Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'I <br />;1 <br />'I <br />Ii <br />JI <br />j <br /> <br />j~ <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />L <br />I" <br />i:i <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />The foregoing findings in actual roadway illumination show such extremes in HFC <br />averages and uniformity (average-to-minimum) that serious doubt is cast on the value <br />of such elements in lighting design. The erratic performance of systems certainly in- <br />validates any analysis of fine differences among various designs. The subject research <br />assignment was to investigate relatively small differences in lighting and to search for <br />nominal design values. However J the extent of variations may be enough to "wash Dut" <br />meaningful analysis. For example, a variation of 50 percent produces in an 0.8-HFC <br />nominal system a range from 0.4 to 1.2 in area averages at random locations. Another <br />system with doubled nominal iliumination of 1.6 HFC will vary from 0.8 to 2.4. This <br />obviously overlaps well into the first system. <br />In order to achieve reasonable separation, a threefold difference appears to be needed <br />in nominal level (such as 0.6 versus 1.8 HFC). Extremes of this magnitude were gen- <br />erally not located for study in the subject research. <br /> <br />UGHTED VERSUS UNLIGHTED ROUTES <br /> <br />As a group, the lighted freeways for which data are given in Table 1 had an average <br />night-day ratio of 1.43 for all types of accidents. The unlighted freeway average was <br />2.37. If a freeway experiences 1,000 day accidents during any time period, the expected <br />number of night accide'1ts can be calculated for any assumed night-day rate ratio. The <br />lighted average ratio of 1.43 produces 475 night accidents by use of the equation E, = <br />R &/3, where E, = expected number of night accidents, R = night-day rate ratio, and <br />A. = number of day accidents. <br />The unlighted average ratio of 2.37 produces 790 night accidents. The difference is <br />315, which represents 40 percent fewer night accidents. If compared with the 1,790 <br />total of day and night accidents, the average overall reduction wonid be 18 percent. <br />This example indicates that the illumination of an unlighted urban freeway could <br />theoretically reduce night accidents by an aver'age of 40 percent or overall accidents <br />by 18 percent. <br />If only the fatal and injury accidents are considered, the night-day ratio is 1.69 for <br />lighted freeways and 3.53 for unlighted ones. A lighted freeway with 1,000 fatal and <br />injury accidents during the day wonid average 560 such accidents at night. If unlighted, <br />however, there would be 1,180 such night accidents. The apparent effect of lighting on <br />the fatal and injury accidents is a reduction of 52 percent in night accidents. <br />The statistical analysis involved a chi-square test for association between accident <br />rate ratios and the presence or absence of lighting. A total of 59 observations were <br />available, 18 of which involved unlighted route sections. (An "observation" is 1 year of <br />data from I section. Thus, 1 route with 3 years of data produces 3 observations.) The <br />data were entirely adequate to allow the test to be performed. The test established that <br />lighted freeways as a group have lower rate ratios for all types of accidents than un- <br />lighted freeways. A highiy significant (1 percent) value of chi-square was found. This <br />means that less than 1 possibility in 100 exists for a chance occurrence. Testing of <br />only the fatal and injury accidents resulted in " similar finding that was significant at <br />the 5 percent level (less than 5 possibilities in 100 exist for a finding due to chance <br />alone). <br /> <br />BEFORE-AND-AFTER STUDY <br /> <br />In the Chicago area, an opportunity was found to compare accidents before and after <br />relighting 5.3 miles of 6-lane urban freeway. Unfortunately, resurfacing and minor <br />reconstruction along the route were commenced about 1 year after installation of the <br />lighting. The after period of study was thus limited to only 1 year. Data were available <br />for 2 years in the before period, however. <br />The study route was Interstate..94 between 132nd Street and 167th Street. This route <br />had a narrow median (12 ft) between 132nd Street and 146th Street. In the rest of the <br />lighted section, the median width was 33 ft. <br />Study findings from each section are given in Table 3. A direct reduction occurred <br />during the alter period in all types of accidents. A large change in the number of acci- <br />dents per MVM is also fOWld. However, the total number of accidents is less than 600 <br />for all 3 years of data from bolli sections. <br /> <br />,.; <br />