My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-05-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2007
>
2007-05-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 4:17:08 PM
Creation date
6/7/2007 2:31:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/22/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Chair DeBenedet said he was interested in looking at the maintenance <br />budget to ensure there were enough funds available for long-term <br />maintenance of the infrastructure. <br /> <br />Member Vanderwall asked how staff worked through the budgeting <br />process. Ms. Bloom said that could be discussed when the topic is on the <br />agenda. <br /> <br />Member Vanderwall suggested that the Commission should be getting <br />involved with street projects before they're even a project, such as County <br />Road B2, which he said needs to be totally reconstructed but the County is <br />only planning on resurfacing. He feels that input from the Commission <br />could make a difference in how these projects are developed. Ms. Bloom <br />said that a good topic would be to discuss the project development <br />process. There are statutes and laws governing the process, and the State <br />doesn't necessarily need the City's permission on certain projects. <br /> <br />Member Neprash said that while the City might not have a voice in what <br />the [mal project looks like, it still takes a long time to get to that point and <br />input might be considered along the way. <br /> <br />Member Fischer suggested discussing the permitting process in the City <br />and discussing the new regulations for disposal of CRT cathode ray tube <br />containing devices. <br /> <br />Member Neprash suggested delving into water quality. <br /> <br />8. Open Meeting Law Information <br /> <br />The statute was provided in the packet, but basically, this law does apply <br />to the Commission. <br /> <br />9. 2008 Budget Initiatives <br /> <br />Deb Bloom presented an overview of the Public Works budget. <br /> <br />Member Neprash said that the Traffic Management Policy development <br />would be a good thing to bring to the Commission for suggestions. <br /> <br />10. Agenda for Next Meeting - May 22, 2007 <br /> <br />Possible AUAR Update <br />Communication Items: <br />Electronics Recycling <br />Development Review Process Progress Report <br />Pathway Master Plan <br />Relationship between Technology and Infrastructure <br /> <br />Page 4 of5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.