My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2006
>
2006-04-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 4:09:27 PM
Creation date
9/11/2006 10:33:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/25/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />authority to the Traffic Safety Committee, it didn't make sense to have to <br />go back to the Council for approval. <br /> <br />Member Fischer asked if there was ever a situation where someone <br />requested a stop sign and the committee felt it wasn't warranted and does <br />the person requesting the sign then have an opportunity to go before the <br />Council to request the sign. Bloom said residents always have the <br />oppOliunity to go before the Council. <br /> <br />Schwartz said staff has checked with other cities to see how they handle <br />this situation and there isn't any standard. Some do it the way Roseville <br />has been, others send everything back to Council to be approved. <br /> <br />Member Neprash said he thought it was reasonable and professional to <br />have these matters handled at the stafflevel and that should be the <br />Commission's recommendation to the Council. <br /> <br />Chair Wilke said his understanding was that the Council was thinking of <br />having the Public Works Commission make the decisions regarding <br />signage but said he agreed with Member Neprash that it should be handled <br />at the staff level. Member Fischer agreed as well. <br /> <br />[Member Neprash moved to recommend to Council that the ordinance <br />should remain as is, leaving the authority with the Traffic Safety <br />Committee.] Chair Wilke seconded. <br /> <br />Ayes: 3 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried <br /> <br />Member N eprash wanted to restate that they are not addressing the legal <br />and liability questions. <br /> <br />10. April Agenda <br /> <br />Erosion Control Ordinance <br />Neighborhood Traffic Policy <br />Lexington Avenue Bridge Reconstruction <br /> <br />Member Neprash said he would like to start a discussion on pesticides and <br />lawn chemicals and how City Code regulates them. <br /> <br />11. Adjournment <br /> <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.