Laserfiche WebLink
authority to the Traffic Safety Committee, it didn’t make sense to have to <br />go back to the Council for approval. <br /> <br /> Member Fischer asked if there was ever a situation where someone <br />requested a stop sign and the committee felt it wasn’t warranted and does <br />the person requesting the sign then have an opportunity to go before the <br />Council to request the sign. Bloom said residents always have the <br />opportunity to go before the Council. <br /> <br /> Schwartz said staff has checked with other cities to see how they handle <br />this situation and there isn’t any standard. Some do it the way Roseville <br />has been, others send everything back to Council to be approved. <br /> <br /> Member Neprash said he thought it was reasonable and professional to <br />have these matters handled at the staff level and that should be the <br />Commission’s recommendation to the Council. <br /> <br /> Chair Wilke said his understanding was that the Council was thinking of <br />having the Public Works Commission make the decisions regarding <br />signage but said he agreed with Member Neprash that it should be handled <br />at the staff level. Member Fischer agreed as well. <br /> <br /> [Member Neprash moved to recommend to Council that the ordinance <br />should remain as is, leaving the authority with the Traffic Safety <br />Committee.] Chair Wilke seconded. <br /> <br /> Ayes: 3 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Motion carried <br /> <br /> Member Neprash wanted to restate that they are not addressing the legal <br />and liability questions. <br /> <br /> <br />10.April Agenda <br /> <br /> Erosion Control Ordinance <br /> Neighborhood Traffic Policy <br /> Lexington Avenue Bridge Reconstruction <br /> <br /> Member Neprash said he would like to start a discussion on pesticides and <br />lawn chemicals and how City Code regulates them. <br /> <br /> <br />11.Adjournment <br /> <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />