Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />'I <br />l <br />;1 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />determination of whether specific accidents coded as occurring at dusk or dawn hap- <br />pened during a night condition when artificial illumination conld have been of value. <br />The actual amount of night traffic on each route needed to be calculated so that accident <br />rates per million vebicle-miles (MVM) could be separately computed for day and for <br />night travel. <br />The method used to establish the cutoff point between naturai daylight and night when <br />artificial street lighting was needed had to apply to any location. It had to account for <br />latitude and longitude, regardless of season. <br />Artificial light is normally not needed immediately after sunset (or before sunrise). <br />It becomes clearly necessary prior to the time of civil twilight, defined as the time at <br />wbich the center of the sun's disk is 6 deg below the local horizon. The time of civil <br />twilight occurs between 30 and 40 min after sunset (or before sunrise) and is close to <br />the point where natural daylight is nearly undiscernible. <br />Civil twilight was used as a guide in a series of tests that were'made in the Chicago <br />area to measure the HFC decay after sunset or its buildup before sunrise. The results <br />of part of the twilight measurements are shown in Figure 2. Tbis shows the change in <br />ambient illumination after sunset in January, April, and July. These times represent <br />the 3 near-extreme conditions of sunrise and sunset daylight rate of change. In the <br />threshold area, the curves are separated by only ab011t 2 min. <br />For lighting purposes, it was' assumed that the threshoid point iay' midway between <br />sunset-sunrise and civil twilight. Tbis point was originally estimated by visual checks. <br />Figure 2 shows ambient values of 1.5 to 4.9 HFC at tbis point. A change of only 6 min <br />('rio hour) produces a drop to a level of 1 .or 2 footcandles for even the higher <br />value. In this immediate area then, a point of ambient illumination is reached when <br />artificial lighting levels typically used on roadways (0.5 to 1.5 HFC) represent a signif- <br />icant added factor in driver visibility. <br />The same results were found for a sunrise condition, with even less difference <br />among the seasonal light change values. The range in ambient illumination at the "as- <br />sumed dark" point was 0.9 to 3.3 HFC. <br />A close approximation of the threshold point occurs 15 min before sunrise and 15 min <br />after sunset. Checks were made with moderate to heavy cloud cover, but only about a <br />5-min variation was found in the basic assumed dark threshold point. <br />Estimates were also made on extremely cloudy days with precipitation. Variation <br />in threshold time was found to be only about 10 to 15 min. Because relativeiy few days <br />of the year have this extreme condition, it was felt this should not make a significant <br />difference. Accident reports seldom reflect the time of an accident closer than 5- min. <br />Traffic volumes are not perfectly spread during each minute of the threshold hours. <br /> <br />NIGHT TRAFFIC <br /> <br />From the volume studies, on an hour-by-hour basis, the finding was made that 25 <br />percent of urban freeway traffic consistently moves at night. Latitude, longitude, local <br />DST practice, and metropolitan area size appear to cause no significant variation. <br />This is an important finding, for it allows direct calculation of rate ratios in the <br />absence of traffic counts. The night-day ratio (per million vebicle-miles or any other <br />travel exposure measure) is mathematically equal to ~ times the number of night acci- <br />dents divided by the number of day accidents. <br /> <br />LIGHTING MEASUREMENTS AND VARIATIONS <br /> <br />Most measurements of existing lighting were taken under "live" traffic conditions <br />between 2:00 and 5:00 a. m. Measurements were made at 14 freeway locations. These <br />were chosen to be as representative as possible of typical spacing for each route. Read- <br />ings at 10 sites were taken directly below 2 to 7 adjacent luminalres. For each location <br />these "below-luminaire" HFe readings were tabulated and averaged. Grid readings <br />were then taken between the pair of luminaires that best represented an average. Points <br />were chosen along pavement edges and at quarter-spacing transverse lines. <br />From the grid readings, typical in-service illumination and uniformity ratios were <br />determined. The initial design values were calculated from manufacturers' photometric <br /> <br />r..,'""',.._....,,_.,.._~.,..-,-.._. <br /> <br />,".!~ <br />