Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Roseville <br /> <br />Planning Commission Meeting <br /> <br />Wednesday, July 7,2004 <br /> <br />1. Call to Order <br /> <br />Chair Mulder called the regular meeting of July 7th of the City of Roseville Planning Commission to order at 6:30 p.m., in <br />the Roseville Skating Center, Fireside Room. <br /> <br />2. Roll Call <br /> <br />Present: Traynor, Bakeman, Pust, Mulder, Doherty, Boerigter <br />Absent: Ipsen <br />Staff present: Dennis Welsch, Thomas Paschke <br />Council present: None <br /> <br />Chair Mulder introduced new Planning Commission members: Dan Boerigter, Jim Doherty and Tammy Pust. <br /> <br />3. Approval of Minutes <br /> <br />The Planning Commission tabled the draft minutes of June 2, 2004 to the August 4, 2004 meeting when Member Ipsen <br />will be present. <br /> <br />4. Communications from the Public: <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />5. Public Hearings: <br /> <br />a. Planning File 3581: Request by Yanyun Un for a Street Right-of-Way Vacation for a portion of Huron <br />Avenue directly adjacent to 1866 Huron Avenue. <br /> <br />Chair Mulder opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to present the verbal summary of <br />the staff report dated July 7,2004. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained that the proposal was to vacate the eastern 30 foot by 30 foot dedicated public right-of- <br />way, which right-of-way has been reviewed by the Public Works Department and determined to be unnecessary. <br />Specifically, Huron Avenue, at this location, has been constructed within a 60 foot wide (east to west) right-of-way. <br />It is adequate to support the necessary public infrastructure. <br /> <br />In review of the lots along the east of Huron Avenue, Mr. Lin's lot and the lot at 1867 Huron Avenue are the only <br />lots along Huron Avenue that include this unnecessary right-of-way. It should also be noted that 1866 and 1867 <br />Dellwood Avenue have a similar situation. <br /> <br />Staff recommended approval. <br /> <br />Member Traynor asked if there was a right-of-way vacation standard for review. Thomas Paschke explained the <br />process included review of city plans and capacities, and approval by the City Public Works Department regarding <br />public needs for the right-of-way or easement. The parcel was determined not needed for right-of-way or utilities. <br /> <br />Mr. Lin had no further comments. <br /> <br />Chair Mulder closed the hearing. <br />