pm_060802 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for August 2, 2006http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2006/pm0802.htm to mimic the character of the adjacent proposed single-family and existing neighborhood homes. Commissioner Boerigter opined that he could not support putting single family and twin homes on separate ends of the development; found commercial development more objectionable; and questioned the rationale for desired inhabitants of a four-plex. Commissioner Boerigter expressed his personal admiration that the Mounds View School District had attempted to develop the site in a way to provide affordable housing while providing additional single family homes in the community to attract families with children. Commissioner Boerigter further opined that it was an overall good project, and the inclusion of one (1) four-plex was not worth voting against the plan; that it worked well with the land and street layout; and that the development served the neighborhood better than the existing empty building. Chair Traynor clarified that he was supportive of residential development of the site, rather than commercial (office space) development of which there was already a surplus; and other issues with office development (i.e., lower threshold for environmental standards, parking lots, and significant traffic issues). Chair Traynor spoke in support of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and desire to maintain families in the area schools. However, Chair Traynor remained non-supportive of this proposal, and the four-plex. Commissioner Bakeman spoke in opposition to the plan as presented, based on the inclusion of the four-plex; and suggested a small professional building (i.e., dental office) on the proposed four-plex site as suitable to include in residential properties. Commissioner Bakeman questioned whether Ramsey County would even consider allowing a curb cut for the four-plex that close to a major intersection; but overall expressed her lack of support for the project due to the four-plex; opining that something not quite that big would be more personally preferable. Commissioner Wozniak concurred with the comments of Commissioners Doherty and Boerigter; opining that the proposal addressed some goals of the Comprehensive Plan in providing a wide range of housing options; and encouraged young families into the area. Commissioner Wozniak opined that, while he had some issues with the four-plex, he had faith that the developer would return with a design that works, and included his support for the project as presented. Commissioner Roe opined that this was a difficult project to review, noting the diversity of the neighborhood character and variety of existing homes. Commissioner Roe expressed concern with the four-plex, even though he hoped the developer would come up with an aesthetically-pleasing design. Commissioner Roe further opined that more work was needed on the project related to economics and density viabilities; and expressed his willingness to consider a small professional office complex, no larger than four (4) units with a residential appearance. Commissioner Roe was not supportive of the current proposal, and suggested that the developer take a step back and look at something that may work better on the site. Commissioner Boerigter expressed surprise by some comments of fellow commissioners related to how a small professional office could be any more aesthetically pleasing than a four-plex, and would change the neighborhood any less. Commissioner Boerigter encouraged commissioners to review proposed design elements for the homes and staff requirements for the four-plex; and opined that this four-plex would not be that objectionable. Commissioner Boerigter reviewed the Comprehensive Plan goals and previous city-wide discussions regarding Commissioner Boerigter questioned whether the City actually wanted bigger, more expensive homes, and expressed his disappointment that the four-plex had become such an issue, or an issue of the type of people who may live in a four-plex. Commissioner Boerigter further opined that the developers had put a lot of time and effort into this proposal, and for the Commission to suggest they try again, was inappropriate. Commissioner Boerigter opined that there would always be problems with any proposal, but at some point, it was necessary to recognize project. Commissioner Boerigter reiterated that this was a good project and would be a good addition to the City of Roseville. Commissioner Roe clarified that his concerns with and objections to the four-plex had nothing to do with the type of people who may live there, but the ultimate mass of that particular piece of the proposed plan. Commissioner overall project; and opined that that part of the project, and its viability, needed further review and contemplation. Commissioner Roe further opined that, with regard to the Comprehensive Plans and objectives of the School things from the original objective. Further discussion included affordable housing levels and expectations; attraction of a four-plex to prospective buyers; future Presbyterian Homes' development and density in the neighborhood from that project; preference of an office versus a twin home in place of the four-plex and enlarging some of the single-family homes; and building mass perceptions. 8 of 152/6/2007 11.13