vm_120104 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - Variance Board Minutes for December 1, 2004Page 2 of 4 lots. Specifically the lot depth is non-compliant at 108 versus the 110 depth requirement and it size is non-compliant at 9,706 sq. ft. versus the 11,000 lot size requirement. Mr. Paschke indicated the staff recommends approval of a 470 sq. ft. Variance to Section 1004.01A6 of the Roseville City Code to allow the construction of a 680 sq. ft. house addition at 3081 Evelyn Street, based on the findings in Section 5 and the following conditions: a.The house addition shall be limited to a size of 17 feet by 40 feet or 680 square feet. b.Total impervious coverage on the parcel shall not exceed 3,380 sq. ft. c.The new principal structure addition shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the side yard property line and 30 feet from the rear yard property line. d.No detached accessory structure or garden shed shall be permitted on the parcel. e.A scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating all existing conditions and the proposed improvement must be submitted with the building permit application. f.Drainage and roof gutters shall be installed to direct runoff away from adjoining properties. Member Mulder asked if there is a detached structure in the rear yard and should the applicant be allowed an additional detached structure? Clarify. To the staff- Should the applicant be able to install a garden shed or other impervious surface? (No). The site plan will be part of the building permit. The variance should be for the least area possible. Member Doherty asked if all lots in this area are non-conforming for the current code lot sizes (Yes). Thomas Paschke explained that prior to 1999 current homes did not have to meet the current 30% coverage requirement. The coverage percentage is taken to the existing legal, non-conforming lot size. Mr. Bjornnes explained that the detached structure shown in the back yard is a tree house. There were no questions from the public. Chair Bakeman closed the hearing. Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Doherty, to adopt a Resolution approving a 470 sq. ft. (4.8%) Variance to Section 1004.01A6 of the Roseville City Code for William Bjornnes, 3081 Evelyn Street, based on the findings in Section 5 and the conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated November 3, 2004 (as indicated above), with a change in condition “d” to read “No detached structure shall be permitted on the lot”. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Motion carried: 3-0 b.Planning File 3617: Request by Welsh Companies for a Variance to Section 1009 (Sign Regulation) of the Roseville City Code to allow the replacement and installation of new multi- tenant monument signs at Rosedale Square, 1601-1677 County Road C. Chair Bakeman opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke provide a verbal summary of the project report dated December 1, 2004. Thomas Paschke explained that the Welsh Companies (KPERS Realty Holding #41, Inc.) seeks approval of multiple Variances to Section 1009 (Sign Regulations) at Rosedale Square to replace the existing pylon sign with a new pylon sign (new location) and two new monument signs. In 1989 a sign variance was granted to the previous owners which allowed the existing pylon sign, conditioned on no additional pylon signs on the premises. Based on this action, the request is for an amended and expanded sign variance on the premises. http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/variance/minutes/2004/vb1201.htm5/1/2006