My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-22_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
2006-08-22_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 10:48:19 AM
Creation date
9/8/2006 9:19:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/22/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
asked about crosswalk painting. Schwartz said Ramsey County was in the <br />process of painting their intersections in the city now. <br /> <br /> Schwartz introduced discussion on the joint meeting between the <br />Commission and City Council. Chair Wilke said he was pleased with how <br />it went and felt they were heard and acknowledged by the Council. <br />Member Neprash had some comments about the meeting. It was <br />mentioned that utility fees were at adequate levels. He suggested the City <br />request that the Minnesota Cities Storm Water Coalition do a survey of <br />rates from other cities to compare Roseville’s rates. Member Neprash said <br />that a joint meeting with the Planning Commission had been discussed, <br />and he thought meeting with them and discussing the overlaps between <br />commissions would be a good idea. The other issue Member Neprash <br />brought up was water quality. He said it seemed worth the attention. <br /> <br /> <br />5.Comp Plan Systems Statement Update <br /> <br /> Duane Schwartz presented information on the Systems Statement for the <br />Commission to review and comment on. <br /> <br /> Member Neprash said it was interesting that the estimate of new jobs in <br />Roseville was so much higher than the estimate of new residents. <br /> <br /> Member Neprash asked what the timeline was for completing the transit <br />center at Rosedale. Schwartz said that was through the Met Council, and <br />that there is some disagreement from Rosedale on the plan. <br /> <br /> Member Neprash pointed out a statement in the plan that said the <br />wastewater interceptor that serves Roseville has limited available capacity <br />to provide for the long-term needs of the city. Bloom said the problem is <br />throughout the metro area, and steps are currently being taken to resolve <br />the issue. <br /> <br /> Chair Wilke said he’d like to study the information a little more before <br />commenting. <br /> <br /> Member DeBenedet asked for more information on the NE Corridor so he <br />could better understand it. He said sometimes making decisions only <br />thinking about the next 15 to 20 years is being too shortsighted. <br /> <br /> Schwartz suggested they come back next month to discuss this topic. <br /> <br /> <br />6.James Addition Access Discussion <br /> <br /> Schwartz said that the City Council has asked the Commission for input <br />on this subject. Staff planned to present background information tonight, <br />which goes back to the 1980s. Deb Bloom went through the possible <br />traffic access options. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.