My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2006
>
2006-01-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 4:08:27 PM
Creation date
9/11/2006 9:36:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/24/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ -I- -~----cc;;",.....-.-c.~,.-. ----. -- <br />"Rill. - . <br />... 'li:!F <br />Public Works DepartmentlEngineering <br /> <br />Date: 01123/06 <br />Item: 2.c <br />Transportation Funding <br /> <br />MeDlO <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />City Council ~ . _ __ <br />.V:;:: . <br />Duane Schwartz, Public W orks Directot\,c~;~:;",,'" <br />c.," :.-----~ <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Date: 01/19/2006 <br />Re: Legislative Transportation Flll1ding/Other Issues <br /> <br />It is a bit early yet this year, as the sessions begin in March, to detennine what proposals will be <br />floated before the legislature regarding penn anent dedicated transportation funding. The recently <br />released governor's bonding bill proposal inclnded a lllunber of transportation project specific <br />funding requests_ None ofthe recommended projects are specific to the Roseville area <br /> <br />Numerous proposals to increase transportation spending were introduced to the legislature in 2005. <br />Ultimately, a bill was passed by both houses to increase the gas tax. This lJilI was supported by the <br />League of Cities and the cOlll1ties. The govemor vetoed the bill, The City's share of gas tax <br />revenue continues to decline due to population increases outside ofRoseville and the expansion of <br />the metropolitan area <br /> <br />It is lll1clear whetller the gas tax proposals;;i,ill be revived this session. SM"1=WIL keep COlll1cil <br />apprised of developments in this area as the session begins. The COlll1cilmay wish to voice their <br />position on this issue at some point. <br /> <br />The other issue that is alive this year relates to a bill that was passed in 2005 requiring a referendum <br />on pennanently dedicating 100% of vehicle excise taxes to transportation. This will be on the ballot <br />this fall for all voters to weigh in on, The new vehicle excise tax generates about 600 million dollars <br />annually. Currently, approximately 50% goes to transportation, with tlle remaining arnOlll1t going <br />into the general fund. The referendum would dedicate 40% of the tax to transit and 60% to <br />highway funding. This would help to alleviate some of the funding pressures and backlog of <br />highway projects. <br /> <br />The Transportation Alliance, of which the City is not a cun'ent member, is looking for support in <br />getting the word out promoting these changes. The COlll1ty may want to create a position on this <br />referendum if they support the dedication of the excise tax to transportation. <br /> <br />Anotller issue that is being fought by a coalition called the Minnesota Alliance for safe Highways is <br />a meaSlU'e promoted by the !lucking industry to allow heavier and longer trucks on our roads. <br />There is an inlpact to both safety and our iiiIld9.rmrrllli! if resl1ictions are relaxed. See attached <br />infonnation(AttachmentA) for more backgrowld on this effort. <br /> <br />. Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.