Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Materials Recovered and Contamination <br />An important part of the recycling loop is that material set out by residents is made into new products. There <br />are hundreds of Minnesota manufacturers who use recycled material to make new items. Those companies <br />rely on a steady, reliable stream of quality recycled material (Brian Larsen, Bedford Technologies; Tom <br />Troskey, Rock Tenn - Presentation at 2005 Minnesota Air, Water & Waste Conference, February 16,2005). <br /> <br />Manufacturers routinely have to remove some contaminants from their bales of recycled material. Each <br />industry has its own standards for how much contamination is acceptable, but it is only a small percent of the <br />bale weight. There are two main sources of contaminants in finished bales: other recyclable materials that <br />were not properly separated at the materials recovery facility, and non-recyclable material collected with <br />recyclable material that is not properly separated at the recovery facility.. Examples of the later are non- <br />targeted plastics such as margarine tubs and cardboard boxes for froz~l1 fQods. <br /> <br />Those contaminants increase costs to manufacturers because thepOll1panies hay~to pay to dispose of the <br />contaminants (usually in the trash) and to buy more recycled material to compensat~ for the loss. If <br />manufacturers have to pay more for their raw materials t~~(may have to increaseth@jJfice of their finished <br />product. Increasing prices can put manufacturers who use recycled material at a comp~titive disadvantage <br />compared to manufacturers who use virgin material becauseIIlatly SOl1sumers base their buying choices <br />primarily on price. <br /> <br />As mentioned earlier, this study wanted to look ate<.l~c~tional material~tl1at would help residents put more <br />of the wanted materials out for collection and mor9 ofthelJl].'Nanted materials in the garbage. This study <br />also wanted to examine if collection methods mightinfluel1cethe .amount of unwanted material put out for <br />collection. <br /> <br />An issue raised with commingW<.l dual-str~<llll and single-stream collection is the degree to which they result <br />in material being collected thati~not ultimately made intQamanufactured product. Such contamination or <br />residuals falls into three categories: <br />. Non-targetedrnaterials, at the(:llIb: Material{that are defined by the municipality as not acceptable <br />but are frequently inclugeg by resig~nts in their curbside bins, such as film plastic and beer/pop/water <br />boxes. <br />. ProcessirigTe~iduals, at thefaFility: ~aterials that are disposed as trash as an unwanted by-product <br />after processing of recyclablell1aterials at MRFs, such as dirt, residue in containers, and items <br />contaminated t()1:l1~ point ofrendering them non-marketable. <br />. Contaminants in marketed product, at the mill: Inclusion of materials that are prohibited or which <br />exceed specificatiorisforanend-market. For example, glass is a prohibited contaminant in most end <br />market specifications fol'newspaper bales from recovered paper suppliers. <br /> <br />Regarding glass, in addition to any potential contamination of recovered paper, there is an ongoing debate <br />about glass that is broken during the collection and processing of commingled materials that cannot be <br />separated by color for recycling back into glass bottles. Such glass pieces may instead be used for lower <br />value uses, such as alternative daily cover at landfills, raising the question as to whether some of those uses <br />should be treated as recycling or disposal. <br /> <br />To measure what is in the recycling collected at the curb Roseville conducted material composition sorts as <br />part of this pilot program. <br /> <br />II <br />