Laserfiche WebLink
concerns about Waste Management’s service, it would not be able to switch to a <br />different company. <br /> <br /> Commission members debated the pros and cons of each option. Member <br />Willenbring said he thought the Commission needed more time to make a <br />decision. Member Marasteanu wondered why BFI and E-Z would agree to a <br />single-stream pilot if they could not offer the service city-wide. There was <br />consensus that there was not enough information about single-stream recycling <br />to recommend a switch right away. Members Rossini and Marasteanu <br />indicated they would support accepting E-Z’s proposal for every week <br />collection to see if more frequent collection would increase participation as a <br />first step with a possible switch to single-stream collection in the future. <br /> <br /> Chair Wilke moved to accept Waste Management’s proposal for the current <br />level of every other week collection with a pilot program on single-stream to <br />occur as soon as possible. Member Anderson seconded the motion. <br /> <br /> Wilke indicated that if the single-stream pilot was successful, the City should <br />then proceed with Waste Management’s offer to implement single-stream. <br />Wilke said he felt single-stream was the wave of the future. Anderson indicated <br />he felt the same and supported Waste Management because they were the <br />company that could incorporate single-stream the quickest. Rossini and <br />Marasteanu agreed to vote for the motion in order to move the subject ahead. <br />Willenbring said he would not support the motion because he wanted more time <br />to review the proposals. <br /> <br /> Ayes: 4 <br /> Nays: 1 <br /> Motion carried <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />8.November Agenda <br /> <br />Bus shelter placement <br />Stormwater Management Plan <br />Arona Development Plan Review <br />LED – Change Out – Ramsey County <br /> <br /> <br />9.Other Items <br /> <br /> None <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />