My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-07-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2005
>
2005-07-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 3:57:34 PM
Creation date
9/8/2006 9:57:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/26/2005
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />March 23, 2005 <br />Page 17 <br /> <br />. The amount of contaminants collected via the single stream method was higher than the <br />dual stream method. <br /> <br />Comparison of Single Stream and Dual Stream Collection Methods <br /> <br />The upper and lower confidence intervals of the September and October Monday single stream <br />pilot routes were significantly different than the September and October dual stream routes. <br /> <br />The results of comparing the single stream and dual stream collection methods in September and <br />October include: <br /> <br />. The single stream routes yielded increased quantities of paper compared to the dual stream <br />routes; <br /> <br />. The single stream routes generated less quantities of metals, glass and plastics than the dual <br />stream routes; and <br /> <br />. The quantities of contaminants in the single stream routes were higher than the quantities of <br />contaminants found in the dual stream routes. <br /> <br />On average, the quantities collected during the pilot from single stream collection routes were <br />greater than from dual stream routes. However, more data sets are needed to draw definitive <br />conclusions. <br /> <br />Comparison of the Current Dual Stream Bi-Weekly Method to the Dual Stream Weekly <br />Method <br /> <br />The upper and lower confidence intervals of the weekly dual stream collection routes were not <br />significantly different than the bi-weekly dual stream (control) routes. Thus, the materials <br />composition is projected to remain similar. <br /> <br />It appears on a monthly basis that greater quantities of materials are likely to be collected with <br />weekly collection as compared to bi-weekly collection. However, more data sets are needed to <br />draw definitive conclusions. <br /> <br />Comparison of the Current Dual Stream Bi-Weekly Method to the Dual Stream Bi- <br />Weekly Method with Additional Education <br /> <br />The upper and lower confidence intervals of the bi-weekly, dual stream with additional <br />education collection routes were not significantly different than the bi-weekly dual stream <br />(control) routes. Thus, the materials composition is projected to remain similar. <br /> <br />It appears that additional data sets are needed to draw any definitive conclusions as it relates to <br />quantities set out for collection using the two approaches. <br /> <br />01-00253-10101-01011070001 I 13500 P:\1350Q Ramsey Co. 2003\RTA\Roseville\FA\B1544 - Final Data Analysis <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.