My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
090606_VB_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Variance Board
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
090606_VB_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:40:26 PM
Creation date
2/6/2007 11:32:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Variance Board
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/6/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Variance Board Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, September 06, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br />Commissioner Boerigter noted that the Planning Commission had already approved the use; <br />opined that he would have appreciated a scaled plan, rather than two (2) inconsistent <br />drawings; and further opined that he was inclined to support the request due the specialized <br />use of the site even though he would be more comfortable if the parking spots were further <br />back; expressing his preference that the City Engineer was diligent in making sure the <br />parking, drive lanes, and sidewalk were in safe locations. <br />Mr. Paschke suggested that the Variance Board may wish to continue the case until their <br />next meeting to allow time for the City staff and applicant to prepare and provide an accurate <br />site plan for decision-making; and to allow the City Engineer to do a site visit and review. <br />MOTION <br />Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Doherty, to CONTINUE the Public <br />Hearing to next month’s Variance Board meeting to provide time for the applicant to <br />submit an accurate and scaled site plan and additional documents to staff for their <br />review prior to that meeting, for further consideration by the Variance Board of the <br />request of Cummings Mobility, 1755 County Road C (PF 3767), to allow the continued <br />use of a pre-existing parking lot that lies within the newly established required front <br />yard setback for property at 1755 County Road C. The City Engineer Debra Bloom was <br />also directed to provide comment related to curbs between the parking lot and <br />sidewalk as it related to safety and traffic flow issues, as well as a review of site <br />drainage and impacts to adjoining properties. <br />Ayes: 3 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> b. PLANNING FILE 3655 <br />VARIANCE to Roseville City Code, §1004.016 (Residential <br />Request by Todd Iliff for a <br />dimensional Requirements) <br />to allow a principal structure encroachment into the required <br />front yard setback adjacent to Dale Court. <br />Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 3655. <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the request of Charles Weleczki, owner of a vacant <br />parcel at Dale Court and Dale Street, currently zoned R-1, Single-Family residential, and the <br />Comprehensive Plan identified in the Comprehensive Plan as Low Density Residential. Mr. <br />Paschke noted that the vacant lot was split off from a larger parcel in August of 2005, which <br />minor subdivision discussed the rationale for supporting the land division without any further <br />variances; Planning Commission and City Council both supported the proposed triangular <br />Minor Subdivision. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that, since the creation of the parcel, the applicant had been <br />unsuccessful in selling it due to the inability of six (6) potential buyers to design a home and <br />attached garage in a manner achieving required setbacks. Upon review of the lot and its <br />buildable area, the applicant concludes that the allowance of an encroachment into the front <br />yard for an attached garage or living area would afford a buyer greater design flexibility on <br />the uniquely shaped parcel. <br />Staff recommended approval of the request, by resolution, due to unique and extenuating <br />circumstances, to allow a future home/attached garage encroachment of up to fifteen feet <br />(15’) into the required front yard setback for the vacant parcel at Dale Court and Dale Street <br />based on the comments and findings of Section 5 and the conditions of Section 6 of the <br />project report dated September 6, 2006. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.