My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-01-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2005
>
2005-01-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 3:51:39 PM
Creation date
6/21/2005 11:00:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/25/2005
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Bloom said they are looking at bringing a recommendation on this to the <br />City Council in May so that inspections can begin. <br /> <br />Bloom said she would like to bring a draft ordinance back in February <br />with more research for the Commission to review. <br /> <br />6. Transit Shelter Program Recommendation (Continued) <br /> <br />Schwartz spoke on this topic, which was continued from last month. The <br />City has received a revised proposal from Transtop, which revises the fees <br />and their commitment to trash removal. A letter from Outdoor Promotions <br />was also included in the packet. Member Wilke asked for comments from <br />the two companies. <br /> <br />Gary Young with Outdoor Promotions emphasized again their desire to <br />move into Roseville and other Twin Cities communities. He explained the <br />differences as he saw them between his company and Transtop. He talked <br />about co-existing with Transtop and said that his company is in that <br />situation in other metropolitan areas, and they would be willing to co-exist <br />in Roseville with Transtop. <br /> <br />Connie Barry from Transtop spoke on the question of her company being <br />sold. Shc said they were approached sevcral years ago about selling, but it <br />didn't happen. The company has not been actively searching for a buycr. <br />She explained why Transtop would be a better choice for Roseville. She <br />doesn't like the idea of co-existing because of the limited amount of <br />potential shelter sites in the city. <br /> <br />Member Rossini asked if Transtop has any shelters currently set up with <br />trash receptacles. Ms. Barry said they do not. <br /> <br />Member Marasteanu asked how this process started and why Transtop was <br />not involved from the beginning. Schwartz said that it was because <br />Outdoor Promotions approached Roseville and then went through the <br />history of the discussions with Outdoor Promotions. <br /> <br />Member Rossini thought it would be better to go with only one shelter <br />company in Roseville. <br /> <br />Member Willenbring thought both proposals were about the smlle. <br /> <br />Schwartz said both companies seem to be reputable and have a good <br />perfonnance record in thc cities they work in. <br /> <br />Member Willenbring said he would go for co-existence if the pie was <br />bigger. Member Rossini asked if having competition would upgrade the <br />typc of advertising to be sold. Connie Barry said that they sell about 50% <br />of their advertising to national companies, whereas Outdoor Promotions <br /> <br />Pagc 3 of5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.