My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002-09-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2002
>
2002-09-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 2:55:45 PM
Creation date
6/14/2005 12:19:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/26/2002
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Meanwhile Roseville is not meeting goals set <br />by the City Council to reduce waste and in- <br />crease recycling. Each Minnesotan produces <br />more than a ton of trash a year up 23% since <br />1993. And recycling participation rates and the <br />amount collected have shown no pattern of <br />consistent growth since 1992 (see graphs at <br />right). <br /> <br />Using the knowledge gained from our activi- <br />ties, Committee members determined what we <br />saw as the elements of an effective solid waste <br />and recycling system and then ranked them in <br />order of importance (see detailed list in Appen- <br />dixA). <br /> <br />What are the elements of an effective solid <br />waste and recycling system? <br /> <br />Rank <br />1 <br /> <br />Element <br />Environmentally preferred <br />management of waste. <br />Reasonable cost <br />Good Customer Service <br />Education <br />Simple and Convenient <br />Access to Service <br />Customer Choice <br />Expanded Opportunities for <br />Disposal of Difficult Items <br />Reduce Traffic <br /> <br />2 <br />2 (tie) <br />4 <br />5 <br />5 (tie) <br />7 <br />8 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />Committee members used the City Council's <br />environmental goals as well as their list of <br />elements of an effective solid waste and recy- <br />cling system and their knowledge of solid <br />waste and recycling policies and programs as <br />they deliberated various options that could be <br />incorporated into Roseville's recycling and <br />garbage systems. <br /> <br />Clean Up Day <br /> <br />Cities that run Clean up days organize them as <br />an annual event residents can plan on to dis- <br />pose of items that typically cannot be put in <br />with their regular trash such as appliances, <br /> <br />Roseville Recycling <br /> <br />3500 <br /> <br />3000 <br /> <br />2500 <br /> <br />2000 <br /> <br />1500 <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />o <br />1981 1989 1991 1993 1995 1991 1999 2001 <br /> <br />r~!.;;;.;a!iO] <br /> <br />180,000 <br /> <br />160,000 <br /> <br />140,000 <br /> <br />120,000 <br /> <br />100,000 <br /> <br />80,000 <br /> <br />eo,ooo <br /> <br />40,000 <br /> <br />20,000 <br /> <br />o <br />1911 1889 1991 1993 1995 1991 1999 2001 <br /> <br />~1'.I.c.!<.~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />'flu! eLltb!iid~ rl!'()'dl.ns pro&fam WH OftO!!.I: tnOtltli pltkup fro:!n July 1987 <br />'lhrolllp jaly 1.85. FRlm Ausuatll:lB8 throup Dulmlbe:r1996 it was tWIJ <br />pkkuP6 pilI D'lOftlh. <br /> <br />furniture and brush. <br /> <br />According to the Committee's 2002 Roseville <br />resident survey there appears to be significant <br />interest in holding a clean up day in Roseville. <br />Seventy-eight percent of homeowners and 70% <br />of multi-unit complex residents said they <br />would be very likely or somewhat likely to take <br />items to a clean up day. <br /> <br />Recommendations: <br />The committee recommends Roseville <br />re-institute an annual clean up day run by a <br />private company in which the City pays one- <br />third of the disposal cost (approximately <br />$12,000 a year). The committee also recom- <br />mends the clean up day have a reuse area <br />where residents can swap reusable items, and <br />have electronics collection where the company <br />guarantees the products will be dismantled and <br />recycled in the United States. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.