My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_070207
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
pm_070207
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:40:29 PM
Creation date
5/8/2007 10:30:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/7/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, February 07, 2007 <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />Community Development Director John Stark provided an update to Commissioners <br />regarding the Comprehensive Plan amendment; expressed City Manager Malinen’s <br />regrets to the Commission for being unable to attend tonight’s meeting; overall status <br />of specific City departments and their work on various components of the plan; <br />recognized those portions of the existing plan that were adequate, and those needed <br />minimal and/or substantial work; time line issues to meet the Metropolitan Council’s <br />System Statement update requirements; and continued discussions among staff and <br />Commissioners. <br /> <br />Mr. Stark advised that Commissioners had been invited to the March 19, 2007 City <br />Council Study Session to meet with the Council jointly to discuss the more technical <br />updates and how to meet specific and overall deadlines, depending on the work <br />required. <br /> <br />Discussion included status of and how the Imagine Roseville 2025 community <br />visioning process provided additional assistance to the Comprehensive Plan Update; <br />due date of December 2008; what end product was proposed to be created; the role <br />of the Commission as advisory to the City Council and following their lead and <br />directive; and adequacy of the budgeted amount for consultant assistance. <br /> <br />Staff was requested to provide the Systems Statement and directives in the next <br />meeting packet for Commissioners. <br /> <br />Further discussion included the need for additional exchange of ideas outside the <br />meeting format; and encouragement to contact staff with comments or questions at <br />the convenience of Commissioners. <br /> <br />Chair Bakeman closed the Public Hearing for Planning File 3692. <br /> <br />MOTION <br />Member Gottfried moved, seconded by Wozniak to continue Planning File 3692 <br />of the Roseville Comprehensive Plan Update Process to the March 2007 <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />6. Information and Reports <br />a Staff Project 0001: Report on single-family residential lot split study <br />Mr. Stark reported on the background, status, and process for conducting a Single- <br />Family Residential Lot Split Study; and the role of the Planning Commission in that <br />study. Mr. Stark’s staff report dated February 7, 2007, detailed the scope of the study; <br />schedule and proposed study participants. Mr. Stark sought Commission discussion <br />as to whether to establish subcommittees, as recommended by staff, to work with four <br />at-large members to be identified by the City Council at their February 26, 2007 <br />meeting; and in order to establish a process, agenda and timeline for various <br />components of the study, based on concerns that adequate time be allowed for a full <br />study. <br /> <br />Discussion included the need for substantial public input and how that impacted <br />meeting times and scheduling; minimum of three public input meetings, in addition to <br />regular Planning Commission meetings; agenda items related to land use issues <br />already on agendas and the Commission’s ability to respond to the review periods <br />fairly; pending applications for lot splits; and how to complete the study prior to <br />expiration of the moratorium on April 30, 20007. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.