My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2006
>
2006-08-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 4:14:34 PM
Creation date
9/11/2006 11:20:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/22/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Hydrologic Soil Group A B C D <br />Pre-Development eN 39 61 74 80 <br /> <br />ADDITIONAL RULE CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />Vegetated Buffers <br />While a 50-foot buffer rule has been implemented as part of Rule M, it may be premature for <br />incorporation of buffers District-wide without completion of an inventory of District wetlands <br />with functions and values delined. However, it would be benelicial to deline a minimum <br />vegetated buffer requirement for all streams and ditches under the District's Shoreland <br />Development Rule. In addition, a minimum vegetated buffer requirement for wetlands (e.g. 25- <br />feet) may also be benelicial to limit human encroachment and reduce un-pennitted wetland <br />impacts whereas in the past Jot pads are sometimes proposed as close as 10-15 feet from the <br />wetland edge and homeowners later add a deck or patio. <br /> <br />In the future, the District will consider subwatershed specilic buffer rules as the need (e.g. <br />pollutant reduction, habitat preservation, hydrologic cycle preservation, and/or reduction of <br />human impact) is identilied through a Resource Management Plan. <br /> <br />Banking <br />While not applicable or warranted as watershed-wide rule, the District is considering <br />implementation of banking (of credits for various restoration activities or stormwater <br />management criteria) on a subwatershed basis. The need for and specilic banking commodity <br />would be identilied and assessed during the development of Resource Management Plans for <br />specilic subwatershed of the District. A subwatershed specilic rule governing the banking plan <br />would then be adopted. Examples of probable banking commodities include wetland restoration, <br />nutrient reduction and volume reduction, to name a few. If permitted action achieves specific <br />criteria in excess of the requirements, the pennittee may deposit the excess (credits) in a bank <br />administered by the District and use or convey them to meet, in whole or part, the requirements <br />applicable to other permitted actions within the RMP area. <br /> <br />Housekeeping Revisions <br />For other minor rule revisions and general housekeeping items proposed, please visit the <br />District's TAC webpage (specilically the memo dated 4/17/03). <br /> <br />NEXT STEPS <br /> <br />Another TAC meeting will soon be scheduled by Steve Hobbs. The District would greatly <br />appreciate your input on these proposed rule revisions at the meeting. In the meantime, feel free <br />to contact me (651-770-8448) or Steve (763-398-3070) with any questions about the proposed <br />reVISIOns. <br /> <br />Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. <br /> <br />Page 80f8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.