Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ladyslipper Park in a north south direction. This ditch was constructed in 1971, as a <br />canoe access to Lake Owasso. In the 1991 Lake Owasso Survey repOli, it was <br />determined that the removal efficiency of this system is very limited. Only 30 to 50% of <br />suspended solids and 9% of the total phosphorus were removed before being discharged <br />into Lake Owasso. <br /> <br />Action to date: <br />As a pmi of the reconstruction project, the City constructed a two cell pond system north <br />of the road as well as 3 wetlmldl biofiltration basins south of the road. These basins <br />increased the TSS removal to 81 % and Phosphorus removal to 52%. This is a significant <br />improvement to this subwatershed area. <br /> <br />. Area 4: Gluek Lane Pond and Fairview Avenue at the TH 36 Overpass. <br />During intense stonn events, street flooding occurs in the residential area near the Gluek <br />Lane Pond, and on Fairview Avenue beneath the TH 36 overpass. Both areas are <br />tributary to the same storm sewer trunk system that drains north to the pond at the SE <br />comer of Fairview and County Road C (OP-IB). This trunk system serves 308 acres of <br />predominantly commercial/industrialland use. <br /> <br />An analysis of the existing trunk system indicated that during a 100- yr rainfall event (6- <br />inch/24-hr), Gluek Lane experiences some street flooding and the TH 36 underpass is <br />flooded to a 4.6 foot depth. This is the result of the trunk storm sewer line located in <br />Fairview Avenue being undersized, causing backflow and surcharging in these areas. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />The CSWMP evaluated 4 options in an effort to resolve the problems identified above. <br /> <br />Option I: Expansion of Pond OP-IA: this option would increase the holding capacity of <br />the basin located in the backyards of the homes on Gluek Lane. This option would <br />eliminate the street flooding on Gluek Lane, and reduce the flooding at the <br />Fairview/TH36 underpass to 4.2 feet. Estimated cost: $63 1,3 I 8. <br /> <br />Option 2: Ponding upstremn of Point A. This option would create 4.8 acre-feet of <br />storage in a pond at the SE corner of Fairview and TH 36, increasing capacity for this <br />subwatershed. Flooding at Fairview would be reduced to 3.3 feet. Estimated cost: <br />$ I 56,000. <br /> <br />Option 3: Provide aggressive rate control for the Rosedale Mall site. <br />This option assumes a 40% reduction in peak flow from the Rosedale Mall site. It also <br />assumes that options I & 2 are implemented. Estimated Cost = $787,318 + costs for <br />Rosedale improvements. <br /> <br />Option 4: Construct a new stonn sewer trunk line along Fairview Avenue. This option <br />includes the construction and reconfiguration of the Fairview trunk stoml sewer. It <br />eliminates flooding under TH 36 and on Gluek Lane, however, it pushes the water <br /> <br />City of Roseville <br />2006 Storm Water Annual Report <br /> <br />Page 4 of 11 <br />