pm_060802 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for August 2, 2006http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2006/pm0802.htm for their community service, and recognized the value added by their contributions to the City. Commissioner Boerigter reported to the Commissioners issues related to impervious surface coverage and water infiltration; and ratio requirements for residential properties and necessary variances to exceed that ratio. Commissioner Boerigter advised that the staff will be bringing forward recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council for required options for homeowners to mitigate individual property water infiltration issues and excess runoff to remedy the overall area drainage as stipulated by area watershed districts. by watershed districts to find more options for on-site infiltration to limit or reduce runoff; impacts to individual and area properties, neighborhoods and public streets; and volume and rate control concerns and variances. Ms. Bloom noted that, as part of the Comprehensive Plan Update in 2008, volume reduction would be part of the requirement; and was a trend in storm water management. Ms. Bloom concurred with earlier comments of City the City Code for mitigation issues. 5.Public Hearings a.Planning File 3676: Moser Homes & Zawadski Homes in cooperation with the Mounds View School District request for a COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT, REZONING AND GENERAL CONCEPT-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT for the former district offices at 2959 Hamline Avenue. Chair Traynor opened the Public Hearing. City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the proposal by Moser Homes and Zawadski Homes, in cooperation with the Mounds View School District, seeking approval of a Comprehensive Land Use Map Amendment from Low Density Residential LD to Medium Density Residential MD to allow 4.4 units per acre; a Preliminary Plat to subdivide the 3.18 acre Mounds View School District property into eight (8) single-family residential lots and six (6) town home lots; a Rezoning establishing an underlying zoning of R-1, single-family Residential District and R-6 Townhouse district and General Concept - Planned Unit Development. The staff report noted that, during the week of July 10-14, the required public notices (published and mailed) for all August 2, 2006 land use actions were completed by the Planning Division. Staff noted that a full review and analysis of the proposed projects had not been completed by the Development Review Committee or the City Planner; and as a result, and specifically related to this request, the need to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Map Designation on the parcel was inadvertently overlooked. The staff report further noted that State Statute 462.357, Subd. 3 speaks to the public hearing process and within defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona fide attempt to comply with this that this request could continue forward, including the Comprehensive Land Use Map Designation Amendment. Mr. Paschke reviewed the June 7, 2006 proposal to the Planning Commission pertaining to their desire to with residents/property owners regarding housing options; and discussions with the Roseville Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) for their potential involvement in creating small lot family housing similar to the Applewood Point project. Mr. Paschke advised that, based on those comments, the applicant was submitting this revised proposal. Mr. Paschke presented the proposal to create eight (8) small lot single-family housing lots (Lots 7 through 14) at a each. The proposal would also create six (6) town home lots (Lots 1 through 6) adjacent to Hamline Avenue and ranging in size from 3,861 square feet to 10,286 square feet; representing one two-unit town home at the intersection of Lydia and Hamline Avenues and one four-plex at the intersection of Millwood and Hamline Avenues. Mr. Paschke reviewed current zoning; proposed zoning; land uses in the area; and existing single-family and multi-family housing in the neighborhood. Mr. Paschke advised that the six (6) town home units and associated land (Lots 1-6) would be rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with an underlying zoning of R-6, Townhouse District. Mr. Paschke advised that the eight (8) single-family units and associated land (Lots 7-14) would be rezoned to PUD with an underlying zoning of R-1, Single Family Residence District. 3 of 152/6/2007 11.13