My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-10-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2006
>
2006-10-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 4:15:00 PM
Creation date
6/7/2007 9:45:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/24/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />7. Continuation of Pesticide Discussion <br /> <br />Duane Schwartz said the questions from last meeting had been forwarded <br />to the city attorney. That response is included in the packet. Bottom line, <br />the state has left very little room for cities to regulate pesticide control. <br />The only area that could be regulated is signage. Member Neprash said <br />the City should define what is meant by entrance and then begin regulating <br />slgnage. <br /> <br />Member Neprash said he would like to ask Parks Director Lonnie Brokke <br />to put together a policy regarding pesticide signage in city parks. Duane <br />Schwartz asked how this policy would be enforced since the city wouldn't <br />be aware of when pesticides were being applied-is staff supposed to just <br />drive around looking for trucks? Member Neprash said his notion is that it <br />would be strictly complaint oriented. <br /> <br />Member Willenbring questioned how many residents actually use <br />commercial pesticide companies. Member Neprash said in his <br />neighborhood it's probably I in 10. Member Willenbring questioned how <br />this could be enforced. Member Fischer said he's noticed more people in <br />his neighborhood using commercial applicators. <br /> <br />Member Neprash suggested going back to the City Attorney to ask for the <br />addition of signage language to the pesticide ordinance. Member <br />DeBenedet suggested the ordinance include some kind of public safety <br />notification component. <br /> <br />Member Neprash said he would research other public information <br />regarding this topic to see what's already out there and bring it back for <br />the November meeting. Duane Schwartz will have staff research other <br />cities to see what their enforcement history has been and will contact <br />Lonnie Brokke to see if they will put in writing their pesticide signage <br />policy for parks. <br /> <br />8. 2007 Proposed Street I Road Improvements <br /> <br />Deb Bloom presented infonnation on the five-year road improvement plan <br />for the city. <br /> <br />9. October Agenda <br /> <br />James Addition Public Hearing <br /> <br />10. Adjournment <br /> <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.