Laserfiche WebLink
<br />statute, and by definition that does include resident application of <br />commercial products. <br /> <br />Member Neprash said there are instances when a non-commercial <br />applicator applies commercial applications to parks, golf courses, athletic <br />fields, playgrounds, or other similar recreational property. Member <br />Neprash would like the signage requirement to apply to them. <br /> <br />The Commission had also questioned the buffer zones listed in the current <br />ordinance. The City Attorney had been consulted and said there was <br />nothing in state law that dictates what the buffer is so the City can <br />determine that measurement themselves. <br /> <br />Member Neprash moved to change the ordinance as follows: <br /> <br />408.03, C.: <br />408.03, E.: <br />408.04, A: <br /> <br />Replace with state statute <br />Change buffer zone from 10' to 50' <br />Delete "noncommercial" and include a reference saying it <br />does apply to noncommercial applicators in locations listed <br />in 408.04, B., 5. <br />Change title to "Lawn Fertilizer/Pesticide <br /> <br />Member Fischer seconded <br /> <br />Ayes: 3 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried <br /> <br />Mr. Schwartz said this would go to the City Attorney to draft a proposed <br />amendment to the ordinance. When that is received, he will bring it back <br />to the Commission for their approval; and then they can send it to the City <br />Council for them to address. <br /> <br />7. James Addition Alternate Access <br /> <br />At a previous meeting, the Commission had asked staff to prepare a <br />recommendation statement to be forwarded to the City Council, which <br />was discussed and altered. <br /> <br />Vice-chair Willenbring reiterated what residents had told them at the <br />public hearing, namely that they didn't want the neighborhood changed <br />regardless of whether Mn/DOT closed the intersection. <br /> <br />Member Neprash suggested adding that there appear to be difficulties with <br />signalization. He also wanted to suggest that the Council work with <br />Mn/DOT to try to keep the intersection open. Vice-chair Willenbring <br />disagreed because this issue has been discussed for years and why drag it <br />out longer when the end result seems to already be determined. <br /> <br />Page 3 of7 <br />