My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2006
>
2006-01-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 4:08:27 PM
Creation date
9/11/2006 9:36:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/24/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />an action every defense, immunity, or damage limitation that the City could assert in its own <br />behalf. (Ord. 1209,8-24-1998) <br /> <br />707.29: APPEAL: <br /> <br />A. A right-of-way user that: I) has been denied registration; 2) has been denied a permit; 3) has <br />had permit revoked; or 4) believes that the fees imposed are-1-FI-v-fI-ltI'U1DJ..iJJ.,<::Q.llfonnitv, \~ilh <br />ivlinLl. SlAt_,.;J.],,,L03. SubiL0_;__D.l:_.51disDutcs a det~T\J.!j.tJ,mion urthe DiIs~~tDE_,rS'g~lrdinQ <br />,Section XXX.21-.C~LL\?_~t,,:?__9fthis Ordiu_gXl,~,~, may have the denial, revocation, or fee <br />imposition reviewed, upon written request, by the City Council. The City Council shall act <br />on a timely written request at its next regularly scheduled meeting. A decision by the City <br />Council affirming the denial, revocation, or fee imposition will be in writing and supported <br />by written findings establishing the reasonableness of the decision. <br />B. Upon affirmation by the City Council of the denial, revocation, or fee imposition, the right- <br />of-way user shall have the right to have the matter resolved by binding arbitration. Binding <br />arbitration must be before an arbitrator agreed to by both the City Council and right-of-way <br />user. Ifthe parties cannot agree on an arbitrator, the matter must be resolved by a three (3) <br />person arbitration panel made up of one arbitrator selected by the City, one arbitrator <br />selected by the right-of-way user and one selected by the other two (2) arbitrators. The costs <br />and fees of the single arbitrator shall be borne equally by the City and right-of-way user. In <br />the event there is a third arbitrator, each party shall bear the expense of its own arbitrator <br />and shall jointly and equally bear with the other party the expense of the third arbitrator and <br />of the arbitration. (Ord. 1209,8-24-1998) <br /> <br />707.30: ABANDONED AND UNUSABLE FACILITIES: <br /> <br />A. Discontinued Operations: A registrant who has detetmined to discontinue its operations in <br />the City must either: <br />1. Provide information satisfactory to the Director that the registrant1s obligations for its <br />facilities in the right of way under this Chapter have been lawfully assumed by another <br />registrant; or <br />2. Submit to the Director a proposal and instruments for transferring ownership of its <br />facilities to the City. If a registrant proceeds under this clause, the City may, at its option: <br />a. Purchase the facilities; or <br />b. Require the registrant, at its own expense, to remove it; or <br />c. Require the registrant to post an additional bond or an increased bond amount <br />sufficient to reimburse the City for reasonably anticipated costs to be incurred in <br />removing the facilities. <br />B. Abandoned Facilities: Facilities of a registrant who fails to comply with subsection A of this <br />Section, and which, for two (2) years, remains unused shall be deemed to be abandoned. <br />Abandoned facilities are deemed to be a nuisance. The City may exercise any remedies or <br />rights it has at law or in equity, including, but not limited to: I) abating the nuisance, 2) <br />taking possession of the facilities and restoring them to a usable condition, or 3) requiring <br />removal of the facilities by the registrant, or the registrant's successor in interest. <br />C. Removal: Any registrant who has unusable and abandoned facilities in any right of way <br />shall remove it from that right of way during the next scheduled excavation, unless this <br />requirement is waived by the Director. (Ord. 1209, 8-24-1998) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.