My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-07-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2005
>
2005-07-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 3:57:34 PM
Creation date
9/8/2006 9:57:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/26/2005
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />However, when you compare the amount of material collected, Roseville residents are doing a good job. For <br />instance Anoka County requires its cities to collect an average of 175 pounds of recycling per person per <br />year. If applied to Roseville participants in the curbside program the target would be just over 2,400 tons a <br />year. In 2004 Roseville residents in the curbside program recycled 2,902 tons. This high level of <br />participation was echoed by the staff at Waste Management. Everyone from drivers to supervisors said, <br />"People in Roseville are good recyclers." <br /> <br />Meanwhile the average amount of garbage generated by Minnesotans has been rising. Statewide each person <br />generated 1.14 tons of garbage in 2000 that's up from 0.93 tons in 1993. Roseville does not compile garbage <br />figures for the City, so the statewide figures are used as an analogy. <br /> <br />Not everything that is being thrown away is garbage. According to a}9.~gstudy of what's in Minnesotans' <br />trash, almost 25% of our garbage by weight is paper that could be r~cycIed.\(Statewide MSW Composition <br />Study, March 2000, the Solid Waste Management Coordinating13oard (SWMC';B), the Minnesota Pollution <br />Control Agency (MPCA) and the Office of Environmental Assistance (OEA)) <br /> <br />That mirrors what Roseville found in a resident survey inlanuary 2002. Ninety-severip~rcent of the <br />residents who recycle put newspapers out for collection, thafgoes doyvn to 92% for tin and aluminum cans, <br />91 % each for glass and plastic bottles, 87% for cardboard and box1JOard, 78% for magazines and 63% for <br />junk mail. <br /> <br />In a survey of participants in this pilot program, <br />13% said they never recycle junk mail. While <br />asked why they threw recyclable material in the <br />to recycle. <br /> <br /> <br />recycle th~irjunk mail every other week and <br />magazines every other week. When <br />said they were unsure about what <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.