My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-02-27_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2007
>
2007-02-27_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 4:16:19 PM
Creation date
6/7/2007 10:34:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/27/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Member Fischer said that he felt MnJDOT was not going to reconsider <br />their decision to close the median and since they didn't have a better plan <br />that they should just let the matter drop. <br /> <br />Member Neprash agreed. <br /> <br />Member DeBenedet said he doesn't feel the accident data MnJDOT <br />provided supports their decision to close the median. He thinks a <br />recommendation should be sent to Council to negotiate with MnJDOT <br />about moving the Oakcrest opening 30 feet south and adding a median <br />between the two lanes. He said agencies like MnJDOT have policies, but <br />sometimes they don't know how to evaluate individual situations. <br /> <br />Member DeBenedet moved that a recommendation be sent to the City <br />Council as follows: Communicate to MnJDOT that the median will be <br />kept open only for left turns off Snelling onto Oakcrest and that the city <br />will participate in paying for the cost of reconstructing Oakcrest by <br />moving the eastbound lane of Oakcrest 30' to 50' south with a median <br />between the two lanes. Member Neprash seconded. <br /> <br />Member Willenbring said he would speak against the motion because <br />having driven that route many times he doesn't feel there are enough <br />openings to give people opportunity to make turns there. He said that <br />Snelling has become a heavily trafficked suburban road and that it is <br />unsafe to have this left turn movement. <br /> <br />Member DeBenedet said he doesn't feel comfortable turning his <br />community over to high speed highways. <br /> <br />Member Fischer said he agreed with Member DeBenedet, but he was sure <br />that staff and the City Council had gone through these exact same <br />arguments with MnJDOT in the past and came to the conclusion of the <br />current deal with MnJDOT. He said he may not have gone the same route <br />then but doesn't want to change directions at this point. <br /> <br />A vote was taken on the motion. <br /> <br />Ayes: 2 <br />Nays: 2 <br /> <br />Member DeBenedet suggested tabling the motion until a fifth member is <br />added to the commission. Duane Schwartz advised the commission that <br />their charge from the City Council was to meet with residents and study <br />alternative accesses to this area not to make determinations on the <br />Snelling/Oakcrest median closure. <br /> <br />Page 3 of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.