Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The disadvantages of captnring the rnnofffrom the 0.8-inch precipitation event are: <br /> <br />~ Conld result in low water quality volume (and treatment) for sites having less than 15% <br />. . <br />ImpervIOUS cover. <br />. If the rest of the pelmeable areas contain tight soils (SCS Type C or D), tbe infiltration <br />facility may not fully captnre runoff and nutrients generated from tnrf, lawn and open <br />space areas. <br /> <br />EXAMPLE IMPLEMENTATION <br /> <br />The example road reeonstruction projects discussed below were evaluated based on captnring all <br />stonns less than or equal to 0.8-inches and utilizing the following methodology for BMP sizing. <br />For the majority of small storms impervious areas generate the bulk of the rnnoff. This allows us <br />to simplify the calculations and focus on the impervious areas. A rnnoff coefficient (C) of 0.9 <br />was used for all impervious areas. For the examples, the following equation was utilized to <br />determine the required BMP storage volumes. <br /> <br />Vrequired = (0.8 inches) x (0.9) x (lfoot/12 inches) x (Impervious Area) <br /> <br />Calculation of impervious area could be preformed utilizing one of two methods. The preferred <br />method would be to measnre the impervious areas directly using snrvey or GIS information. The <br />second option would be a simplified approach utilizing an average lot size for a subwatershed <br />and then using percent impervious fraetions based on available literatnre. For example if you had <br />a 10 acre subwatershed with 20 homes located within that subwatershed the average lot size <br />would be Yz acre. Based on the McGraw-Hills Series in Water Resources and Environmental <br />En"ineerin" (1988) a single-family home development with Y2 acre lots has 25% impervious <br />area. Therefore 2.5 acres of impervious area would need to be utilized in the volume required <br />calculation for the 10 acre subwatershed example. <br /> <br />Example 1 - White Bear Lake. TIlls neighborhood street reconstruction was completed in 2004 <br />and incorporated underground infiltration and a structnral, sediment removal device (V2B 1) prior <br />to discharge to White Bem Lake. This project was reassessed in light of the proposed 0.8-inch <br />rainfall standard with an attempt locate all stormwater featnres within road right-of-way. <br /> <br />The neighborhood is relatively flat with several matnre trees. The area directly tributary to the <br />0.5 miles ofreconstructed roadway is approximately 10 acres. Soils in this area are sand, with <br />good separation from the ground water table. Locations for BMPs included areas that were <br />utilized for BMPs in the 2004 construction and additional open spaces shown on drawings <br />provided with the permit. <br /> <br />In order to meet the 0.8-inch rainfall standard, ten raingardens with a total length of 470 feet and <br />an average width of 15-fcet were incorporated. Underground featnres included a 75-foot french <br />drain (perforated pipe sunounded by washed rock) and a 100- foot infiltration trench. Sump <br />catch basins were incorporated to provide pretreatment prior to the infiltration trench. Additional <br />opportunity is available for incorporation of an increased amount of underground infiltration <br /> <br />Emmons & Olivier Resow.ces, Inc. <br /> <br />Page 5 of7 <br />