050306_VB_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

issued and one of those signs (south side of site adjacent to the Byerly’s access form County Road C) was determined to have been accidentally installed incorrectly. As the Commission may recall, this particular sign was supported/approved to be located 15 feet from the roadway easement adjacent to County Road C. In the case of this particular sign/location, the roadway easement is 11 feet in width and therefore the 15- foot setback would be in addition (added) to the roadway easement creating a required setback from property line of 26 feet. When Welsh Companies and the sign installer established the construction limits based on the previous VARIANCE and SIGN PERMIT, the distance (setback) selected was from the furthest easement point and not the nearest easement point – hence the existing sign locating does not meet the required 15-foot setback. The line demarcation is confusing – how far from the existing property line; property line versus permanent easement line; and outer versus inner permanent easement line all play a role – but only one provides the necessary/required setback – 15 feet from the inner permanent easement line. In light of this misfortune/mistake, the City did meet with Welch Companies on three separate occasions to review/consider options to rectify the matter. During the last meeting it was determined that Ramsey County needed to participate in the decision process. Specifically, Welsh Companies was to ascertain the exact location of the property line and roadway easement line, and to find out (through a formal letter) whether Ramsey County would support the location or desired the sign to be moved. Dan Soler, Traffic Engineer did complete a field inspection of the situation confirming that there is/will be 8 feet of concrete (to be installed) from back of the curb to back of sidewalk, 1 foot to the “new” property line, 2 feet to the retaining wall. There is also approximately 1 to 1-1/2 feet to the actual sign foundation. In a letter dated April 17, 2006, Mr. Soler states that the County has reviewed the situation and concluded that the sign is outside the permanent roadway easement and that the sign will not obstruct traffic views, thus they support the sign in its current location. With the County’s information we can conclude that approximately 3-1/2 feet exist between the “new” property line and the sign foundation – which concludes a setback encroachment of 11-1/2 feet. Member Boerigter inquired about the apparent evolution of the property and easement lines that were the basis for the setback. While the property lines and easements shown on the various plans as part of the initial variance application and approval may not have changed, all parties apparently understand that the sign should be set behind the front of the easement (resulting in the present location of the sign base) rather than the back of the easement. Page 2 of 5