Laserfiche WebLink
Variance Board Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, September 06, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br />Commissioner Boerigter noted that the Planning Commission had already approved the use; <br />opined that he would have appreciated a scaled plan, rather than two (2) inconsistent <br />drawings; and further opined that he was inclined to support the request due the specialized <br />use of the site even though he would be more comfortable if the parking spots were further <br />back; expressing his preference that the City Engineer was diligent in making sure the <br />parking, drive lanes, and sidewalk were in safe locations. <br />Mr. Paschke suggested that the Variance Board may wish to continue the case until their <br />next meeting to allow time for the City staff and applicant to prepare and provide an accurate <br />site plan for decision-making; and to allow the City Engineer to do a site visit and review. <br />MOTION <br />Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Doherty, to CONTINUE the Public <br />Hearing to next month’s Variance Board meeting to provide time for the applicant to <br />submit an accurate and scaled site plan and additional documents to staff for their <br />review prior to that meeting, for further consideration by the Variance Board of the <br />request of Cummings Mobility, 1755 County Road C (PF 3767), to allow the continued <br />use of a pre-existing parking lot that lies within the newly established required front <br />yard setback for property at 1755 County Road C. The City Engineer Debra Bloom was <br />also directed to provide comment related to curbs between the parking lot and <br />sidewalk as it related to safety and traffic flow issues, as well as a review of site <br />drainage and impacts to adjoining properties. <br />Ayes: 3 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> b. PLANNING FILE 3655 <br />VARIANCE to Roseville City Code, §1004.016 (Residential <br />Request by Todd Iliff for a <br />dimensional Requirements) <br />to allow a principal structure encroachment into the required <br />front yard setback adjacent to Dale Court. <br />Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 3655. <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the request of Charles Weleczki, owner of a vacant <br />parcel at Dale Court and Dale Street, currently zoned R-1, Single-Family residential, and the <br />Comprehensive Plan identified in the Comprehensive Plan as Low Density Residential. Mr. <br />Paschke noted that the vacant lot was split off from a larger parcel in August of 2005, which <br />minor subdivision discussed the rationale for supporting the land division without any further <br />variances; Planning Commission and City Council both supported the proposed triangular <br />Minor Subdivision. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that, since the creation of the parcel, the applicant had been <br />unsuccessful in selling it due to the inability of six (6) potential buyers to design a home and <br />attached garage in a manner achieving required setbacks. Upon review of the lot and its <br />buildable area, the applicant concludes that the allowance of an encroachment into the front <br />yard for an attached garage or living area would afford a buyer greater design flexibility on <br />the uniquely shaped parcel. <br />Staff recommended approval of the request, by resolution, due to unique and extenuating <br />circumstances, to allow a future home/attached garage encroachment of up to fifteen feet <br />(15’) into the required front yard setback for the vacant parcel at Dale Court and Dale Street <br />based on the comments and findings of Section 5 and the conditions of Section 6 of the <br />project report dated September 6, 2006. <br /> <br />