled action on the draft minutes of March 3, 2004 for corrections until May, 2004 meeting. 4. Communications from the Public: None. 5. Public Hearings: a. Planning File 3556: Request by Vernon Albertson for a Variance to Section 1004.016 of the Roseville City Code and a Minor Subdivision to create an additional (substandard) residential parcel for property at 3103 Asbury Street. Chair Mulder opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to present the verbal summary of the staff report dated April 7, 2004. Thomas Paschke indicated that Vernon Albertson seeks a 16 foot lot width Variance to Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements) of the Roseville City Code and a Minor Subdivision (Three Parcel Minor Subdivision) to allow the creation of an additional (substandard) residential parcel adjacent to 3103 Asbury Street. Thomas Paschke further explained that Mr. Albertson owns two parcels, Lot 6 and Lot 7, Block 10, Arden Hills No. 3. Each lot is 100 feet wide by 200 feet deep, for a total lot size of 40,000 sq. ft. The 100 foot by 200 foot lot size is the predominant lot size in the neighborhood. To the west, across the Northwestern College Campus is Lake Johanna. This proposal by Mr. Albertson would create two parcels. Parcel "A would include the existing home and be 131 feet wide by 200 feet deep or 26,200 sq. ft. Parcel "B" would be 69 feet wide by 200 feet deep or 13,800 sq. ft. Based on this proposal, Parcel "B" does not meet the minimum width (85 feet) requirement of Section 1 004.016 of the Roseville City Code, requiring a 16 foot width variance. Thomas Paschke also advised that the placement of the home on the property was done in such a manner that the house portion of the structure is 20 feet over the northern property line of Lot 7. This existing condition makes it impossible to add a second house without actually removing the attached garage and moving the home to the north 21 feet (necessary placement to afford the creation of an 85 foot wide parcel with the home lying 10 feet from the newly created property line).