HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-05-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville Public Works, Environment and
Transportation Commission
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, May 22, 2007, at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
I. Introductions/Roll Call
2. Public Comments
3. Approval of April 24, 2007, Meeting Minutes
4. Communication Items
5. High School Environmental Group "Cool Cities Campaign"
6. United Properties Applewood II Proposal
7. Pathway Master Plan Discussion
8. Agenda for Next Meeting - June 26, 2007
9. Adjournment
Be a part ofthe picture...get involved with your City... Volunteer!
For more information, stop by City Hall or call Carolyn at 651-792-7026 or check our website at
www.citvofi.osevil/e.com.
Volunteering, a Great Way to Get Involved!
Roseville Public Works, Environment and
Transportation Commission
Agenda Item
Date: May 22, 2007
Item No: 3
Item Description: Approval of the Public Works Commission Minutes April 24, 2007
Attached are the minutes from the April 24, 2007, meeting.
Recommended Action:
Motion approving the minutes of April 24, 2007, subject to any necessary corrections or
reVISIon.
Move:
Second:
Ayes:
Nays:
Roseville Public Works, Environment
and Transportation Commission
Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, April 24, 2007, at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
1. Introductions/Roll Call
Commission members present: Randy Neprash, Joel Fischer, Jim
DeBenedet and Jan Vanderwall
Commission members absent: Ernie Willenbring
Staff present: Deb Bloom, City Engineer
Others present: None
New commission member Jan Vanderwall was sworn in.
2. Public Comments
None
3. Approval of March 27,2007, Meeting Minutes
Member Neprash wanted a change to the last paragraph on Page 2. Sub
manholes was typed, and it should have been sump manholes.
Member Neprash also brought up part of the discussion of the County
Road C Streetscape (Item 8). They had discussed the prairie approach
verses the semi-formal approach. Deb Bloom said she had included their
ideas in the Council Action, and it would be added to the PWETC
minutes.
Member Neprash moved to approve the minutes with corrections noted of
the March 27,2007, meeting of the Public Works, Environment and
Transportation Commission. Member DeBenedet seconded.
Ayes: 2
Nays: 0
Page I of5
Motion carried
Approval of the February 27, 2007, Meeting Minutes
Member Fischer moved to approve the minutes with corrections noted of
the February 27,2007, meeting of the Public Works, Environment and
TranspOliation Commission. Member Neprash seconded.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
Motion canied
4. Communication Items
Deb Bloom reminded viewers that Roseville cleanup day is Saturday,
April 28.
A copy of "The End of the Road: ChaIlen2es of Fundin2 Minnesota's
Local Road and Brid2e Network" was provided to the Commission.
Member Fischer asked about the current state of the bridges in Roseville.
Ms. Bloom said Roseville was responsible for three bridges in the city.
The Lexington A venue Bridge is under state jurisdiction and is scheduled
for maintenance in the near future. Funding is always an issue.
Chair DeBenedet updated the Commission on the Rice Street Technical
Advisory Committee. The level of traffic growth projected will probably
require a four-lane road; and as sections are reconstructed, they will be
designed with that projection in mind. His concern is to maintain access
for existing businesses and homes. Duane Schwartz suggested that the
Commission might want to drive the road sometime in the next month.
Member Vanderwall said that he lives on the east side of Roseville and
drives across Rice Street quite often. He almost always sees pedestrians
trying to get across, plus there are children walking to school in that area.
He wants to make sure pedestrians are given more consideration in
designs changes.
5. F ertilizer/Pesticide Discussion
Member Vanderwall moved to recommend the final draft of the ordinance
to the City Council for their action. Member Fischer seconded.
Member Vanderwall asked for some background as to why the
Commission was recommending a change in the ordinance. Member
Neprash filled him in.
Page 2 of 5
Education of residents was brought up by Deb Bloom, with the idea of
putting an article in the Roseville City News. Using door hangers was
another possibility mentioned by Ms. Bloom. Member Neprash said he
would be happy to help with the fODnulation of any educational materials.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Motion carried
Member Neprash asked to be notified when the ordinance was going
before Council. Other members concurred. Member Neprash said he
would be willing to attend the Council meeting to answer questions.
Member Neprash asked that staff check with other cities as to whether
they have already prepared educational materials.
6. Imagine Roseville 2025
Deb Bloom presented background on this topic. The Commission went
through the report and picked out topics concerning them.
Chair DeBenedet suggested the way to get more involved with the
development review process is to guide the city toward development
standards that involve more reforestation and avoid large areas of asphalt.
Member Neprash said he is currently working on a workshop to integrate
urban trees with storm water control devices.
Chair DeBenedet asked staff for a copy of the Pathway Master Plan, and
Member Vanderwall asked that a map be included. Ms. Bloom said it
would be emailed to them as soon as possible.
Member Vanderwall said residents don't get to see much of what happens
with the infrastructure and so he feels this commission needs to be extra
vigilant.
Member Neprash asked who was watching over teclmology infrastructure
as there isn't a technology commission. Ms. Bloom said it's possible the
PWETC could be expanded to include technology.
7. Future PWETC Topics
This topic was carried over from the March meeting to get other
commission members input. Deb Bloom listed the ideas that were brought
up at the previous meeting.
Chair DeBenedet said that instead of just looking at what comes their way,
they should be an advocate for certain issues. He wanted to be able to
move through a topic in a couple of meetings.
Page 3 of 5
Chair DeBenedet said he was interested in looking at the maintenance
budget to ensure there were enough funds available for long-term
maintenance of the infrastructure.
Member Vanderwall asked how staff worked through the budgeting
process. Ms. Bloom said that could be discussed when the topic is on the
agenda.
Member Vanderwall suggested that the Commission should be getting
involved with street projects before they're even a project, such as County
Road B2, which he said needs to be totally reconstructed but the County is
only planning on resurfacing. He feels that input from the Commission
could make a difference in how these projects are developed. Ms. Bloom
said that a good topic would be to discuss the project development
process. There are statutes and laws governing the process, and the State
doesn't necessarily need the City's permission on certain projects.
Member Neprash said that while the City might not have a voice in what
the [mal project looks like, it still takes a long time to get to that point and
input might be considered along the way.
Member Fischer suggested discussing the permitting process in the City
and discussing the new regulations for disposal of CRT cathode ray tube
containing devices.
Member Neprash suggested delving into water quality.
8. Open Meeting Law Information
The statute was provided in the packet, but basically, this law does apply
to the Commission.
9. 2008 Budget Initiatives
Deb Bloom presented an overview of the Public Works budget.
Member Neprash said that the Traffic Management Policy development
would be a good thing to bring to the Commission for suggestions.
10. Agenda for Next Meeting - May 22, 2007
Possible AUAR Update
Communication Items:
Electronics Recycling
Development Review Process Progress Report
Pathway Master Plan
Relationship between Technology and Infrastructure
Page 4 of5
Member Vanderwall asked to be informed on what the Commission's
responsibility is and how closely they should be looking at things.
II. Adjournment
Page 5 of5
Roseville Public Works, Environment and
Transportation Commission
Agenda Item
Date: May 22, 2007
Item No: 4
Item Description: Communication Items
. Inflow/Infiltration Study Proposals
. Ramsey County Rice 8t TAC Update
. Electronics Recycling Legislation
Recommended Action:
None
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: 5/21/07
ITEM:
Department Approval:
Manager Reviewed:
Agenda Section:
Item Description: Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 408 of City Code Relating to
Fertilizer and Pesticide Use Discussion of Modifications to the Fertilizer Ordinance
Background: The Public Works, Environment, and Transportation Commission began studying
the present Fertilizer Ordinance for possible updating in mid 2006. Members felt additional
language should be added regarding the use of pesticides in the City, and the public should be
notified as to where pesticides have been applied.
The City Attorney offered that the City is limited by State Statute as to what can be regulated.
State Statute only allows cities to regulate signage. With this information, the Commission asked
that language be drafted to modify the fertilizer ordinance to regulate and require warning
signage for commercial and certain non-commercial applicators. The Commission also
supported updating other areas of the fertilizer ordinance. The ordinance name should include
pesticides, and the ordinance is out of date with current statute limiting the use of phosphorus in
fertilizer content.
The Commission also recommends increasing the buffer from water resources from the current
10 feet to 50 feet, which is more consistent with watershed district management plans. Attached
are the proposed amending ordinance, the final ordinance and the ordinance summary.
The PWETC also is recommending staff work on an educational effort to familiarize the
community of these changes, as well as the benefits of protecting our water resources. Staff will
be working with the Watershed Districts and the Soil and Water Conservation District in an
effort to educate residents on how they can help and what tools and resources are available to
them.
The Council discussed these changes at its May 14,2007, meeting. No revisions were requested
at that time.
Financial Implications: There is minimal cost in implementing this ordinance change and
educational effort. The City is required under NPDES Phase II Storm Water regulations to have
an educational program in place for protection of surface waters.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council consider approval of the proposed
changes to the Fertilizer Ordinance.
1 RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
2
3 Motion adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 408 of City Code relating to the use of
4 fertilizer and pesticides.
5
6 Motion adopting a resolution approving publication of an ordinance summary relating to the
7 amended ordinance.
8
9
10 Prepared By: Duane Schwartz
,-
~/<,
o
z z
~ 0
o "
~ ~
<> 0
<> w
Z ~
e; ~ g
X "
w ~
o
-"
. .
N,:I,
-L.,
-h-- ,
NU~U
~
w .
Z
<
~
N'"
-z
"
"'
0
(/) I
'" r-
w(/) w
>-", z
>-w <
~>- ~
'-'>- N",
~ -z
:..,. CI "
N, "'
0
I ... 1-
z N
ON I N':',t.':-
F UIN . ~
w>- ~-ri:-'~8
(/);:0'<1
azUl t2-
IO<W N~
-z I
0..
~...J w
oN z
<
~
w- ...<>
(/) I -z
;;: "
"'... "'
0
.... I
r-
w
z
<
~
N<>
-z
"
"'
0
~
NU-1:l0
~
~
~ a ,
~ ~ I'
:J 0 It
Ow,
5 & r
u ill i
z
" (
'"
x (
~(/
(
(
/
,
0
NU~O "
":! 1
~ ~
z " 0 9~
~ 0
~ <
<<0 ,.
-z ? g 1 I
5 ~ <
. 0 1
0 0
I <
1 ~~ 1
,
I V> ." 1
~ " e<
2'.00-< .
" . 1 03
~ ~ I -.
z 1
~ ':.t~
<<0 ;r-
-z ~-. 9' . , .
5 " N. N.
. ,- T T
0 I
L > ~ iiI
0 <
> > ~
. >
i 0 ~
u "
NUo1:!l:I
V> t- V>
<r
I" v> <r
" V>
~<r ,- <r
is:: ~ w
" ~
" ~
:> =>
.~ " . "
N . 'w
N Z'
I~ ",
2 '" ZI-lN
Q"ll QNZ I
Gr:('f z ~ '"
w~ "" < "iEi?"
v>l'.. -~ IXI' ..""
ioZVJ > ~
NZl.L.tJ'l
w<w r--:5~~
52
~:s o. "
w,,~
:>-
0" 0 '"
w-
V> w
~ I co
~
<r, <r ,
b ~ "
NUo1:!U
I
~
z
~
<<0
-z
5
.
0 ~
I ~
> ,
> ~
~ I -.L8 ~
I 2 . ~~I T
w
~ .~
" .~
W ~.. .
~ V>
z '0".0
~ ~ T 9~
~
<<0 " I
-z ~ . ~ m
, w ~< I
. 0 ~ .
0 " ~ ...L
L 0
0
< ... T
~
0
0
....u~u < .
;,,~
Z
~
;"
~
0
0
<
I" v~
<
~
0
~
;.r
w~
:(
-'
:~
~
"
'"
i'! '"
~ '"
il ~
, :>
~o..J~D
~ 0('.,.
ZI...l-lN
gNZZI
U....trO:::
LoJ~~i?N
~~ t-l-.::g (#.I
:,~b~t3
5....J[I:' z
~~~5
'" N
w
'"
'"
.. ,
"
'"'t.lo_C
w
~
,
~~
~
.
w
~
....0
-,
5
.
Q
t-
w
3
.~~
5
.
Q
I
I
"
Q
w
,
~
,
~~
~
~
L
NO~CI
~
,
<
w
,
,I
-= 1
NUol:!CI
I
w
,
~
~'i
5
.
Q
I
I
w
,
~
....0
-,
5
.
Q
,~Uo1!<';'
-(
~.
"
,
~
.J
~. iE.
WQ<
" .
~ I
:<-
~ ",9
.. .
T
"
N
"
o
o
<
.1
N ~ ~~
~ g CL
! ,l ,1, 1
!: ,I: 'II
TT
~
,
~
u
,
o
,
.
.
'"
~
o
~
~
,
o
,
L'l i
~ ~'I
l:t. __:i
~ ..:,,~
:ll:: O""l
.,
~T
W
"
"
,
o
>
>
..L8
.~
m
i
o
.
~
T
'"
..
w
~ '"
~ ..
~ ~
"w ~
. z :>
.,<w'"
N~Z
z I z:5~
o ..
i=Ni?~1
~jO~i?N
. ~ ~ ~- ~
~~c".~tJ
5_O:::Z
~=tN:S
o:l - .~~
wo -
'"
'"
..
T
~~
m
.
, "
^<
.
-.L
:,
.1
g I
<
"
o
D
<
,~
-<
.
1
'S
,
<
,..
;~
'"
,',
o
D
.
'.
,
- ~ .~
:,<..l .0
I -
w
,
~
N~
.;?
~
z
0
.
I
I
".
,
~
....0
.,
5
.
0
I
I
'"
,
<
"
....0
.,
5
.
D
I
I
w
,
~
, ,
NO
.;?
~
~
I
I
.. w
~ ,
~
,
~~
t
':l
L
",U.lt!u
~
'" ~
'"
,
jL
-
t-.U~'"
T--
w
,
~
t:'i
5
.
0
I
I
w
,
~
,~ '-'
-,
>
.
D
.1 -
I NU~U
- (
~
"
"
~ ~~
:SZN
ZZ~1
0",,,
I=~ZN
~ ~.Id
I/)OCOCtl)
. ~Oo:
. z. w
"'tJ~9
".'13
-~ili
...
N
.N~oI:'U 1
.19
"~
I
w
~
..~
-,
>
.
0
I
I
~
j
..~
-,
>
.
0
I
I
w
,
j
,
~~ "
-~
~
s
I
I
w
~
..~
-,
>
.
0
I
I
w
z
j
..~
-,
>
.
0
I
.9
"~
I
,
NV.~~
..
i~,~.-
...
...
"
N
~
.~ 1
~: ~ :!:
v' ~ .S!~
; ~ 1 I"
I 2~ 1
21~ 1 2~
- ...~ I
N~ B
TT-
~ ~
2 .
~ ~
J
,- :::
Ci~<
:I "
~ I
"':-;
-< N.
Q.-
I
,
.
,
.
h
'. <l
N,
Zl~
~NI
U"'N
~i.. '"
OZIIl
W<W
B~
"
8~
~l
"'~
'.
> ~ ~
..
, > .
I , J.-~ ~
I'! , l'l
Z-I
~. 3~ . ~ T
""
l:J ",m;J; ~
l'l ..
0."
'5_ T e~
~ I i.'"I~ ~
"' 1
D ,.; .
VI " ...L
"
Q '"
" I
~ ;.,~
.
..1
;,
~
0
~
. NU~t:J ]
I
~
NO
-,
>
.
0
I
I
"'
z
j
'N~
-,
>
.
0
I
N()~()
~
~
. . ~
L
NU~U
1
w
~
N~
-,
>
~
I
1-
w
~
i"",
-,
>
.
D
I
NU~()
~~
:>"
O'!
"
'"
4
,
.~
~
<
s
5-..g
",..
ReA ~
~
5'
s~
,.
"
"
,
!.;
'"
'"
'"
,..
~-~-
~~n~n
I
c
'"
;;
->
,,0
:I
"
I
I
c
.
"
-,
.~o
~
<
"
., I
T -
c
.
;;
-,
,,0
~
<
"
I
I
c
.
"
-,
,.,0
:I
,
M
I
~~n~n
.C
,
. n
~ ~
, I'
~-L -L -L
~7 "I: .~
1-' ~ ':. 'I
N -
'"
(';
~
i ~i~,
S
l\iT:I
.
.
o
>
<
c
C
N
~
T
.
0<
~ . ~
~ I
." T
T
.
0<
.~
-L
o~
. ~
1
m
.4 ~
T~
,
I'
c
~
.
<
~
M
T
< ~
8 ?~
N
J
~
~
~
"
<
c
o
N
.0
:2.
N
~
<
c
;l
~~
~~~
n
:g~
. ~
~
~'"
gs
0'"
""
~
<
"
~
~n~Q
1
c
.
"
-,
,.,0
:I
,
M
I
I
c
.
"
->
,.,0
~
<
. "
, I
-
.~
0 I
_'0
."
s
" g
~ ,
< 2
5
~('J,~ --
~
.. ,
~ :I
, "
~ I
,.
"
" I
t::
M
'"
'" C
.
"
-,
.~O
~
<
"
I
I
c
.
"
- .
,.,0
:I
,
M
I
~n~n
'r:
..
n
~~
. ~
~'"
n~
~=>
5'"
55
~
<
S
~
=.
~
:::: .,,---
.
~
;0:
~
..'0-::;:0 1
I
0
.
"
-,
.~o
:I
"
I
I
c
.
"
->
,.,0
~
<
. ,
M
, I
'"
0 I
'"
tA~
. s
"," g
ij~ ,
I< ~
~5 -~
~~<"1 .
~.. ,
~ ~
:I, <
"
s I
~~
,. ~
."
"
=> I
~
~
'"
'" c
'"
"
-,
,.,0
~
co
I
.-
I
~
"
-,
,.,0
~
<
"
I
I
'"
g
-';
,.,.
>
~
I
Y'n-;lQ
-r
. Bemidji Pioneer'
Subscribe Today
~vg In I
Register
PressPass
Tips
CIassifieds
Home News
Legislature Associated
Press Weather SpOlis
Opinion Entertainment
Community Business
Records Obituaries
Talk Photo Galleries
Multimedia Farm
Outdoors Bilihs Public
Notices
Archive Promotions
Marketplace
Newspaperprints
Member Center
Company Site E-Mail
Index Resources
Subscribe Yellow
Pages
t:mJ
Sunday in Parade
More Bonus
Features
Pioneer
Subscribe I Advertise I News
Page I of3
Thursday, May 17, 2007
search:
L
Pawlenty signs e-waste
1.t1gislation
~
"..(
,
"
,
.
. ", ..J I!:J~~~ ' ...'JI
-
~
Text Size: A A A
~ Print this article
"
" ~ EThililthis article
Most popular articles
Lil. Breaking News E-
mail Alerts
f\ Purchase a print
Save and share
", Bookmark on
deLicio.us
2Gi Digg this article
I] Share on Facebook
HotJobs ~
jobsliQ
Brad Swenson Bemidji Pioneer
Published Thursday, May 10,2007
A bill aiding . advertisement.
counties in the
collection and
recycling of
electronics such as
computer monitors
and DVD players
was signed into
law Tuesday by
Gov. Tim
Pa~lenty.
"I'm so proud that
Minnesota is on the
leading edge of
helping people to
recycle responsibly," Rep. Brita Sailer, DFL-Park Rapids, chief
author of the bill, said in a statement.
"As technology continues to improve and change, more of these
products will be replaced for newer models," she said. "This new
law makes sure that manufacturers will share in the responsibility
that up until now has fallen primarily on counties and property tax
payers. "
RELATED Sailer sought to correct a problem
created by the 2006 Legislature,
CONTENT which banned the disposal of
{ji'. Add a comment electronic waste into the normal
Brad Swenson Archive waste stream, forcing counties to
set up a collection system. As the legislation didn't give counties an
alternative disposal method, counties began charging people to
dispose of electronic waste to cover their costs.
As a result, counties across Minnesota have seen substantial
increases in illegal dumping in ditches, wooded areas and other
areas, rather than having people pay extra to dispose of video
display devices such as computer monitors and televisions.
Jlelp 'Vantcd tmmediate Openings
fur 10 Agents Spanish Speak..
Posil'ion Description Title: Electrical
Technician FLSA: N..
\Vidseth Smith Nolting is a growing
30 ye~u~old Architectural..
\Vidscth Smith Nolting is a growing
30 yef:lr~old Architectural..
Deer River HealthCare Center Come
join our team! We offer..
AJIJ:1QtJQ.h.~m;~t
Search JobsHQ I_---.J II
Midwest Computer Recvcler
Recycling Wisconsin & the
Midwest Copier.Electronics-
Celis-Data Erase
www.deadcomputers.com
http://www.bemidjipioneer.com/articles/index.cfm ?id=8764§ion=News&CFID=3 363 95 I 9&CFTO ... 05/17/2007
. Bemidji Pioneer'
The new law, says Sailer, "makes sure that manufacturers share in
the responsibility of making sure they are recycled properly, and in
a way that is easier for consumers."
"E-waste" is the informal name for electronic products that are no
longer useful. The products include computers, televisions, VCRs,
stereos, printers and keyboards, CPUs, copiers and fax machines
that can be reused, refurbished or recycled.
The legislation requires consumer electronics manufacturers to
collect and recycle an amount of devices proportional to the weight
of new devices sold during the previous year. The requirements on
manufacturers call for collection of an amount of devices in the first
year of the program equal to 60 percent of the weight of products
sold during the previous year, and 80 percent in the years thereafter.
The new law requires manufacturers to pay a $5,000 base fee
during the first program year, reduced to $2,500 annually thereafter,
plus a variable amount ranging between 30 cents and 50 cents for
each pound short of their target.
Manufacturers who recycle less than 50 percent of their target pay
50 cents for each pound under the target; those reaching 90 percent
of their recycling target pay 30 cents per pound. Manufacturers who
surpass their target earn credits that can be used in future years or
sold to other manufacturers.
It's hoped that eventually counties will stop charging consumers to
dispose of e-waste, Sailer said, although admittedly manufacturers
can roll those costs into their retail price.
To balance the lower population densities and greater travel
distances in rural Minnesota, recycled electronic devices collected
in those counties are counted at 1.5 times their actual weight. That's
designed as an incentive to bring e-waste collection and recycling
programs to rural Minnesota, Sailer said.
"We heard from county officials about patched-together programs
and increased costs - often accompanied by property taxes
increases to pay for it," Sailer said late Tuesday. "This bill provides
counties with assistance to pay for that unfunded mandate by
making sure that manufacturers share in the responsibility to
manage electronic wastes.
"This bill also provides strong incentives for private recycling
companies to enter into the electronics recycling field as they
partner with counties, cities and manufacturers to set up electronics
recycling systems which will recycle old electronics properly and in
a way that is easier for consumers," Sailer added.
Five years in the making, the bill received strong bipartisan backing
and was supported by a wide range of organizations, associations
and companies including recyclers, electronics retailers, local
governments, environmental organizations and industry, she said.
Page 2 of3
We Recvcle Your Waste
We'll sort, load and recycle your
waste. Book online, save $10!
1800GotJunk.com
~~.!~~
http://www.bernidjipioneer.com/articles/index.cfm ?id=87 64§ion=News&CFID=33 63 9519&CFTO... 05/17/2007
. Bemidji Pioneer'
With the Senate version carried by Sen. Linda Higgins, DFL-
Minneapolis, final versions of the measure passed 114-16 in the
House and 63-1 in the Senate.
Electronics manufacturers must register with the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency as of Sept. 1, which is also the date that
collectors and recyclers of e-waste must also register.
Starting Aug. 1,2008, recyclers and collectors must annually report
the weight of e-waste collected. As of Sept. 1,2008, manufacturers
must report annually the total weight of video display devices sold
the Minnesota households during the prior year.
"I think the most rewarding part of this process was the great
example of participatory democracy it provided," said Sailer. "A
wide range of stakeholders were able to voice their concerns and
the resulting legislation represents a balanced solution that fits the
needs of our state. Once again Minnesota sets the standard for good
environmental stewardship partnered with practical economic
considerations, and that's a winning combination for our state."
Would you like to comment on this article?
Create a account
Already have an account with us? Log in
P'ws I Weather I Sports I Ente11ainment I Business
':::omments/Ouestions I Advertising Information I FCC Careers I Privacy Statement
Archives I Make Us Your Homepage
Forum Communications Company
Ii':) 2007 Forum Communications Co. Fargo, ND 58102 - All rights reserved
Page 3 of3
iobsHO I carsHO
Terms & Conditions
Bemidji Pioneer
1320 Neilson Ave. S.E.
Bemidji, MN 56619-0455
http://www.bemidjipioneer.com/articles/index.cfm ?id=87 64§ion=News&CFID=3363 95l9&CFTO... 05/17/2007
Roseville Public Works, Environment and
Transportation Commission
Agenda Item
Date: May 22, 2007
Item No: 5
Item Description: High School Environmental Group "Cool Cities Campaign"
The City Council is considering a resolution supporting a "Cool Cities Campaign" at its Monday,
May 21, 2007, meeting. If adopted, this resolution will charge the City's commissions and staff
to embrace and identify areas that the City can reduce energy consumption or emissions and
generally reduce our impact on the environment.
This topic came to light recently after a Roseville High School environmental group gave a
presentation to the City Council. This group has been invited to the PWETC meeting to present
this information. We have included some background on this topic from previous Council
meetings and from the internet. We will have more Council direction after their Monday night
meeting.
Recommended Action:
Discussion of presentation and future agenda discussion areas
u.s. MAYORS'
CLIMATE PROTECTION AGREEMENT
I
"~.J:~
.~,;:, ~
CLIMATE ACTION HANDBOOK
IeLEI
L Lo,,)
Govemmfnl5
(or Su!>tolin"bilily
~ City of Seattle
!~..'....
":'." of'
'..:(.~
IeLEI
L lo,,'
Governments
for SusloJin.lbility
~
~
'W:
TIle CJunilte Acuon HJndbook 15 a resource guide on c1illlJtc protection C[(\JICclllY
IClXI . lOC81 Governments for Sustatl13billty wlttl support from Ille Cny of Scalllc i!lld tile
U 5 Confcrcncp. of Mayors.
ICLEI . local Governments for Sustainability
Executive Director, Ie LEI U.S.A
Michelle Wyman
City of Seattle
Mayor
Greg Nickels
Director, Office of Sustainability and the Environment
Steve Nicholas
U.S. Conference of Mayors
Executive Director
Tom Cochran
President
Mayor Michael A. GUIdo. Dearborn 1M I)
Vice President
Mayor Douglas H. Palmer Trenton (NJ)
Chair of Advisory Board
Mayor Manuel A. Diaz. Miami (fL)
Energy Commission Chair
Mayor Will Wynn. Austin (TX)
Environment Commission Chair
Mayor Patrick McCrory. Charlotte (NC)
U.S. Mayors' Council on Climate Protection
Co.chairs
Mayor Greg Nickels. Seattle 0NA)
Mayor James Brainard. Carmel (IN)
IClEI . local Governments for Sustainability
436 14th Street. SUite 1520
Oakland. CA 94612
P 1510) 844.0699
F 1510) 844.0698
E iclci-usa@iclci.org
table of contents
Purpose .. . . 4
Climate Protection Benefits 5
SECTION I: POLICIES .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
SECTION II: ACTIONS & TOOLS . 7
Implementing Climate Protection Actlons , 7
ICLEl's Cities for Climate Protection' Campaign 7
Sample Actions and Measures ... ...... . . . . 11
land Use Management and Urban Forestry . . . 11
TransponalJon Planning . 12
Green Power... 13
Energy Efficiency '4
Green Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . 15
Water and Wastewater Management . . . . . . '5
Recycling and Waste Reduction 16
Education and Outreach . . . . . 16
Cost Effective Actions to Reduce Global WarmIng Pollution . . . . 17
Section III: Best Practices and Resources. . . . . 19
land Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Green Power . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Energy Efficiency ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Energy Star Purchasing . . . . . . . . . . 27
Green Building .. . . . . . . . . 28
Water and Wastewater Management , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Recycling and Waste Reduction . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 31
Education and Outreach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 32
Appendix: The U.S. Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement 35
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37
purpose
This t1andbook contains an
abundance of resources and
tools, which are marked as
follows:
a For informational Web
RESOURCES
o For TOOLS that arc
available to assist you
Climate Action Handbook
Tlw Clim3tt' Action Handbook offers examples of actions thai local gm'cffll1wnts can
takl' 10 n-dun' global warming {'missions and implement the fommitnlC'I1IS for climate
prott'nion callt'C1 out in Ill(' U.S. Mayors' Climate Prol('rtion Agn'(,l11j.nt (MCPA). Tlw
Handbook demonstrates that clim3H' protection does not Ill'("('ssital{' {'ntin'ly Ill'\\'
gO\'l'rnnlC'llt opt'rations. it i\ a mattC'r of stn'allllining and making modifkatiol1\ and
imprO\'l'Illl'IltS to many of thl' SYSH'lllS and opC'raliom. a city alrC'any has in place'.
This Handbook offt'rs initial stl'pS a city can take' 10 ('ffccti\"('ly C'ngagc ill mccting tl1('
7 p('rce'llt targt't ~N forth in tll(' MCPA and a("hieY(' dC'('pl'r rC'duniol15 for r('(luring tlu'
greenhousC' gas C'mis~ions that arr global warming pollutants.
This guide' is ~('paratt'd into thn'(' st'niollS that offl'r simpll' next strps to advance
dimatl' protr("tion in your city:
)hl ,11
Policies
~cct 1011 2 Actions & Tools
S<.dlC1n
Best Practices & Resources
What Can Local Governments do?
Loral gO\"l'rnmellts haw the powC'r to affect the main sourccs of pollution directly
linked to dimatt' chang(': l'nergy USe'. transportation, and waste. Cities control thr day-
to-day activities that determine th(' amount of t'lH'rgy uSNI and v,;astl' gC'Tl('ratt'd by th('ir
community - from land us(' and zoning dl'cisiollS to control OVl'r building codes alld
Hnn\('s. infrastructllrc in\T'5tm('nts. municipal service de!ivrry and lIlanagemrnt of
schools. parks and rC'(Teation ar('l)\.
A rangC' of ani om can he incorporated into tll('5(, operations to r('duCt' as\ocia(('d global
""arming {'missions. Local govrrnmcnts arc uniquely positioned to inflm'nce citiz('T1
behavior5 that dir('ctly affC'ct dimatl' dmngC' such as transportation options. l'lH'rgj'
consumption pattC'rns. and gC'Ill'ral consuITl('r dC'cisions.
The following s('C{iol1s offrr thl' polich's, tools and brst prarli("("s Ill'(,lh'd to help a city
ml'('l tll(' commitlTIrnts of til(' MCPA and positively support th(' path to C'fft'ctivrly
n'dllcing global warming pollutants and advancing climatl' protcction.
climate protection benefits
:. Save Taxpayer Dollars
a
Actions that reduce global warming pollution also reduce electricity and fuel use,
minimizing energy costs for Citizens. businesses and local governments. In 2005. through
IClEl's Cities for Climate Protectlonf (CCP) Campaign morc than 160 U,S. local
governments reported collective savings of over 23 million tons of global warming
pollution and $600 million in related energy and fuel costs.
:. Build the Local Economy and Create Jobs
Decreased energy costs and the provIsion of new energy services and technologies (e.g.
energy efficiency and renewable energy) give local government and private firms a
competltlve edge. Demand for energy efficient products and services and for new or
alternative energy technologies expands local business and creates local jobs.
:. Improve Air Quality and Public Health
RedUCing global warming pollutants also helps Cities comply with federal air quality
regulations and preserves federal funding for local projects. These strategies ultimately
create less air pollution, which results in fewer air quality-related public health Impacts.
such as asthma and other respiratory ailments.
:. Improve Community Livability
Cutting global warming pollution Includes measures that also reduce auto dependency
and traffiC congestion. clean the air. and contribute to more efficient land use patterns and
walkable neighborhoods. In combination. these types of measures can tlclp build a more
livable community
:. Connect Cities with National Leaders and Resources
The expanding network of CIties committed to advancing climate protection represent U.S.
MCPA signatories. CCP cities and member cities of the U.S. Conference of Mayors.
:. Create a Legacy of Leadership
Taking action on climate change provides tangible benefits for citizens today - and ensures
that future generations Will have access to the resources that support healthy. prosperous.
and livable communities.
section 1
a For a sample resolution
outlining a city's
commitment, view the
elt',' of Seattle's
RpSOllJlion
View a ~l111nlc (('Sarli! ion
from a city participatIng
In IClm Cities for
Climate Protection
Campaign
The sample above can be
modified to Include
language specIfic to your
community See how tile
Cit\' of CJrtlondClle CO
has personalized Its
resolution
policies
Planning for longt('nn municipal rOTnmitllWllts is th(' crucial fir~t strp for a city
C'ngaging in c1imatl' protection actions. Poliri('s and resolutions help build political will
and ensun' that a city's capital illwstmrlHS and opC'rational change'S ran n'alizC' Ill('
intendNi bem'fits O\'er timC', Cities ran also ('Il.lCl local. stat(>, and national policies and
Irghlatioll that build political support for dilll3tl' prote-ction.
Lead Climate Cities: U.S. Mayors' Climate Protection
Agreement
As a signatory to th(' U.S. Mayors' Climate Protection Agre(,TlIl'1lt (tvtCPA), your city
joins 3 leading group of citie's nationwide that have c:-olTImilted to aclion to advance
climate protection at 1h(' local lew!. Led by Sealtle ivla)'or Gn'g Nickels. till" MCPA
aims to promote' climate' proll'ction and Ihe goals of the' Kyoto Protocol - an
inh'rnational agn'l'IlwIlt addre~~ing global warming pollution and ratified by 164
COUlltril'S - through leadrrship and action by American cities.
On February 16. 2005. S,'allle Mayor Gn'g Nickels laullched the MCPA. Today it
includes nearly 300 signature~ from mayors n'prf'~f'nting OWl' 49 million A"wricans in
4<1 statf'S and \Vashingtan. D.C.
m To scc the cities Ulat have signed the Agreement, viSIt:
hi t O"//I/INIW seat lie .nov/lTlnvor fcll1Tl8trdnef (II III 111 m=wtlo
To view full text of the MCPA, VISIt;
Illln:llvNNI.USrn(1vors orn/u'icm/r('sotuliorls/73r(j conf(,rllnwlcn 01 ;J50
Ensure Your City's Commitment: Pass a Climate Protection
Resolution
Om' of tll(' First stf'pS a city cal1 take towards fl'dueing global warming pollution is to
pass a local resolution that affirms the city's comlTlitml'IJt. Passing a resolution
highlights the importance' rll'rled offieiah plan' 011 c1imah' chang(' and Sl'rVl'S as 3llothl'r
opportunity to educate the public and thr loral gO\'l'rnnH'llt staff \",hile securing a path
towards action and imp!eTlwntation far into the fUllIrl'.
section2
action & tools
Implementing Climate Protection Actions
Cities call implC'llIl'nl a range' of actions to [('duee global warming pollution. Th('S{'
111l'i:ISUf{'S can be institllt{'d i:!(HlOC or as part of a comprchrnsi\'l' framrwork Iik(' that
off{,frd by ICLEI - Local Gonfllll1l'nts for Sustainability's Cilks for Climate
P,otec'ion Campaign (CCP). Since 1993. ICLEI has helped ,warly 200 local
go\'rfllJl1C'1l1s anms the U.S. reduce global warming pollurion through its CCP
Campaign. The information and tools pro\'idrd both hen' and in tht. "Take Anion~
section can SCf\"l' as a ml'ful resource for implel11l'llting slrat('gips for n'durillg global
warming pollution.
AfH'f a local gO\'C'fIll11rnt has made a commitment (0 addressing climate changC', tl1('
CCP providps a fj\'('.SH'p rTlrthodoJogy to f('dun global warming pollutiun. The' 5
MiIl':'ltolll':'l articulatrd by tl1(' CCP can br implrmrnu'd indl'pcndently or
comprehensively - though greater reductions and ro-IJl'Tlrfits af{' f('alized \\'hrn all of
Ihl' actiollS aTe pUfSurd in coordination. The experirnce of citirs participating in the CCP
offers a proven rrfef('IKe point to cities newly engaging in climale protl'ction actions.
The S Milestones of the
CCP Campaign
D Conduct a baseline
inventory of global
warming pollutants
ICLEI's Cities for Climate Protection
Campaign
TIll' CCp's 5 t\1i1cstones pro\'idrs a simple.
:'ltandardizcd Im'ans to enablr your community to
effectivrly Tl'ducl' tll(' rmissions from both
gO\l'rnl1U'llt operations and thC' community as a whole.
I Establish a target to
lower emissions
I Develop a 10c.:'I1 Climate
Action Plan (CAP) to
implement actions that
reduce global worming
pollution
Engaging in tll(' fivc-step proccss means that a city is
making a commitnwnt to reducl' global warming
('missions as financial ami staff rl'SOllrCl'S aI1O\,". Thc
proccss of complt'ting the fi\'l' milrstorws is not
Iwn'ssarily lincar. ThC' milestones ctln be umkrtakrn
concurrently. and [hl' sp('cHk targl't and l"onlC'llts of
thr local Climatl' Anion Plan arc up to ('ach city to
dNC'rminl'. The al110lHlt of tiTIIC' Ill'('d('d to complC'tC'
Ill(' milestones also depends 011 the size and
complrxity of a city, and tlU' availability of data.
stafr. and rrSUUTCl'S.
I Implement the local
Climate Action Plan
I Measure. verify and
report performance
section2
.1(, \~\~" .
&j&-"~
','To\!
/'d\. \':.
"\ l~.'
~': ~/~~\~{.\
> ,\,<.
.r~ '. '_
,
~ ..~, ,....., ~
illrMbj
at~
.~
-.--'
action & tools
Q Conduct a baseline inventory
An Inventory Identifies and quantifies the global warming pollution produced by both
government operatIons and the community at large in a particular year. The inventory
and forecast provide a benchmark against which the city can measure the progress in
terms of Its own operations and that of its Citizens. This emissions analysis identifies the
activities that contnbute to global warming pollution and the quantity of pollution
generated by cach of these actlvlties_ An inventory is established by collecting data about
energy management. recycling and waste reduction. transponation, and land use.
A local government can calculate global warmIng pollution for a base year (c.g 1990)
and for a forecast year (e.g. 2012). Expertise in climate science is not necessary. A Wide
range of government staff members. from public works to environment and facilities
departments, can conduct an inventory. ICLEI also supplies technical training and support
- and in some cases can provide specialized. fee.for.service project work as well.
o IClEl's Clean Air/Climate Protection Software: Allows cities to calculate emissions and
emissions reductions. The software enables local governments to track and quantify
emissions outputs and develop emissions scenarios to inform the planning process. IClEl's
Technical Program Officers provide training and technical expertise to cities using the CACP
software and implementing the CCP five milestones.
IlttD:/lWWlNc8cosoftwarc olq . tlltn://wwv/lclelorn/usJ
e Sample Inventories:
Sonoma County Greenhouse Gas Inventor
City of Somerville. MA Greenhouse Gas Inventorv
I Establish a larget to lower emissions
Setting a reduction targct for global warming pollutants creates a tangible goal and
metric to gUide the planning and implementation of your community's action. The
target In the US. M;wors Climate Prot0ctlon Anrccmcnl is to reduce emissions by a
minimum of 7 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. Almost all of the local governments
participating In ICLEl's CCP Campaign cstablish reduction targets of global warming
pollution at 15 pcrccnt or higher to be mct Within a 10 year period.
o The Ie LEI network provides access to data and information from both U.S. and international
cities participating in the CCP Campaign. The CCP network offers direct access (0 best practices.
technology transfer and cost/benefit analysis of measures. ICLEl's Clean Air/Ctimate Protection
Software also estimates the scale of action nceded to achieve a city's target once the inventory
is complete.
c~ ction'2
action & tools
~ Develop a local Climate Action Plan
A local Climate Action Plan (CAP) is a customized roadmap to reduce global warming
pollution by the target that your City has identified. The CAP Includes an
implementation llmcline for reduction measures. costs and financing mechanisms.
assignments to city departments. and actions the city must implement to achieve Its
target. The inventory and quantifIcation of existing climate protectIon measures tlClps
guide a city to understand where they can get the largest emissions reductions The
majority of measures in CAPs falllnlO the follOWing categorics'
.- Energy management
Transportation
:- Waste reduction
:- land use
As the next section illustrates. common measures Include energy efficiency
improvements to municipal buildings and water treatment facilities. streetlight retroflts.
public tranSIt Improvements. installatfon of renewable power applications. and
methane recovery from waste management.
o The IClEI Clean Air/Climate Protection Software assists cities to model potential emissions
reduction scenarios. Fact sheets and case studies capture capital investment and probability for
return. average global warming pollution reductions. and implementation processes.. Toolkits on
transportation planning. urban forestry. public outreach and education arc also available at
hlfn-Ilwww i(h~1 (Jro/usa
a Sample Action Plans:
Cily....2LS.eattle Green Ribbon COI1l!J1ission R~p..9n
~6J~rlington. VT Climate Action Pli)!]
Q1y of Boulder CO Climate Action Plan
"ert ionZ
action & tools
U Implement the local Climate Action Plan
Successful implementation of actions identified III the local Climate Action Plan
depends on a number of factors including management and staffing. financing. a
realistIc timcllnc and stakeholder involvement in appropriate aspects of the Plan to
build community support.
o lelEI best practices and case studies offer snapshots that include information about costs.
staffing and benefits as well as lessons learned. The ICLEI network of cities offers immediate
access to peers and practitioners that offer informed advice. leLEI staff also provides ongoing
technical expertise to cities participating in the CCP.
Y Measure. verify and report performance
VerificatIon of progress ensures integrity and accuracy in the Cltts efforts to acl1lcvC its
global warming pollution reduction target. The reductions that a city achieves through
implementation of actions to reduce global warming pollution must be monitored to
measure progress. Tracking progress builds political support. lnforms the process and
often drives further city investment to advance climate protection
o When the data is maintained. IClEI Clean Air/Climate Protection Software monitors. verifies
and reports results to enable a city to capture quantifiable reductions and the cost savings
realized as a result. The lelEl network of cities offers resources and support to cities working
towards setting and achieving their reduction targets.
r
sectlOrlL)
action & tools
Sample Actions and Measures
ThiS section provides a carefully selected overview of the types of measures that can make a
significant impact on a city or county's emissions profile. The measures are divided into two
main categorles - government and community. Government measures refer to the actions the
local government can take to reduce the emissions associated with their operations and
actiVIties while the community measures target the reductions associated With the operations
and actlVltics of a City'S residents and commercial and industnal operations.
Land Use Management and Urban Forestry
Increasingly. many communIties are designed in such a way that residents arc living farther
from places of work. school. and services. This growth pattern Fosters an increasing dependence
on motor vehicles. This community design, commonly know as sprawl, translates into higher
air and global warming pollution associated With higher rates of car travel. Development also
exerts pressure on a city's open space and urban forest resources. Many scientific studies
confirm that trees and vegetation are valuable resources for cooling our communitics.
local government. residents and businesses can profIt from the development of dense, mixed-
use neighborhoods. These measures save green spaces and money by cutting fuel. utility and
infrastructure. and service delivery costs.
Government Measures
Community Measures
Short Term
.0 Maintain healthy urban forests and
street trees
:. Promote tree planting to increase
shading and to absorb CO2
long term
.0 Preserve open space
:0 Promote high-density and in-fill
development through zoning policies
Short Term
.0 Plant shade trees in and around local
government parking lots and facilities
long Term
00 Co-locate facilities to reduce travel time
and maximize building use
:. Utilize brownfield sites where possible
Institute growth boundaries, ordinances
or programs to limit suburban sprawl
Give incentives and bonuses for
development in existing downtown
areas and areas near public transit
Encourage brownfield development
00 Discourage sprawl through impact.
facility, mitigation, and permit fees
section2
action & tools
Transportation Planning
Automobiles arc a leading cause of global warming Nationally. the transportation sector is
one of ttle largest sources of U,S. emissions. representlng nearly one-third of total emissions
It's hard to visualize, but every gallon of gasoline burned omIts 20 pounds of CO2 tile principal
global warming pollutant. Many local governments arc increasing tho IT jurisdictIons' fuel
efficiency by making alternative forms of transportation morc accessible to residents
and employees.
Government Measures
Short Term
:- Encourage car-pooling, van-pooling. and mass transit use by municipal employees
:. Encourage telecommuting for municipal employees
:. Restrict idling of municipal vehicles
Station police officers on bicycles
long Term
:. Retire old and under-used vehicles
.. Use car sharing programs in lieu of a city fleet
Purchase fuel efficient (e,g, hybrid) and/or smaller fleet vehicles
.. Utilize fuel-efficient vehicles (e.g. scooters) for parking enforcement
.. Utilize alternative fuel vehicles (biodeisel. ethanol. electric. compressed natural gas) for city fleet
Community Measures
Short Term
00 Promote commute trip reduction programs. incentives for car and van pooling. and public transit
Restrict idling at public facilities
:. Improve traffic signal synchronization
.0 Open local government alternative fueling stations to the public
Long Term
:. Promote community purchases of compact and hybrid vehicles
:. Help bring car sharing programs to the community
.. Implement bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure programs
Provide electric plug-in stations for freight vehicles at truck stops or boats marinas and ports
C;r( LIOn2
action & tools
Green Power
Electricity that is generated from renewable energy sources is often referred to as "green
power." Unlike fossil fuel-based power, these sources of energy emit no or low global warming
pollutants. Grecn power can Include electricity generated exclusively from renewable resources
including wind. hydro-electric or solar power - or electricIty produced from a combination of
fossil and renewable resources. Cities can source renewable energy through utilities offering
green power programs. through the purchase of renewable energy certificates called Grecn
Tags or by Installing on-Site renewable technologies. such as solar panels
Government Measures
Short Term
." Purchase green electricity from solar. geothermal. wind or hydroelectric sources
:. Purchase green tags/renewable energy certificates
long Term
Install solar panels on municipal facilities
"" Generate electricity from landfill or wastewater methane or refuse
Community Measures
Short Term
:" Promote community clean energy use through green power purchasing or on-site renewable
technologies
long term
"" Offer incentives to foster solar photovoltaic installations in the community
." Implement a form of community choice aggregation
section2
..'!\i1l
:1 ~r::
.. .. 'I ::.
-;=-- ~'
"""" -
..~:-_ _:'I~1
~;: ...;"..-
- -
--- ",,'-.., -
....... 50-:'" :-a"-
r: ....;... ~':"":' tf a.
. - .._J ....
bI: ~'::!"! II
action & tools
Energy Efficiency
Energy efficiency programs offer one of the best ways to reduce global warming pollutants.
A large share of fossil fuel use is dedicated to providing the electricity that powers almost all
aspects of our daily lives. Globally. 75 percent of all energy is consumed in cities. In addition.
U.S. State and local governments spend upwards of $40 billion a year on energy consuming
products and equipment.
Government Measures
Short Term
:. Install energy-efficient exit sign lighting
:. Perform energy-efficient building
lighting retrofits
Institute a "lights out at night" policy
:. Institute a "lights out when not in use"
policy
:. Install building/office occupancy sensors
:. Purchase only ENERGY STAR equipment
and appliances for City use. Negotiate
prices by purchasing in bulk where
feasible.
Long Term
.' Conduct an energy audit of municipal
facilities
Implement an energy tracking and
management system
.' Perform heating, cooling and ventilation
system retrofits (e.g. chillers, boilers.
fans, pumps, belts. fuel-switching from
electric to gas heating)
.. Install ENERGY STAR appliances. and
require this and the following in
specs/purchasing RFPs
.' Install green or reflective roofing
:. Improve water pumping energy
efficiency
Install energy-efficient vending
machines
:. Install el1Cfgy-efficient traffic lights
:. Install energy-efficient street lights (e.g.
high pressure sodium)
Decrease average daily time for street
light operation
Community Measures
Short Term
.' Adopt stringent residential or
commercial energy code requirements
:. Promote energy conservation through
campaigns targeted at residents and
businesses
long Term
:- Implement a low-income weatherization
program
.' Implement district heating and cooling
.' Implement time-of-use or peak demand
energy pricing
:. Install energy-efficient co-generation
power production facilities
.' launch an "energy efficiency challenge"
campaign for community residents
:. Promote participation in a local green
business program
:. Promote the purchase of ENERGY STAR
appliances
Promote water conservation through
technological and behavioral
modification
sectiotl2
action & tools
Green Building
Cities across the country are passing ordinances to mandate that municipal buildings meet
green building standards. One of the most frequently cited standards arc those set by the
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program of the U.S. Green Building
CounCil and the U.S. EPA and Department of Energy's ENERGY STAR program. This senes of
programs for new and existing buildings, as well as community design. provides a framework
for CltlCS to begin implementing energy efficiency and green buildIng techniques that save
thousands of dollars and avert greenhouse gas emissions.
Government Measures
Community Measures
Short Term
. Provide green building information to
the public
." Share the efforts and knowledge of the
city's green building resources
Short Term
:. EncouragefSponsor city staff to become
lEED Accredited Professionals
long Term
.. Require all new construction projects to
be lEED certified
long Term
.. Encourage incentives or mandate
developers to construct lEED certified or
ENERGY STAR homes
:. Require all retrofit projects to become
lEED certified
Water and Wastewater Management
Nationwide. drinking water and wastewater systems cost more than $4 billion a year in energy
costs to pump. treat. deliver. collect. and clean water - and the majority of this cost is paid for
by municipalities. The energy costs to run drinking water and wastewater systems can represent
as much as one-third of a municipality's energy bill and this is often the single largest utility
expenditure for a city
Government Measures
Short Term
. Install variable frequency drives for water pumps
. Install energy efficient motors into equipment
Make heating. cooling. and ventilation improvements in these facilities
long Term
.. Establish methane recovery systems in local wastewater treatment plants
.. Install an anaerobic digester at the wastewater treatment facility and optimize the co-
generation potential of this technology
sectioll2
p
t-
Ill'
, J'~
action & tools
Recycling and Waste Reduction
Waste prevention and recycling eliminates global warming pollution by reducing landfill
methane emissions, transportation-related emiSSions and overall energy savings by reusing
items that would otherwise have to be manufactured.
Government Measures
Short Term
.* Establish/expand recycling programs
:. Implement organics and yard debris
collection and composting
long Term
.. Establish system for reuse or recycling
of construction and demolition
materials for government construction
projects
:. Implement solid waste reduction
programs for facilities
Implement environmentally preferable
purchasing program
:. Establish a methane collection system
for your landfill or consider a waste-to-
energy facility for your community
Education and Outreach
Community Measures
Short Term
:. Establish/expand recycling programs
and set aggressive recycling
targets/goals
.. Educate the public about existing
programs to boost compliance
:. Implement penalties for non-tompliance
with recycling programs
long Term
_ Implement organics and yard debris
collection and composting
.- Establish system for reuse or recycling
of construction and demolition
materials
.- Implement solid waste reduction
programs
From how you heat your home to how you drive your car, the daily choices that every cltizcn
makes can impact both local and global warming pollution. Educating government staff and
the public is the crucial first step to changing the behaviors that contrlbutc to climate change,
Government Measures
Short Term
:. Educate city staff about reducing global
warming pollution and its importance to
their work and the city's mission
Community Measures
Short Term & long Term
:. Help educate the public. schools, other
jurisdictions, professional associations.
business, and industry about reducing
global warming pollution
r
SE'ClIOI1-':'
action & tools
Cost effective actions to reduce global warming pollution
:. Education
Effectively communicating to a CIty'S staff the Importance and impact of taking actions to
reduce global warming pollution is key to the success of the following measures. Motivating
staff to partner and pioneer simple energy and water conservation actions and implement
complex measures is integral to ensuring the success of programs. See the [dIJOH10fl and
Oulreactl page for more information
:. Clean Fleets and Fuel
From restricting the idling of all city staff vehicles or assigning police officers to patrol on
bicycles in dense urban areas to purchasing the most fuel efficient vehicles pOSSible or
using alternative fuels - cities can reduce emissions and costs from what IS often one of
the largest sources of global warmIng pollution - transportation. See the Trall<.oortatloll
page for more information
:. Recycling
Waste prevention and recycling reduces global warming pollution by reducing methane
emissions and savIng energy RedUCing the waste stream produced by city staff operations
cuts the volume of waste disposed. reduces solid waste collection fees and can even
gencrate revenue. In 2001 ICLEI found that more than 70 percent of reported global
warming pollution reductions from CCP participants were due to waste-related actiVities.
See the Rccyclinn :m(1 W(JS!C Reduction page for more information.
:. Switch to LED's or CFL's
Save energy and maintenance costs by SWitching to LEOs tlight Emitting Diodes) In traffic
signals and exit lights. Use CFLS (Compact Fluorescent Lights) to light municipal buildings.
LEOs are 90 percent more energy efficient and last 6-10 times longer than conventional
lights and CFLs use up to 66 percent less energy than a standard incandescent bulb and
last up to 10 times longer. Both LEOS and CFLs significantly lower both energy and
maintenance costs. See the rll0.r~]y ffflclcnc'l page for more Information.
:. Turn out the lights at night
Instituting a "lights out at night" or "while not in use" policy is an easy and effective way
to save electricity. reduce global warming pollution. and save muniCIpal dollars. This can be
accomplished through educational campaigns and through tcchnology. such as timers and
occupancy sensors. See the [nemv t IhcICIlC'I page for morc information.
section2
action & tools
:. Purcllase energy efficient equipment
look for ENERGY STAR labeled equipment. ENERGY STAR computers use 70 percellt less
electricity than non-ENERGY STAR equipment. Some ENERGY STAR copy machInes reduce
paper costs by $60 a month and reduce energy costs at tile same time. and fax machines
that have earned the ENERGY STAR label can cut assoCIated energy costs by 40 percent.
See the fncrnv i fflcicncv page for morc information.
:. Lighten Rooftops
In warm climates, cool roofs can absorb less solar energy and quickly release any heat that
they store. Simply adding a highly reflective/emissive coating to a black or metal roof on a
city building can reduce the need for air conditioning and produce huge annual cost and
energy savings while decreasing global warming pollution at the same time. See the Grf'p.11
fu!!lQ.u.m page for more information
:. Encourage Commuters to take Public Transit
In CltlCS With public transit systems. proVIding Incentives for employees and commuters in
the community to commute via public transIt is one way for cities to decrease traffic, free
up downtown parking spaces. and reduce emissions. These can include subsidized or free
transit passes. parking cash-out programs. coordinated car or van pools. and programs
such as a commuter challenge. See the Tr,lIl<;,nort<.ltion page for more information.
:. Plant Trees
Studies have shown that well-landscaped commercial buildings and residentIal
neighborhoods have lower heating and cooling costs. Strategically planted street trees and
shrlJbs can significantly reduce cooling costs around row-rise facilities by providing shade in
the summer months. PlantIng deciduous trees can offers shade in the summer and allows
the sun to warm buildIngs naturally In the winter See the L.1n(j Use page for more
information
section3
best practices & resources
Land Use
Best Practices
Sacramento's Transit Village Redevelopment
The CIty of Sacramento's 65th StrcctiTransll Village redevelopment project provides a 20-
25 year plan for mixed use. transit-oriented development in East Sacramento. The goal of
this project is to Improve pedestrian and bicycle CIrculation. increase residents', shoppers',
and workers' access to the City'S light rail system and strengthen this neighborhood's
connection to the nearby California State University. Sacramento, The project was
examined uSing six different scenarios of varying densities and mixed uses. In 2003. the
residentially focused, transit.oriented model predicted that households would drive 2.000
miles less per year compared to the existing zoning and eXIsting use scenarios. Ttlis
reduces each household's emissions by one ton of CO2 yearly.
Newark's Tree Planting Initiative
In 2004. Newark undertook a new project to create a more attractIVe. healthier, energy-
efficient city With one simple tool: trees. Utilizing funding from a statewide urban forest
energy efficiency initiative called "Cool Cities." Newark planted 500 trees in strategic areas
to employ the trees' energy efficiency and air pollution reduction benefits. The City
anticipates each tree Will reduce heatIng and cooling costs by up to 12 percent for
buildIngs that are shaded by the trees. which Will in-turn. reduce energy use and global
warming pollution.
() Resources
Victoria Transport Policy Institute lillnllw\wv'vtnlorClleJocumerllslslni"lIlDtm
Smart Growth Online tltl0:/Iwwwsm.lrtorowlhorll
CCAP Guidebook tll{[)'IIWVIIW,CCalJ arc!
ICLEILand Use and Transportation Planning Toolkit hlln:f/wvv'wlclclora
Smartgrowth America IlttlJ:llwVlfW "mflrtnrowtlliln1t'rIGl corn
EPA Getting to Smart Growth: 100 policies for Implementation:
tlltD:l/wwvv,<,nlilrtnrowtll oHl/mJf/rl0.l(o<,g ndf
EPA Getting to Smart Growth: II IltlD:!lwvvw <;rni'Hlnrowtll orn'ndflnctln<..o2 D(if
Smart Growth Toolkit Geared towards MA Municipalities. but generally applicable
IlttO'!lWYVWrn.l<,S (]OVICIlVirlsll1tlft Orowltl toolkit
National Governor's Association - Growth and Quality of Ufe Toolkit
Iltln:llvNv'W nml,nra/norlat/sl(c/noiJ/ln/'IlUI1Crl1,9123c83;] 1 /6 786440urlclJecbS0101 0
nO/?V(lllf'>.1 aid ~ .1fjd)5~tl2651>320 1 OVnnVCM 1 000001 aO 1 01 Ot'1RCRD
Transportation Research Board - State by State Smart Growth Resources by State
tnlo:II'NWW HI) ol'O/wI)fcn'nces/2002Srn,irtGrmvtll pelf
American Forests Illln.l/vv'Vvw ,lIncrlC,lIlforcsts orr]
USDA Urban Forest Research Center t1llD:I{wWVI rs f('d.uo;ilw/svrJCU'lr.lllld!'x 11(1111
section3
Land Use "Resources conl!/1(J('d
best practices & resources
Northeast Urban Tree Center - Tools for assessing Urban Tree Health and EstablishIng
Design Guidelines lltlp-lIwW\'J turw'iS rdtJ/lIrb;1I11fPp/m(JI(~rts')111ml
Air Pollution Removal Calculator: This program 1$ designed to estimate pollution removal
and value for urban trees based on basic user inputs about the study area (e,g, a park).
This program uses local data analyzed for various CltlCS by the Urban Forest Effecls (UFORE)
model. hltll://wwwls feel u<Jnp!svfFl(U<;clfools/1oolc; 111m
Ord inanccslRcsolutions:
Visit the Congress for New Urbanisms Web site for a listIng of Model TOO Ordinances.
Ilttn:l!www,CIlll.oro.'o(jf/r:odp. ratalog 8-1-01 pdf
Model Ordinances for Traditional Neighborhood Design and Neighborhood Preservation
tmn:IIWNVoJ o;OlmI9rowtl1oro/litJI ;-lrvilJvlcir IVDC<1Sn?tvD= 1 &res,- 1400
American Planning Association's Growing Smart legislative Guidebook: Model Statutes for
Planning and the Management of Change I1l1o:lIwv....w olallninaoro!(]rowln(]<;lnml
Guidelines for Developing and Evaluating Tree Ordinances A wcbslte from the USDA Forest
Service and the International Society of Arboricutture. which includes InformatIon on
plannIng for an ordinancc, drafting an ordinance and evaluating an ordinance.
IltID.llwv.N.... is;hlrlJOr com/oubIICallon<;/orciulancc a~DX
Transportation
Best Practices
Honolulu's Bus Rapid Transit Program
A steady growth in passengers choosing the bus for thClr commute has accompanied the
expansion of Honolulu's Bus Rapid TranSit (BRT) program. Monthly ridership has increased
from about 100.000 riders since 1999, when the program began, to over 630.000 In 2005
Assuming that half of SRT ridership represcnts a shift from trips made in passenger vehicles
to trips taken on BRI this equated to an annual CO2 reduction of approximately 7.000 tons.
Portland's Light Rail System
The TnMet Metropolitan Area Express (MAX) light rail system. serving 64 stations over 44
miles of track in the Portland metropol1tan area, sees 97.000 trips each weekday More
than $3 billion in development has occurred along MAX lines since the decision to build
was made in 1978. MAX ridership now eliminates 22.2 million car trips per year. offsetting
an estimated 26.400 tons of CO2 annually. while redUCIng traffic, improving air quality, and
preserving neighborhood livability. and public transIt use has grown 75 percent since 1990.
Philadelphia's Carsharing for the City Fleet
The City of Philadelphia and PhlllyCarShare Instituted a novel car sharing system that
includes both local residents and government employees. The program replaced 330
municipal vehicles and saved the City $2 million each year. In the community. 1.200 citizen
vehicles were replaced saving residents $5.5 million in costs and reducing vehicle travel by
8.2 million fewer miles per year.
section3
best practices & resources
Transportation "Besl Praclices
coflllf7ved
Seattle's Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning
A substantial proportion of Seattleites use thelf bicycles for recreation or transportation. It
is csttmalCd that about 36 percent of Seattle's 520.000 Citizens engage in recreational
bicycling and 11 percent of commute trips arc walking and bicycling tnps (7 percent
walking and 4 percent blcychng, respectively). In some parts of the city. bicycling and
walking make up 20 percent of the commute trips. By cycling. residents avert emISSions
that would have otherwise been made by car trips. Cyclists and pedestrians are able to
take advantage the extensive urban trails network. Seattle has about 28 miles of shared
use paths. 22 miles of on-street, striped bike lanes, and about 90 miles of signed bike
routes. The City'S Department of Transportation has a Bicycle Program that is developing
the City's first Bicycle Master Plan to improve and expand the network of shared use paths,
bike lanes. signed bike routes. arterials With wide shoulders and pedestrian pathways.
Marin County's Safe Routes to Schools
Today only 13 percent of children walk or bicycle to school. as opposed to 66 percent in
1970. According to a study by Marin County Safe Routes to Schoof. 21-27 percent of the
county's morning traffic can be attributed to parents driving their children to schoof. More
parents drive their children as a result of increased congestion near schools. further
aggravating the problem. These trends have seriOUS implications for both childhood obeSity
and respiratory problems, which are both rising trends. The Safe Routes to Schools
program promotes walking and biking to school in order to reduce pollution and promote
children's health and community livability, Since the program was instituted. single student
car tripS have dropped by 13 percent. saving over 4.250 one-way trips each day
Keene's Conversion to Biodiesel
From fire engInes to snowplows, all 77 of the vehicles in the City of Keene, New
Hampshlre's Public Works Department arc running smoothly on 820 biodiesef. The flcct is
fueled onSlte at the department's pump. The biodiesel performs well In cold temperatures
and has improved the air quality inSide the fleet maintenance faCility, The City has burned
more than 4.400 gallons of biodiesel since 2002, which prevents an estimated 12 tons of
CO2 from entering the atmosphere annually.
() Resources
General Transportation Planning Information:
American Public Transportation Association hllryf/\wJW aDI" com
Transportation Research Board htlD'llwww trh ora
Win-Win Transport Emissions Strategies - A paper from the Victoria Transport Policy
Institute lltlD:!lwwWVI ni_Drn!wwr.lllllate, mjf
Clean Air and Transportation Resources from the U.s. Department of Transportation
IlllDf!\NWW ItiJlfadc1...uD (Jov/rc<;ourrC"ifltldP.x ;)<;D
National Congestion and Travel Time Data from the Texas Transportation Institute's Urban
Mobility Report tllln/irnoIJililv,laf11l1.celu/um<;
Walking and Bicycle Planning Resources
IlllD ,/WWWVIDtClrn/c!nClI!11('llt<;!wo1ikinCl nllD; tllln IIW'\IVWf):kC-.vi~lk orn
section3
best practices & resources
ImmporliJrion '.Resources
conlimled
Transportation Planning Tools:
Travel Matters' Transit Planning Emissions Calculator: Quantify the Impact of transit
decisions on global warming pollution. An online tool for measuring the emissions Impact
of making transit buses more fuel efficient.
http'//wviI'Wtrllvclm.JtWrs ora
Center for Transportation Excellence's Transit Benefits Calculator: Estimate the co-benefits
of tranSit investments, An online tool that focuses on the local economic benefits of tranSit
Investments. Ilttn Ilwwwcftc orO!C?llwli1tor,1c,D
EPA's COMMUTER Model: Examining the BenefIts of Transportation and Air Quality
Programs Focused on Commuting A model for quantifying the emiSSions benefits of
strategies to reduce solo commuting,
httn:ffwww (>[xl,oovfol;lCI!'}tC1lr.rcsOllrcesinolicy!n(Jq trClIlc;n Iltm::CD
IClElland Use and Transportation Toolkit ~lllryllwww Iclf>i ora
Commute Trip Reduction:
Case studies from Best Workplaces for Commuters on creating commute reduction
programs from carpooling to parking cash out programs
11ItIJ'I/www bwc 9ov/pn1nlov/l1C:ncfll'i,lllm
The U.S. EPA has developed a Web-based Calculator to enable an employer considenng Best
Workplaces for Commuters to estimate (he financial. envIronmental. traffic-related. and
other benefits of joining the program. httn:llwww bwc oov/rC50urCf!/calc hll11
Car sharing strategies from the VIctoria Transport Polley Institute:
IlltO'!I\fIIII-Jwvtoi,om/lcll1lildrn7 hI In
The Car Sharing library - A listing of resources httl1:1/www C{Jr<,lli-HinU I1ct/librmvlrndC'x.hlml
Commute Trip Reduction - Ordinances/Resolutions:
Commute Trip Reduction Model Ordinance from the Washington State Department of
Transportation
hi tn://www,wSdot,\Va,oov/ldmitr lorCctllct ion/dowlllo<lcIlMortcIOrdiIlJllcd INAI ,doc
Transportation Demand Management Model Ordinance from the State of Minnesota
Iltl D' Ilserver (]ejmill ,stille, mil 1l':i/oof/2000!cnl)fModeIOrcjWI1ote I)df
Green Fleets:
The Clean Fleet Guide features tools to help fleets make ..green.' vehicle and fuel decisions
including speCIficatIons on available alternative fuel and advanced technology vehicles.
tools to perform cost analyses based on speCific locations. and information on otller
technologies that can help improve fuel economy, httn:l/vwJ\-'I/ ecrcellC.'f(]V nov/flcctllui(jc
Clean Cities is committed to providing coalitions, fleet managers. and the public with
accurate, accessible information. Data on purchasing alternative fuel and advanced
technology vehicles to emissions and fuel information.
htlo:!/www Cc[('.(~ncrnv (Jov/crc.~llcitic')l!oOI'i Info.lltml
EPA Green Fleet FAQ
1m!) 1/\NW'NCO(j C1ov/cmis'iwclJ/f3(J hIm
Green Driving Tips - Driving and maintenance tips for emissions reductions
blll1./fv.JINW trlDrH,t ortl/GrccnDrlvllKlflO'i pm
section3
rramporcalioll "Resources
CO/1(inUt'd
best practices & resources
Grecn Fleet. Ordinances/Resolutions:
Model low Emissions Vehicles Ordinance
!lIIO/lwl/'1l/v i1iroualll II orn,'mo(Je!(lrd/[ nl"'odir:M()d{~lI rF1C'f,tVl 0 IJdf
Model Greenneet Policy Ordinance from IClEI's Greenneets Web site
In tl):lIwww green' I~r;t <...orQiM;!l<cll Off IClal, 111ml ~ Writ P"/..,20YOllf' /,,200wtl
I1ttp:!/wvvw ctC.1Il,mroun!s nrn!font('l1f/(;rf'r~11 f 101"'1 Polic'J Ordinance Deif
The City of Seattle Green Fleet Policy
Illl o-llwvvwCll vol sCtllllc nct/rlwironmr.nliDoclllllcnt<;,/C leanGrl?('nr [['NAP m!f
The City of Seattle Green Fleet Resolution 11t!D/lwwwnrccnflr-cts oro/S('(Jtllp IHIllI
The City of Denver Green Fleet Resolution IltlO:llwwvI/ nrccnfl(>rt<) orn.'DcllVl'rRp.viscej,html
Alternative & Clean Fuels:
National Clean Diesel Campaign IHtlTllwwwc)eClnflrpISLJ"lJnct
Alternative Fuels Data Center Ilttn.,/wvvw ~cre enf'rr1V nov/.Jfdr:
Biodiesel Board - A national non-profit trade association t11to'llvl'NVoJ blQ(li~<;el_or(]
School Bus Toolkit tlltrrl/www eere enmClv nov/nfdr./anD<;ltoolkitJsr.t100! 11US 100111.11 tH1ll1
Transit Vehicle Toolkit hl1n:!/VJWwecre cllcrqvQovlafc1c/anDs,tooll<.ltitr:\I1~lt t}LJ<; toolkittllml
National Clean Diesel Campaign tllw:l/wwwr:lcanfl(~r.lsusanN
Pedestrian/Bicycle Resources:
Pedestrian Planning from the U.S. Department of Transportation
hll n:llwvNo/wa Iklllnlnfo, Off} '[)f:(j<;,lfc
Walking and Bicycle Planning Resources
htto-lllJ'l\NW vtni org!clof.ul1lent'}/willkinn nhD 11tlfJ'II'.WNJ IJlkCW.:11k om
Safe Routes to Schools tll11TllvNl/voJsaf('rolllc~tmctlools,or(]
Pedestrian/Bicycle Resources - Ordinances/Resolutions:
Exemplary Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans
tlttrJ:lfwww 11ir:vc!:n(llnfo (If(]fp[}lcxcmrJlilry hIm
Green Power
Best Practices
Montgomery County, Maryland's Green Power Purchasing
In 2004, Montgomery County led a group of local governments and local government
agencies In a wind energy purchase that represents 5 percent of the bUYing group's total
electflclty needs. Under the two-year deal. the bUYing group will collectively purchase 38
million kWh of wind energy annually. translating into a yearly reduction of 21,000 tons of
CO2, 95.000 pounds of nitrous oxides. and 1.4 pounds of mercury_ The County demonstrated
the benefits of renewable energy in meeting the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act
by Including the wind energy purchase as a control measure for ozone pollution in a State
Implementation Plan for air quality improvement. The County plans to offset the added
section3
Gwcn Power 'Best PractiCf)S'
contll1l1(J(/
best practices & resources
expense of the wind power purchase by instituting employee energy efficiency programs
such as turning off lights. computers. and office equipment when not is use.
District Energy Saint Paul Wood.fired Cogeneration
District Energy Saint Paullne.'s new $52 million combined heat and power plam uses
275.000 tons of clean wood waste fuel each year. Under a 20-year agreement with Xccl
Energy, the plant generates 25 megawatts of electricity. enough to power 20.000 homes.
The plant significantly reduces air pollutIon by displacing 110.000 tons of coal. redUCing
S02 emiSSions by 600 tons per year and fossil fuel derived CO2 emissions by 283,000 tons
per year. plus an additional 50.000 tons from efficiencies compared to on-Site systems.
District Energy IleatsJcools twice the bUIlding area vs, on-Site systems wIth the same fuel
input: serves 80 percent of downtown building space. including the State Capitol complex
and 300 residences; is the largest hot water district heating and chilled water cooling
system in North America.
Portland's 100 % Renewable Goal
Portland Oregon' local Action Plan on Global Warming sets aggressive goals for renewable
resources. instructing the City to acquire 100 percent of Its energy needs from renewable
sources by 2010 with an interim target of 10 percent by 2003. Actual renewable energy
purchased currently stands at around 1 1 percent. To meet the long term goal. the City has
Invested in hydroelectric turbines in its drinking water reservoir system and a fuel cell
powered by waste methane. Most significantly. in June 2003. the CIty purchased green
energy certificates representing nearly 44 million kilo watt hours of wind power - enough
to supply nearly 4.000 homes for a year.
Seattle City light's Net Zero Emissions Policy
In 2000. the Mayor and City Council mandated Seattle City light to meet all new electrical
demand WIth cost-effective conservation and renewable energy resources and achieve zero
net emissions of global warming pollutants. As of 2005. Seattle CIty light is reaching both
these goals. Seattlc has a low baseline of global warming pollution because clean
hydropower produces most of the city's electriCIty, But even with this green power, the
Lltility still produces some emissions from Its fleet and building operations. among other
examples. To reach zero net global warming pollutant emissions. thc utility mitigates for all
emissions by purchasing offsets; in 2004 and 2005, City light paid less than $2 per year
per City light rate payer for offscts tllrough a varlcty of projects. such as supporting
biodlesclln Scattle area fleets and contracting WIth DuPont Fluorochemicals to install a
technology that substantially cut global warming pollution. Maintaining these policies
avoids 200.000 metric tons of global warming pollutants being added to tile atmosphere.
e Resources
EPA's Guide to Green Power Purchasing - The Guide includes information about different
types of green power products. the benefits of green powcr purchasing. and how to
capture tile benefits of green power purchaSIng.
1111 p :ffw.w.J r.oa, nav!clrecnrJOwcr il)uY(lf CC'llOowcr foulcle. 11tln
Green Power Partnership - A program that promotes the purchasc of green power in the
private and public sector. I ltto ,lIv....'NW ('l)illJov/orr~!~1100Wrr
section3
Green Power "Besl Pmcciws
CO/lllflued
best practices & resources
Green Tags VS. Delivered Products - A primer comparing these two types of programs.
hi 1 [l't/VI/VI/W pml clOv/(]r( ~(~nlrmro[),1!ronl C'nt/rnc:mv!ndf /nrct 'nt;m'l [)(Jf
Green Tags hl'D'llv.jwwccn~ r>1lf"f(]V nov/fcmn/10,llllolo(llt~<;!r('ncw;)hle nurrtl(]<;cnowcr cflll
Green Pricing utility programs by state
Iltlollwww ('ef(~ p.ncrov oovfor('('nnowf'r/mrlfkr~hi[JnCIIl(l 511tml?D,'JOC 1
The Database of State Incentives for Renewable Energy (DSIRE) is a comprehensive source
of information on state, local. utility. and selected federal incentIves that promote
renewable energy. tlllo'f/www OSlrCU"i(J oro
Bonneville Environmental Foundation - Markets green power products to help fund
renewable projects. Illtn:llwwwb-e.f.orn
Green Power - Ordinances/Resolutions:
City of Albuquerque Renewable Energy Resolution
httn:ffwww c?ba nov/cnl'rclv/c1orurncnt<;/rec;otutlon329.doc
City of Seattle City light Resolution for Net Zero Emissions Citv IIQllt Net lr:ro Resolution
Energy Efficiency
Best Practices
Chicago's 15 Million Square Feet Retrofit Program
The City began to audIt and retrofit 15 million square feet of public buildIngs With efficient
eqlllpment for heating and cooling, lighting and ventilation. The 15 million square fcct arc
made up of pollee stations. libraries, fire stations, park facilities, tranSit facilIties, health
centers. community/cultural centers, colleges and other types of facilities that are owned
by the CIty, the Chicago Park District. the Chicago Transit Authority or the City Colleges of
Chicago, As of June 2004. more than 5 million square feet of city-owned facilities had
been audited and retrofitted. 15 million square feet is roughly equivalent to the size of
three Sears towers. When the projcct IS complete, energy savings to the City and its sister
agencies are estimated to be $6 million annually, WIth $2 - 3 million In savings for the City
alone. The annual savings upon completion estimates 30.000 tons of CO2, and 84 tons
nitrous oxides, and 128 tons of sulfur dioxide,
Ann Arbor's Municipal Energy Fund
Since 1998 Ann Arbor's Municipal Energy Fund has provided city facilities With a source of
capital for energy efficiency retrofits. The Energy Fund provides initial capital for new
projects and receives 80 percent of projected annual energy savings from each installed
project for five years. The five-year payment plan allows projects that have a shorter
payback to help support projects with a longer payback, and all savings accrued beyond
the first five years remain WIth the departments implementing the improvements. The Fund
was seeded by the city with five annual investments of $100,000, and quickly became self-
sustaining. Most installed measures have had payback periods of three to six years, and
projccts supported by the Fund have yielded a total of 685 tons of annual eC02 reductions.
section3
Energy EfflciC'/lcy "Bese Prawce5
comi/wed
best practices & resources
Seattle's Energy Conservation Measures
In 1998. the City of Seattle dedicated approximately $1 million to pay for cost effective
energy and water conservation measures in City buildings and facll1tics. An Energy Services
Company (ESeO) was hired to Identify. analyze and install conservation measures. The
program was managed by the City's Office of Sustainability and Environment and created
incentives for departments to participate by offering them the opportunity to save money
on their utility bills. which could then be applied to their programs. Energy effiCient
lighting and HVAC projects were completed in police and fire stations. community centers.
fleet maintenance centers and office building. and red traffic signals and pedestrian walk
signs were changed to LEDs. After three years. an independent evaluation of tile program
concluded that the City's investment was sound: the present value of net benefits to the
CIty for all of ttle proJccts was $2.5 million The internal rate of return to the City for all of
these tile projects was 14 percent, and the pay-back period is under six years.
e Resources
Background:
American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy - General Information
Illln:llwV'.....w ;:)f.C'e0- ora
DOE's Building Energy Codes Program is an information resource on national model
energy codcs.
tlttn'//vN/W 0-nNC1vroclcc; GOV
Energy Star for Government Agencies. ENERGY STAR brings your government agency a
proven energy management strategy to save energy and money while demonstrating your
environmental leadership,
!lttn'//www CnCffJy<;tar oov/inclcy. cfm')c=ooverllfllcnt bus nOvcrnmp.nt
ACHE Buildings Guide promotes the development and widespread adoption of energy
efficiency improvements In buildings. applianccs, and other equipment used in buildings.
tltIO'/lwwwilWrP.{)f(]!llullcllnq<;/llldey. IHm
Energy Savers take you directly to resources available across Federal agencies for
homeowners, contractors and builders. building managers. realtors, state agencIes, drivers
and fleet managers, and industry managers, IlltO'JJwww cll('r9v",1vCP::' aov
ENERGY STAR - Delta Score Estimator identifies the relationship between the percent
energy saved in a building and the energy performance rating score of a building using
ENERGY STAR.
Illln:JJIfoNoNJClltlrtlVSI,lr nov/imil'x cfm?c'-'clell<1 Inc1r!x
ENERGY STAR - Assess Financial Value by using the Financial Value Calculator to estimate
increased earnings from energy reductJons.
tlttn:l/www ellcr(Jv"tllr.(lOv/i(libll)llle~<JfinJn(i<l1 villue (ij!r:tilJlOr. xis
ENERGY STAR - Use the Cash Flow Opportunity Calculator to help answer CfItical questions
about energy efficiency investments,
111 I o:Jlwww cllenJv';lar nov/13/IJLJ"lncs<:./cfo c~lr.ul(11nr.y.ls
Energy Cost Calculators. The calculators below allow users to enter their own input values
(e.g. utility rates, hours of use, etc.) to estimate the energy cost savings from buying
energy efficient lighting and commercial, residential and office equipment.
hI tn :/JlNW\v ('ere cr ll:r Clv.C!nv/f pllllJ!nrOCtJf{'ll1prlt/pclJ 1'f.(:(J1ClJI;:ltors.cf III
section3
Energy E fficiC'ncy 'R(Jsourws
concifJ{wd
ENERGY STAR
best practices & resources
Energy Efficiency - Ordinances/Resolutions:
Comprehensive City of Albuquerque: Energy Resources t1tto:fII/JWWGlbo(Jov!C!lf'rc;lV
Chicago Energy Conservation Code
t"lt I [) Ifenovcl! Vorctllc.lnoorn/citv/w~ho()r ["I!nnrtalf" 11111 vHomf'Art Ion (jn?(,llt It VN:inl0.' Con.::,truc
tIOIl-nn<1.P(~rrnlts&(~Il! IlvNCln1rf nUmV.1lllc= 1 1.'4
California Energy Commission. 2005 Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and
Nonresidential Buildings
1111 nl/ww.....' ('1l1'HlVGl (Jovltitlr24/2005c:.tJllC1ardsI2005-11-03 400-03.001 F PDr
Energy Star Purchasing
Best Practices
City of Chicago Housing Authority Buys ENERGY STAR
The ENERGY STAR program enables public agencies to purchase large quantities of
appliances to help lower both manufacturers and buyers costs. Through a national initiative
of the U.S. Department of Energy and the Consortium for Energy Efficiency. public housing
agencies and utility companies in 38 Cities purchased over 70.000 Maytag brand refrigerators
that use energy efficient technology. By purchasing 10,000 of these refngerators. the
Chicago Housing Authority reduced annual electric bills by morc than $500.000.
Massachusetts Buys ENERGY STAR
In 1997. the State of Massachusetts began including ENERGY STAR standards In Its
procurement specifications for computers. fax machines. copiers. printers, and other office
equipment. Energy Star is a voluntary labeling partnership between the U.S. EPA and industry
ccrtlfYlng and promoting cnergy efficient products. The Energy Star label makes It easy to
identify products that save money and prevent pollution. and Energy Star products are
available from almost all manufacturers at the same cost as marc energy-intensive models
Thus the State of Massachusetts' procurement poliCY protects the environment without
compromising quality or price.
e Resources
Green Purchasing: A guide for local communities:
In r O:/llJI/VIfW,...t .llf~, ni us/dr:n/dt,r ibsc.t/suSI i1in,ll)lc-cornm!pnn oaf
Center for a New American Dream's Procurement Strategies Program
Helps U.S. state and local governments and other large purchasers incorporate enVIronmental
considerations Into their purchasing. Publishes success stories of pioneering efforts and
conducts training sessions and conference calls to teach purchasers how to identify and buy
greener products. lllio:lfwww newdrf~~m nr(J/[)for:ur~
Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Program and Database,
U.S. EnVIronmental Protection Agency - Comprehensive source of information on green
purchasing. Database includes green contract language and specifications. voluntary
standards and guidelines. and other practical information. 11IID/lw\I'NJ f'Oil,unv/nrJlltJc'flQ
section3
Energy Star Purcllitsmg
"Resources" corwnLJPd
best practices & resources
Massachusetts Environmentally Preferable Products Procurement Program
Information about state efforts to buy green products. including useful guides and reports
as well as contracts for purchasing recycled products and other goods.
tlttl1'llwVWI/ c,lCItc.ma ll~osd/cnviro/('nviro.lllln
Energy Star Purchasing. Ordinances/Resolutions:
City of Honolulu, Energy Star Purchasing Resolution
11IIo)!www tlonolulu oov/ref')/rr.looI/99-225 111m
City of Berkeley. Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Resolution - includIng energy and
water conservation specifications:
hI tn'/II/'NVVV l)c<;{'lfl"nf't .cominnr/doc5!mlfcha51I1n;'P\ J BPP l)df =scarch= %22cncrnv
o~ .20':itm'Y....20mlrrl1a";lnQ'~20or<1lnanr.co/ 20c.,~22
Green Building
Best Practices
Austin Builds Green
Whether remodeling a home or building an office lOwer, the City of Austin's Green
Building program helps community members. governments and businesses build more
energy efficient. environmentally sound structures. Since 2000. the City Council has
mandated that all new municipal buildings achieve a lEED silver rating. LEED accreditation
ensures sustainable site development. water savings. energy efficiency and green materials
selection, In 2003. 22 percent of new homes and four commercial projects totaling
145.000 sq ft, in the Austin Energy utility district were built in accordance with the
program's guidelines. Overall. the program has peak load energy use and the total 21.600
megawatt-hour savings equals a $1,8 million savings for utility customers. In terms of
pollution reduction. this means 8.343 tons yearly reduction of CO2,
Seattle's Developer Incentives
Seattle was the first city in the nation to formally adopt LHD as the design and
performance standard for all city projects and today Seattle has also developed strong
incentives for the private sector. Developers who pursue and achieve certification at the
silver. gold and platinum levels for new projects receive fInancial incentives and technical
assistance. In order to get significant bonuses to increase building height and density.
developers buildIng New Construction (LEED-NC) or Core & Shell (LEED-CS) projccts in the
central city core and adjoining areas must contribute to affordable housing and other
public amenities and achieve at least lEED silver certification, The City also offers financial
incentives and provides technical assistance on a casc-by-case basis.
c;pction3
Green Building "Best Practices"
COflCinued
best practices & resources
Chicago's Greening of City Hall
Surfacing the roofs of municipal buildings with greenery can not only reduce storm water
runoff. but also create large energy savings. The degree of savings depends on the type of
roof and the climate. Warmer climates offer greater energy savings because green roofs
reduce air condItIoning costs more efficiently than they lower heating bills.
The City of Chicago found that Installing a green roof on city halllowcrcd the temperature
by 3 to 7 degrees Fahrenheit. which translated Into a 10 percent reduction in air
condItioning requIrements. While the city's green roof was 90 degrees on the summer's
hottest days. neighboring roofs measured over 160 degrees Fahrenheit.
() Resources
U.S. Green Building Council's leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (lEED)
The lHD Green Building Rating SystemT!'" is a voluntary. consensus-based. market-driven
building ratIng system based on existing proven technology.
Ilt1D:llv'Iww uc;olKOro
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) is a widely
used international method of assessing building quality and performance In terms of
energy efficiency. environmental impact. health and operation and management.
httn'/IWNW brcp.<l11l orn
Green Building Program. Austin, Texas
The City of Austin has promoted green building through a city resolution adopted in 1994.
The program has a residential and a commercial component, which rates the follOWing
dwelling features for sustainabillty: water. energy. materials and solid waste.
III I D' I /\~N^^J flU';! inPIlr>rc Ivcom/l' nr>rovl}{.20r ffi(lenc\'/Proor~lm/Gr('P,n' . ,20Bulld inn/inclC!x III III
Scottsdale's Green Building Program - City of Scottsdale, Arizona
Program monitors and scores construction projects for approximately 150 green measures.
ThiS "yes/no" system is an alternative option to a "multi-star" program like Austin.
Iltlll:I/IN'NW CI,<;cott'Soale (ll,uslnrcf'nhuildinn
Green Building Initiative. City of Portland, Oregon
Their "Integrated Building Design" provides actions and opportUnities from predesign
through operations and maintenance. Their "Green Building Guidelines" provide specific
opportunIties in building design and construction practices.
IlltO:l/WNVV oortJandonlinc com/osd/lndex.cfm?c ,41481
Building Codes Assistance Project (For State and local Code Agencies)
The Building Codes Assistance ProJcct provides custom-tailored assistance on building
energy code adoption and implementation. It assists state and local regulatory and
legislative bodies. Ilt\[,-I/Vv'ww Ilr;m-enu(1.'i-Q!.D
Green Building - OrdinanceslResolutions:
City of Seattle's Facility Standards for Design, Construction & Operations including lEED
specifications
lit tn. /IW'NW (It V(lf~(:;1t tIC! IlI'lff el('!lit vrj(,vf:'loorl1l~nt/(le<;i(rr151,lrldmds .l1t III
Arlington County. VA requires a lEED Scorecard for all new projects:
Illln:l/wvwv' ,JrlI11<llon'JC) u<;/D(~rxlI trnClllyCPI10/Dl.lnnlllolzolllllCI/Ddf"..!7n:1 leeds nrlt .:t<;r>Nrtl_
... 221 H D',o,",20ordillilnr:c' ,22
section3
~l"
-...
--
~........-
best practices & resources
Water and Wastewater Treatment
Best Practices
Portland Pioneers Waste-ta-Energy Generation
The City of Portland. Oregon installed the world's first city-sponsored anaerobic dIgester
gas (ADG) fuel cell In its wastewater treatment plant in May 1999. The Fuel Cell Power
Plant converts methane Into electricity. generating power in a virtually pollution free
operation. Added benefits arc manifold-methane and CrIteria air pollutants arc reduced. as
is the amount of electricIty purchased from utilities that operate fossil-fuel burning power
plants. and the fuel IS free because methane is produced during wastewater treatment.
Portland installed a 200 kilowatts hydrogen fuel cell to help utlltze Its waste methane and
reduce power plant air emissions. The result of this pilot installation is a net reduction of
694 tons of CO2 annually - 14.000 tons over the life of the fuel cell. Efficiency for
generating electricity using a fuel cell is higher than most regional power plams at about
36 percent and when the usable heat is recovered, the rated efficiency chmbs to 76
percent. The fuel cell displaces the need for emergency generators or un-interruptible
power supply valued at $150,000,
San Diego's Waste-to-Energy
The energy savings incurred by the City of San Diego's Metropolitan Wastewater
Department help maintaIn lower sewer rates for Citizens wt"lite providing renewable electric
energy to the region. Eight" dIgesters" at the POInt Lorna Wastewater Treatment Plant use
heat and bacteria to break down the organic solids removed from the community's
wastewater. One of the by-products of this biological process is methane gas, which is
collected from the digesters and piped to the on-site Gas Utilization Faclhty, The methane
powers two continuously running generators that can each produce up to 2.25 megawatts
of electriCity.
o Resources
ENERGY STAR - Wastewater Focus
tlttn:fJV/INW cllcrCJv<;tarnovflnc1cx clrn?r~ oovcrnrnC/ll W.1~(ewn1f"r focus
The Integrated Waste Services Association (IWSA) was formed In 1991 to promote
Integrated solutions to municipal solid waste management problems including waste to
energy technologies
IlllnflWNWvvtc.om,lwCl5tc htlnl
PA Department of the Environment Drinking Water and Wastewater Operators InFormation
Center Ilttn:/fwwwdl'f),Sliltc 1).1 us/deo!dcQu(alc!walcronslrcdcs!(Jllhndr.xQood 111m
Online Energy Efficiency Calculators - Pennsylvania Department of the Environment
Drinking Water and Wastewater Operators
III (n' Ilwww drll. <;1 <-lIe nil llslr!rll/d"Olllilt('/WClI c((l[)<<,II~e<1{,51(ln/PAGLSILnr~rnYp(l(IC'iir !l(~rovr:<1
!culi1tor<; hUll
section3
.
.
.
,
.
'u
&1
,
. --
-.l. .'.;c z~- \. , ..
." L'-'r1t.' '1..,...
_"f -"-'f.~ _
:',
~....
".__t__ ~._~
"'---'. .,
best practices & resources
Recycling and Waste Reduction
Best Practices
San Francisco's Organics Collection Program
The City of San Francisco instituted residential curbside collection of organic material as
part of Its Fantastic Three program. The program provides each household wIth a green
cart for organic waste. a blue cart for commingled recyclablcs. and a black cart for all
remaining trash. Residents and businesses are encouraged to place all food scraps and yard
trimmings into the green cart. which is collected for composting at a regional facility, By
instituting curbside organics collection. San Francisco became the first large city in the
nation to collect food scraps clt)"Nidc. The fantastic Three program enabled the City to
reach a reported overall 67 percent garbage diversion rate in 2004. The rough outreach
and other methods. the CIty plans to expand the Fantastic Three program and increase
both the amount of organics and rccyclables collected, The program's expansion is
projected to achieve an annual cC02 reduction of 70.000 tons.
Seattle's Ban on Recyclables from Garbage
Since January 2005 the City of Seattle has prohibited the disposal of certain rccyclables
from residentIal. commercial. and self.haul garbage by law. The new recycling ordinance is
aimed at eliminating recyclable or compostable paper. cardboard. aluminum cans, plastic
bottles, and yard debris that. until recently. have constituted approxImately 25 percent of
the CIty'S garbage. The city hopes the new ordinance will save residents and businesses as
much as $2 million per year and keep future garbage costs low, as well as help to reverse
the recent decline In Seattlc's recycling rates. The measure is projected to achieve an
annual reduction of 260.000 tons of eC02.
Montgomery County. Maryland Retrofits a landfill into an Energy Source
The County installed a gas collection system for the Gude Southlawn Sanitary Landfill In
Rockville. MD The landfill was open for almost 20 years and collected an estimated 4.8
million tons of waste under 91 acres. Forty.four wells wcrc establishcd to feed an on-site
generation facility with two generators to recover the landfill gas and turn It into electricity_
Thc 1.500 kilowatt electrical generators are connected to the local power grId and
revenues is generated from selling this electriCity to Potomac Electric Power Company
under a 20-year agrcement. To date ratepayers have saved millions of dollars in capital
costs after the costs of installing the methane colfection system in the landfill;
approxImately 600 million cubiC feet of landfill gas is prevented from going into the
atmosphere each year. At 50 percent methane content. that's the global warming polution
equivalent of approximately 120.000 tons of CO2 emissions prevented. 20,000 megawatt
hours per year are generated-enough to serve an estimated 2,700 homes. Additionally the
County makes substantial revenues from the sale of landfill gas rights.
section3
best practices & resources
() Resources
EPA created the Waste Reduction Model to help solid waste planners and organizations
track and voluntarily report global warming pollutant reductions from several different
waste management practices.
lIt I [)' !{V05r:ln itc, (,!1<1, Clov/oar '(]Iubillw<lf Inioo Ilsffcomclltl Ar lrOnSW(l<,1 r.W ARM hI n11
EPA's landfill Methane Outreach Program (lMOP) demonstrates how to put waste to good
use. As organic wastes decompose in landfills, they produce methane gas. Wllich
contributes to global warming. LMOP shows companies. utilities, and communities how to
capture landfill gas and convert It to energy. 11ttD:I!W\NW CO;) (JQv/lmo[)
WasteWise is a free. voluntary. EPA program through which organizations eliminate costly
municipal solid waste and select industrial wastes, benefiting their bottom line and the
environment. WasteWlse is a fleXible program that allows partners to design thcir own
waste reduction programs tailored to thcir needs. Illtn.llr:na(]ov/w:-J',!('wi"C
Case Study on San Francisco's Food Waste Diversion Program
11110' Ifwwwciwmh,cn oov/F OOdW;l<;I e!Cil<;cSt lIctlcs/Conl rael s/2000/Silnf ran2 rn1f
National Recycling Coalition resources
hI I n:ffwww mc-recvcle, orCl/rcsourr:c\frcsourrc<;, 1-.1 m
Source Reduction Publications from the EPA
Illln'/fW\lVW,Cml oov!mswfsourcollb htm
Recycling and Waste Reduction. Ordinances/Resolutions:
Seattle Ban on Recyclables in Garbage
Illln:I/'MWJ_sc(Jtll(~,(lOV/utll/AboUI SPU/Recvclll1n Sv<;fr.m/lllstorv 8.. Overview
Ban on Rcrvrlal)lc<; III GJrl)(loe/rndcx B"iD
Aspen's Progressive Waste Reduction Ordinance, which Includes a "Pay as You Throw"
ordinance that charges Citizens for waste disposal by volume.
11ttO.f/WWW ilsocnOllkln cnm!ndfs/ejrDt<;/44Irecvclinq orcllll;Hl((!,ndf
Debris Recycling Ordinance, Glendale, CA
11t!D://VN./WciClI(:nrjC1lp.ca IIS/oubHc v,rmkc;/Constr Oem Dc;lJm R(x:vcllnn Ord
Education and Outreach
Best Practices
Burlinton's Community 10percent Challenge
The 10 percent Challenge in Burlington. VT is a voluntary program to raise publiC
awareness about global climate change and to encourage households and businesses to
reduce their global warming pollution by at least 10 percent. Enlisting innovative outreach
methods such as a musical road show called" Beat the Heat." the program is achieving an
estimated annual reduction of 1 ,500 tons of CO2 In the residential sector alone.
S8UI(Hl3
Edural/on and OuCrmcll "S1'5t
Practices continued.
best practices & resources
Vancouver, British Columbia's One Day Campaign
One Day is the City of Vancouver's community engagement process in support of Its
Community Climate Change Action Plan. The process is about taking small steps to reduce
energy use, at home and on the road, to make Vancouver the cleanest. greenest.
healthiest city in the world. The program emphasizes the small first steps that citizens can
take In our every day lives. One Day is working with partners - youth. community groups.
business leaders. to start this movement from the ground up. seeding the idea in schools.
workplaces. businesses. neighborhoods. coffee shops and more.
Seattle's Climate Partnership
The Seattle Climate Partnership is a voluntary pact among Seattle-area employers to take
action to reduce their own emissions, and to work together to help meet t11e communlty-
wide goal. An initial group of Seattle-area employers - the Port of Seattle, Recreational
Equipment Inc.. the University of Washington. Starbucks Coffce Company. Urban Visions,
Lafarge Seattle. Shoreline Community College, Mlthun. Garvey Schubert Barer, and the
CIty of Seattle - have come together to develop and grow the Partnership. These
employers are committing to take actions that will reduce their global warming pollution
emissions while at the same time cuttlng costs. improving the work environment for their
employees. and improving their record of corporate responsibility ]n exchange for making
and keeping this commitment, Partners will receive a host of benefits. Including higt1-
quality technical assistance. access to utility incentive programs, opportunities for cost-
saving collaborations such as jOint purchasing arrangements. and recognition for a job
well-done.
Salt Lake City's E2 (Environmentally and Economically) Sustainable Citizen &
Business Community Programs
Salt Lake City's innovative outreach program engages both citizens and businesses to save
money. improve the environment. and contribute to the City's livability, The Citizen
program challenges residents to commit to at least five things to ensure a sustainable
future. The business-oriented program is designed to recognize and support the Salt Lake
City business communIty and economy and provides some of the following benefits: cost
savings from reduced resource use: ability to attract new customers and increase customer
loyalty: free advertising purchased through grants and other funding sources of the Salt
Lake City Green program: earned media; reduced advertising costs in selected publications;
free consultation With Salt Lake City staff experts: and finally. the knowledge that their
bUSiness is contributing In a positive way to the enVIronment and community
() Resources
City Education Campaigns:
One Day Vancouver III I f)'IIV-NNJ OIlPt1;lW(]ll(OllVI'r Gl
Salt lake City E2 Program IIl!rrIlW\l'lVv slu]1...Q{'rl wm/[Xlol'<,/c2clllll'Il,lltll1
Seattle Climate Partnership I)t!o:!lwww SCiltllc nov/cl1ln,Jlcinartncr<;11in t)lm
secti 0 n3
best practices & resources
Educmlon and Ouc(mcl1
"ResourcE's cDllllflurd
City Education Task Forces:
Tucson Metropolitan Energy Commission. Tucson, Al
Commissioners representing many sectors of the community promote sustainable
development in the Tucson metropolitan area through support of resource-efficient
building codes and community education.
11110 1IW'WV'/tllc<;onmr.r. orn
Saint Paul Task Force. Saint Paul, MN 10 different city departments arc represented in the
task force. which coordInates sustainabillly decision-making throughout the city. The Task
Force followed the success of the group formed to gUide the Energy Conservation Project.
htln-llwWN CI.51naul.rnn lJ<;frirnls/r0,JloslolC
Educational Programs:
Education Curricula:
lelEI and the City of Berkeley created this educational brochure about climate change for
CCP jurisdictions to download off the web and modify. The City of Burlington. VT also
produced a brochure using the template
Ilttn:l/wvvw u:fcl ora/us/brochurct1tm
Global Warming Education: School lesson Plans. Global Warming Kids. Web Site dedicated
to: Global Warming Education Climate Change Education Science. Solutions and a
Resources Directory
hI t n:l/wvvvv (I im<'lt ccl1alln(>f'dlJrnt Ion. oro
City Best Practices:
The U.S. Conference of Mayors released a best practiccs book that covcrs the tOpiCS of air
quality. climate change, energy sourccs, fuels, vehicles and transit. housing. munIcipal
buildings, facilitics and opcrations.
11tl n :llusn1i1Vnr" orolt l\rrn/I)0.st Of;l(( iccsi~ I10.rGVSllrnrnlt BP06. fI<Jf
Climate Change Educational Information:
EPA Global Warming Site: The EPA Global Warming Site
1111 [).llvO'i(~mil c. pon nav/our/resources n<,f /Wf'l)<,ei11 C11?oDcnf or In
Frequently Asked Questions about Global Warming From NOM
11111)"I!www Ilcdc.no<'l:l.nov/ol/cllfll,ltf'/fJlolliJlvv'i1rlnincllnlnl
Regional Impacts of Global Warming
IlttD'lIwww ('n.1 oov!n\ol).1!wiHrnillnlimo:lCls!tndcx 11tml
Environmental Defense Fund's Global Warming, Myth vs. Fact
1111u:llwww edl nrfl:DlIhs;rQ(ISI1C(~t"/{' GWlar:t2 11tml
Global Warming Explanation
hIll) Ilwww IlCWSCit~11l1"t_coI1l/IlS0(u<:Jll1Sinl1t/nlolxtllfan,tltI1l1
Union of Concerned Scientists - Global Warming Science
t1ltn://vvvoflN uc')u~ orq/alolxll \rWHlll1llCl/sflcnce
appendix
The U.S. Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement
WHEREAS, the U.S. Conference of Mayors has prevIously adopted strong policy resolutions
calling for cities. communities and the federal government to take actions 10 reduce global
warming pollution; and
WHEREAS, the Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change (lPCC). the international
community's most respected assemblage of SCientists, has found that chmatc disruption is a
reahty and that human activities are largely responsible for increasing concentrations of global
warming pollution; and
WHEREAS. recent. well.documented impacts of climate disruption Include average global sea
level incrca~s of four to eight inches during the 20th century; a 40 percent decline In Arctic
sea-ice thickness: and nine of the ten hottest years on record occurring in the past decade; and
WHEREAS, climate disruption of the magnitude now predicted by the scientlftc community will
cause extremely costly disruption of human and natural systems throughout the world
including: increased risk of floods or droughts; sealevel rises that interact With coastal storms to
erode beaches, inundate land, and damage structures: more frequent and extreme heat waves:
more frequent and greater concentrations of smog: and
WHEREAS, on February 16, 2005. the Kyoto Protocol. an international agreemcnt to address
climatc disruption, went into effect in the 141 countries that have ratified it to date: 38 of
those countries are now legally required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on average 5.2
percent below 1990 levels by 2012: and
WHEREAS, the United States of America, With less than five percent of tile world's population,
is responsible for producing approximately 25 percent of the world's global warming pollutants;
and
WHEREAS, the Kyoto Protocol emissions reduction target for the US would have been 7 percent
below 1990 levels by 2012: and
WHEREAS, many leading U.S. companies that have adopted greenhouse gas reduction
programs to demonstrate corporate social responSibility have also publicly expressed preference
for the U.S. to adopt precise and mandatory emissions targets and timetables as a means by
which to remain competitive in the international marketplace, to mitigate financial risk and to
promote sound investment decisions: and
WHEREAS. state and local governments throughout the United States are adopting emission
reduction targets and programs and that this leadership is bipartisan. coming from Republican
and Democratic governors and mayors alike; and
WHEREAS. many CIties throughout the nation, both large and small. are reducing global
warming pollutants through programs that provide economic and quality of fife benefits such
as reduced energy bills. green space preservation, air quality improvements, reduced traffic
congestion, improved transportation choices, and economic development and job creation
through energy conservatlon and new energy technologies: and
appendix
WHEREAS. mayors from around the nation have signed the US Mayors' Climate Protection
Agreement which. as amended at the 73rd Annual U.S. Conference of Mayors meeting. rcads:
The U.S. Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement A. We urge the federal government and state
govcrnmcnls to enact policies and programs to meet or beat the target of reducing global
warming pollutIon levels to 7 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. includIng efforts to: reduce
the United States' dependence on fossil fuels and accelerate the development of clean.
economical energy resources and fuel-efficient technologies such as conservation, methane
recovery for energy generatIon. waste to energy. wind and solar energy. fuel cells. efficient
motor vehicles, and biofLJels; B. We urge the U.S. Congress to pass bipartisan greenhouse gas
reduction legislation that includes 1) clear timetables and emissions limits and 2) a flexible,
market.based system of tradable allowances among emitting industries; and C. We will strive to
meet or exceed Kyoto Protocol targets for reducing global warming pollution by taking actions
in our own operations and communities such as: 1. Inventory global warming emissions in City
operations and in tile community. set reduction targets and create an action plan. 2. Adopt and
enforce land.use policies that reduce sprawl. preserve open space, and create compact.
walkable urban communities; 3. Promote transportation options such as bicycle trails, commute
trip reduction programs, incentives for car pooling and publiC transit; 4. Increase the use of
crean, alternative energy by. for example, investing in "green tags", advocating for the
development of renewable energy resources, recovering landfill methane for energy production.
and supporting the use of waste to energy technology: 5. Make energy efficiency a priOrity
through building code improvements, retrofitting city facilities with energy efficlcnt lightlllg and
urging cmployees to conserve energy and save money; 6. Purchase only Energy Star equipment
and appliances for CIty use; 7. Practice and promote sustainable building practices using the
U.S. Green Building Council's UED program or a similar system; 8. Increase the average fuel
efficiency of municipal fleet vehicles; reduce the number of vehicles; launch an employee
education program including anti-idling messages; convert diescl vehicles to bio-dlcsel; 9.
Evaluate opportunities to increase pump efficiency in water and wastewater systems: recover
wastewater treatment methane for energy production: 10. Increase recycling rates in City
operations and in the community: 11. Maintain healthy urban forests; promote tree plantIng to
increase shading and to absorb CO2; and 12. Help educate the publiC, schools, other
jurisdictions, profeSSIonal associations. business and industry about reducing global warming
pollution.
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOlVED that The US Conference of Mayors endorses the U.S.
Mayors' Climate ProtectIon Agreement as amended by the 73rd annual U.S. Conference of
Mayors meeting and urges mayors from around the nation to JOIn this effort
BE IT FURTHER RESOlVED. The U.S. Conference of Mayors WIll work in conjunction WIth ICLEI
Local Governments for Sustainabillty and other appropriate organizations to track progress and
implementation of the U.S. Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement as amended by the 73rd
annual U.S. Conference of Mayors meeting.
references
U.S. EPA. Mobile Source Emissions: Past. present and future. August. 2006. Retrieved from:
III I [).IIIJvv1/w C'Dil.nov/mClo/invnt orV!OIJNVlcw/no!!\ II (lilt ~/in(Jcx _ III 01
U.S. EPA. What is Green Power? August 2006. Retrieved from:
Imo'llwww f;O!1nov!orcenDow(-fiwh;J\ Is/lndf~X 111m
U.S. ENERGY STAR Program. Water and Wastewater Fact Sheet. August 2006. Retrieved from:
!l!.!..J)'I/\fNIW ('Ilero",;!;]! (]ov/i(!/I)IJsilw<;<;/qovernrnf'rll/w01",lr~\V;ltcr fs oof
Seattle Green Ribbon Commission. Resources for local Governments: Taking Action. August
2006. Rctrcivcd from: htto:!/www<;cattlc (]ov!clllnillcl1:Jkll1oAction htrll
City of Seattle Green Ribbon Commission Report. Maintain Seattle City light at Net Zero
Greenhouse Gas Emissions pp. 20.
hi I n:!/lf,lwvl/. <;(';)1 t Ie. (lr)v/cI11llIlt c! PDr 'Sec!! t IC.JCI in1;JtcRcDon ndf
NVC Waste less: Energy Efficiency. Caset Studies. August 2006. Retrieved from:
tltt o.'IVfflW nvc .oov/html/nvcwa'it clc:ssllhl ml/f)l i'lor'flClc..,lcncrnv cfflr.if'nev'illtml
City of San Diego.Energy Efficiency Initiatives. August 2006. Retrieved from:
hI! o:!lVWJW <;;)11(1 ic:oo (Jov/mvl/v,/dhnjt jilt jvc"/cncrnv <'hunl
IeLEI
L Lo"t
Governments
for SU$I.linability
IClEI . local Governments for Sustainability
436 14th Street. Suite 1520
Oakland. CA 94612
w\\'\\.irll'i.org/u!'><l
"
0
:p Ia
.J:. ::l u ~ ~ ~ III ~
.... 0
0 "0 > N .,;
.J:J a. . ~ ~ ~. ~
.. ~
CII .... III 0 .. "
~ ~
U "iij .... 0 N i<l
::l c: 0
,,- III .~ "2 u;..; . .. 0 ~ ~ ~ ~
CII '" .... 'j; :: !:! l!. 0 "" .. " ~
.... u ::I z III ri !:l Ii ~
B ~Q.eoc
0 ~G~] III '"
.... " 0 c"'I ; ~ 8. is. !( c: "0
VI a. "0, ". ~"O
" ~ .~~-g ~ ~ '!! III ~ S 0 ,,;
.... '" _ 0 .
.... c: 5 E'o :. :;:; E"~
~ en 0 ..:: I:.l u U . III ~ /:"g
" .. l - ~
E -.t;;. !>II X c: 0 g]
CII "e ",'" c.- ~ " i " u
.5'0 E E ~ .... .l!
en E S::: ca 2:- i OJ u >-
.... ] , ~ 0 >-0
" '" 0 gill... -;:; . .... . o .
"Z ~ u ~.s-;: z u . ~ " c: u . E
.... V ~'; E] ~ .!: c
0 .... ~ ~ c:;
a.'" c: rf.~ ~~ '" g~
a..J:J ::I ou- a. o . 0
::lB ~ E 8..2 "',~ -
0 a. ~~~
VI en U ~ 8'~ ~ <I: ....."0
~ ~
c:
o
:;:;
V
OJ
....
o
....
c..
Q)
....
III
E
u
"
c:
III
....
<
c:
III
~
U
c:
o
0..
::I
o
c..
....
8
8
8
<8
III
III Q)
u :J
III
.3~
,,"t:l
c: Q)
1lI->e
en.::
C:-J
8
8
8
8
"E
....
III
3:
III
..c
o
C)
l
III
c:
~
c..
c:
o
0':::;
V
<I:
Q)
>
:;:;
V
OJ
:::
LlJ
OJ
.:.:
III
::E
~
"
.
u
~]'o
. 0
"E."C :':I
E g 'E.
8 ~:. 1::
] ~ _S ~
;~~~
t>IICIl.>.t:
::l'- ;.. -
],~-6t
::] "2 E
;;< '" caS
::l.Q-,""::l
U '" ~ l,.O
-;.5' E"5
== g. a ~
;~.~ c
u U ::I 2
~;,:] ~
<::: ;; tlI ~
o ,,; ~ E
'" 11 C U
~ ~ -E g.
r- c.1i.=
Q)
....
III
~
~
o
lI\
Q)
III
III
LlJ
.c
....
~
Q)
III
=>
>- ~ >-
c ~ 'i;;~-c
0"";1 u
~~ ~~]
0'" 0 CO,
~ ~ .~ = .~ ~
r; >.~c: E~
"O.Q~_UC
1:!~E]g~~
~ ~ E _~ ~ ~ <oS
l: = ;> :i = ;;I U
88 g. e-&.S.E
~
- ~ ~
a g g
~
~tg
.s so=...;
c.o""c'E
.5 ~:;; 5
E '" u"'::
ciS -E a 8-
.
oJ
2 ~
.g~
:g ~ 'ii
"'<;;.c
e]~~
... ... ell C
:2.5.~ ~
o~e;
.
. ~
~ .!!:......!l
U.c .S 0 ~
l.; - u E 2:':3
t>II~~;.e~~
)!l.c-.::;l'l::l:::l'-
5;~.g.;2
~~E_q~~
8. ;o:E~ ~'c
<a~'~-5~
.
! ~
II
I
I
/'1~
~~
~ I.
))
.
x
u
~
'"
x
'"
Cl
z
8"
....
0;0
....
o
III
Q)
V
....
::I
o
III ""
III
1lIC)
VI
..QC)
Q)"
.cC:
.... III
OJ c:
~~
~3
.co
3:0.
III
Q)
....
::I
III
III
Q)
::E
c:
o
0':::;
V
::I
"
Q)
~
~
:;:;
c:
III
::I
Ci
~
c
" 9
0-
0.9
.~~
E"
. "
00
:::.2
Ol;;
~-
0-
~~
~o
~~
ll.g~
..0
=:EV\
= ;;;; ~
~ 8. g
. . u
i~-g
... ~ ~
. . .
~ ~~
{~~
. . 0
u> :t
~ .9 :f!
<':I VI .2
<l,I .!I: ti
u.u ='
B ~ :""8.-:: ~
1>0-- ;t:
== E ~ <l,I ~
"5 v ';::: ~.~
.: ~ C ::'"E
~;;;E~...
~ti-E.:::c
"5 ~.~ -5 5 '"
:a ~ a 1;<.=8..~
C .::1 -
e,!:1 ~~";; ~
,!!!~.; ~ -g ~
~~.2~ca-s
:I~~~2E
-5 ~;,~ 6,g
lj ~ ~ 'a~ Oll
..c: -.- '" ::l'.=
;;~. ~ g c.~
."''''-oE",
~a-5~8~
.
~
,;
"0'
o 0
" 0
:i:~
-&,E
.
1> ~
~]
<Ii ~
c-
.:=..2
~~
a ~ ~
-! 0. U
e ~]
t.-~
o;:;~
"OE.::
o E .
lIII ~ ~
] a.~
=;;:;:,0;:
"5~~
~....;<E
.
.~
o
"0
.E
"0-"
c .
"2
.-
'u .;:;;
" "
.",
E ~
E.o
3"E
~~
o 0
u .
"O~
";;; :>..
u-
" .
>-~
.0.
.,]~
ot::l'"
.E >.~
"0 QO--
_,"0
.- v-
~~]
11
E
o
"0
[
o
"0
C
.
~2
;;0
0_
~<E
o .
.- .
8.
~
g ell
,~ g
o .
'5
~.
<; E
"""
o u
~.~ e
:; u ~
:::8 ~
t t t t
~~
~ ~
=.00
o _
O.
~:;r
'=<:;
'"
.
o
o
'"
2'
o
o
.
,;
"
~
"
"
5'
.
:>
;a
.
g-
O
o
g'
ii
.
]~
~.;:i
2:0-
.~
_ 0
~-
- .
o 0
o -
'" 0
~~
.g~
-g~
,,~
~o
:; ::..
3~
5'.
."
c3
"'g
m....
-,0
>~
.5'
.
.
o
~
~
.
.
ii
o
.
~
.
.~
~~
~R
~@
lit
,.
n.S!
;:00
.
.
~~
~, :;
~~
",
~~
p
;.~
!
j
.
~
.
"-
"8SlS~S;n
-:::I ::::>""0;:;....
~ [ ~ ~ ~. t!l
:::I ~ ~ s;;~
Iii; .... -. 0 ~
~;:j~g:ttn
c..oo =.> '" -t
9tr~~~ ?;
as-nClO'"'C
<:;'=.>:::1=...;:::
. ; ~Cl s->-
n;:rnC"ir
::... 3"0 >-
~ "Q. Vi.~ "'C
n ~ ~. i3 n
<">:::Ig",o
3 n '" n ,-.
Vi i;:;. o~.
'" =.> -t~:::I
g~~g2.
. -
8.!.~';~
~~. ~ g-s.
g 3 Vi.~:-
5l ~r.> ~o
o n ~..c l:
;:~~~
~o~:at..
:r~ n 5""
~;:re:~()
Po,< =-r
om
0_
0.'
~
cti@"'C"'t:CIJ
:::I, =1"0 E.. a ....;
1;~',. c~ >
c..S; ~ =. '" "':
:!lirg g 3 "':
~~~Q~~
'" Q,. '" :=.~. >-
oSa:.r-
;:i (; -'" >
... ~ O@
~~~Q (")
~ S. '" 0
g ::.."'Vi ~
g- ~. '> ; ~
~ -9 ;:::g t/l
- S - >!!!
a=n.....n
'8-< O~ ~
=0";-" C. Co..
Ei3~5--t
:::I !3. n n ~
'" Ill:l ~::!.
g ~ ~-:: ~
'" ::I 0 0 _.
~~~~::..
0", l:> =- >-
Ji S l:i g "'C
s!j 8 0 E..
5.l:>~;:::c
:r ~ g ~ g
n ",::,,:::1
>
.
fr-
. .
. ~
It.
j~
Lt.
f':;'
;-
\"',
....-./
Vl
~
"C
~
"-
>
r
>
"C
n
o
r
~.
3
~.
rt
(l)
0-
m
0-
~.
rt
o'
:J
~.
QJ
~.
Ei'
0"
CD
Z
o
~
"0 no.....,
a g ~ Q
c.."'n..,
g ~.g;"
~ 2.~ en
2':=:::13
: :.c :.
:::I :::I :::I :r
c..tii'i:>
"S! 3"B 1ft
~!=?..'"
o' o.;:r:;
S ~;'i ;"
;'i~C;:;'
;;:-~ = ~
0:1 0 '"
5l :;--g n
0_ III r
~::r::lr:'l
~;5:;:
n~~, ~.
:- on
~;;!~~
n>;g.
Q~~ ~.
lS ~.n.::"
::::>::1.:""0
~ n III III
e:;:as
!ll ~O:;;. ~
g'
;:,= ~.'8 ~
32.S-E=>
g ~-g-2.:g>
-.:::1 -
[00 g.g );
OQii.a. 5:
"Sg;'i~"'C
o.::r 30 n
5l g g 39
~~ l!J ;; ~ :r
el ~;::.fil ~
aE ~ [~.
e ~ !!!. ~ 2.
2.c.~~~
5.~.~;: ~
-"'C"'o
~ E.. ~5.~
...0 c if no
g. =;'~ 6l
::I"O!=?-
> g~~
,di 38.
n =.Ill '"
E g ;; g
:a, ~ i;;
<=i:?,
g.~
o
g ~r~ [:=:
:::1"0 <: _' J
~ ~ 3 ~'~
~3~~~
n:::l.-._
~:()~
_.:::1 r:-::I
:::Ic..t'l'lti
~~~.~
[;:g
g ~ ~ ~
~.!:!. ~ ~
g g.~, 5
~i;;fi-~
~ ~ ~ ~
-,0
III :r.- - l"""
~::i";;r ~
",lJ'Q;;: ::..
~o::m
~,~ ~ ~
:::l ::r ... _.
2: ~'~ g
n" -.:3
its~g
a.~, g. [
o !2: 0
] n .....
o ~
~ ::..
g ti: g Q 62 fi-~ :0 ~ :F ()
~~;-soiig~~~~
~. ~ ~ ~. 3 ~ g ~ ~ g. :;:
~!J'Q C ~ ~. c.. ~ 2.. ~ :::I 0
oo~c.. _~ =_'~-
=-rigno:;.tn::r;;ii
~3:::'~~:1i"'~-~:;'
. 3 '< _. n Cl n 5: Q III 0
0: n 5' g c..;;: ~. M - 3 ...
~:::I ",c_"'_oo",n
~ ~ 0 goo ~.~ ~ n=3.
_.n~o..cO n
:'$~~~~~13'::~
00 o~~-()~ ~ ~
;'i =::I.-<rO:::llJ'Q
... o!'> !!! ~ ~ ~
3
L~i
(]:::
f~:
.
p'-
'1'
- -
, ..
1t.
\--
..'''.
l!~
,
,~
,- ,
'_/
VI
o
;:;-
~
III
.,
<1l
C
<1l
<
<1l
0'
"'C
3
<1l
:l
....
"
III
.,
....
:l
<1l
.,
III
g
3
'"
~
rtl
."
,
o
~
rtl
n
~
0'
='
'"
='
a.
~
,
€'
~,
~
'<
C-
O
5'
::c
'"
='
a.
'^
u u u u u
h3::::::~
r:: ~ So 5' Cl3.
:::l " 0 n
Cl 00 C "" ::r
8" g ;; 5 ~
S. ~ 8".0 S
s-;s~!J'Q
n :I l: =. n
g-g ~ ~ ~
~'~: R~. E-
O' '" :; g !;;
n_ ~ ~ ~
~~n
3 -.... '"
=.> O!J'Q 0
n 2.. ii :;.
g' ~
"
3
;;
~
"
o
~
o
"
o
3
o
~
~~ ~~
"8gn~
~sos.~
~ ~ *;;;
~~ c.."B
e;-<~
3Jlg
;;; ~ ~
~. 3 '":r
g n 0
.0'
. ~.
- - <
. ~.
III n ~...
g-."I
'" ~ ~
0" 0
..:;:!:g g-
o ' 0
~g~
n g.!J'Q
~-:;l e;
. ='
3 0 0
&l;;: gj
:;: ~ 0
n !:! B:
s~ g
~
o
"
,;
.
~
1i
o
J>,.n
n III
::;-n
~"'C
III ,
-. III
., 0
~;:;-
? ~
o .,
., <1l
UCl ~.
n
~.
o
.,
UCl
"5l >,.,
o . .
",.'"
; ... =-
~ !!!.
~ =- o.
sri;;
~ ~ g
.0.
.... Q S
!!!:"O :::l
~~~
o 0 ~
::..r III
~. ~r =;
~ "Q."'g
::"3~
. . "
" 0 0
;;: ~ Iii
;;r g. e:
000
o " 0
3 0 3
5'~ ~
"'"'"
~.~ ~-
~3~
~ga
~ ::. ~
o.:::l:r
.
.
3
0:
"TI
o
.,
:l
....
o
.,
3
III
....
cr
:l
.
n:E
_. =r
3,<
III
.....:l
<1l ....
,,<1l
.,UCl
o Ql
.........
<1l <1l
~>
o' ::;.
:l
." "
o
C
!:!.
o
:l
~.
....
=r
VI
o
......
.....
~
III
.,
III
n
III
III
:J
>
-.
.,
III
:J
c..
n
-.
i":i
rl..,
,1'''''
VI
-i
)>
"
"
>
....
>
,...
>
"
n
o
n
~
~
~
3
III
.....
III
"tl
.,
o
.....
III
n
.....
o'
:J
1 1 1 1 -000 l> "'lJ n
00 ~ n
:=~ 0 .., - r-
~
~, g. 0 CD Do
P " fTI _. ='
:l g 3 ~ I"'t' DI :I
c: ., < 0 a.
<1l III < ",rtl;;;- CD :J
III <1l II>
"'C ::J~m -l
:l III c: :l n )>
.... III .... Q.Vl-5" )>
:::; ., I"'t' "
<1l .... 0 ~ro"'C "
'< <1l ., _. _. )>
o a.' 0
> '< CTC~ .., ....
;>J " )>
<1l n 0 III Q,l n..... :J r-
... -rtl=, DI )>
VI O' :l ~ I'D G, "
c: n Q. \n :J n
;::; :l iii' '" 3~ 0
"TI , a.
III " III 0 ~, ij;' - 0 ~.
'" '"
~ ., =' _. ~ -1\
:l <1l 00 0", I"'t' n
n =' ~
III III '" .rtl ~ -
II> ~ _.
... ;;;- '" 3
'" =' DI
fTI ~ a. ..,
3 n 0- DI
'" CD
III c: n I"'t'
!!l. '" ~ CD
rtl
0 e!,
:l
II> ,
Cool Cities Across America
All over America, communities are taking action to help solve global warming.
From hybrid vehicle fleets in Charlotte, to green buildings in Austin, and homes
powered with renewable energy in Seattle, local governments are moving
forward with illliovative energv solutions that curb global warming, save
taxpayer dollars, and create healthier cities. At a time when the federal
government is failing to act, these local leaders are moving America toward a
safer and more secure future.
So what is a Cool City? These are cities that have made a commitment to
stopping global warming by signing the U.S. Mavor's Climate Protection
Agreement. The Cool Cities campaign helps cities turn their commitments into
action by pushing for smart energy solutions.
To find out whether you live in a Cool City, click on your state or search by
your city. To get involved with a Cool Cities campaign in your city, network
with citizens taking action nationwide, and gain access to campaign resources
you can REGISTER HERE.
The Cool Cities website is currently down. This is the cached version of the homepage.
tj,
City of Seattle
Greg Nickels, Mayor
US Mayors Climate Protection Agreement
How many mayors have signed the Agreement?
As of January 18, 2007, 367 mayors from both political parties representing over 55 million Americans in all 50
states and Washington, D.C. have signed on. Mayors of seven of the ten largest US cities have signed along with
mid-size and smaller cities.
What does the Agreement do?
Mayors who sign on to the Agreement are making a commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in their own
cities and communities to 7% below 1990 levels by 2012 through actions like increasing energy efficiency,
reducing vehicle miles traveled, maintaining healthy urban forests, reducing sprawl and promoting use of clean,
renewable energy resources. The Resolution also encourages the federal government to assist cities in sharing
best practices on local climate protection programs. The Agreement also calls for Congress to pass legislation that
sets meaningful timelines and limits on emissions through a flexible, market-based cap and trade system.
What is the connection to the US Conference of Mayors?
The US Conference of Mayors (USCM) unanimously endorsed the Agreement in June 2005 and now urges all
mayors to participate. A partnership of the USCM and ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) was
formed to help participating cities implement the Agreement and to track progress. A Mayors Council on Climate
Protection has formed under the auspices of the USCM that will provide oversight and work on climate protection
policy at the federal level.
What's happened since the USCM Endorsement?
Cities throughout the country are taking action on climate disruption. In addition to the US Mayors Climate
Protection Agreement, there's been a lot of other activity, such as:
. Coordinated state leadership in the Northeast (the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative) and in California to set
emissions targets and implement cap-and-trade systems.
. Major business leaders, including several Fortune 500 Companies like GE, DuPont and Wal-Mart have made
strong commitments to clean energy and emissions reductions.
. The US Mayors Climate Action Handbook (www.iclei.orq/us). a short resource guide for mayors to take climate
action was launched.
. Building on the Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, the US Conference of Mayors endorsed the 2030
Challenge,
Why is this agreement important to mayors?
. Mayors recognize that climate disruption is a distinctly local issue and that action is urgent. Cities throughout
the US are already feeling major climate impacts-and citizens turn to their local governments first for help
during droughts, extreme storm events, dangerous heat waves, floods, and wildfires.
. Mayors know that actions to reduce global warming pollution provide additional benefits that are important to
the quality of life in American cities, including cleaner air, decreased dependence on imported oil and gas,
more livable and economically vibrant communities, healthy urban forests and reduced energy bills.
. Mayors understand the needs of their constituents. Public opinion polls demonstrate that citizens across the
country know climate disruption is happening (more than 85%, according to a Time/Stanford poll in April
2006)-and they are calling for quick action.
. Mayors know that taking action now reduces the impacts - and costs - of climate disruption.
Visit www.seatt/e.aovlmavorlclimate for more information,
including participation forms, media coverage, climate resource links and the latest list of signers.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
n..m'[I1."..I...~...... .................. .....
~~~
Request for Council Action
Date: May 14,2007
Item Number: 5.i
Department Approval
Manager Approval
@
Agenda Section
Item Description:
Direct City Commissions and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to review
Cool Cities Initiatives
Background:
At the March 19, 2007 City Council meeting members of the RAHS Earth Group Environmental
Project came to the City Council Work Session to encourage Roseville to become a "Cool City."
By becoming a Cool City, Roseville would make a commitment to reduce the City's
environmental impact. Mayor Klausing signed the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement.
Becoming a Cool City requires action. It could include conducting a baseline emissions
inventory, inventorying water consumption and water quality management practices, adopting
emission reduction targets, implementing local action plans and adopting policies to positively
impact the environment.
A list of cunent activities that the City to promote a healthy environment is attached.
Many news actions the City could follow would be no cost or low cost. Some actions may take a
financial investment. Several Imagine Roseville 2025 goals address environmental concerns. By
adopting the Cool Cities initiative, the City cau work to achieve these goals.
. Roseville is a desirable place to live, work and play.
. Roseville. residents are invested in their community.
. Roseville housing meets community needs.
. Roseville is an environmentally healthy community.
. Roseville supports the health and wellness of community members.
. Roseville has a comprehensive, safe, efficient and reliable transportation system.
Council Action Requested:
Direct City Commissions and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to consider initiatives
and to make recommendations on activities that the City of Roseville could undertake to help
meet Cool Cities standards.
RCA Page 2
May 14,2007
I Current City Activities that Promote a Healthy Environment
2
3 . When remodeling City Hall and Public Works we took advantage of natural light to
4 reduce reliance on artificial lights. Lights are on timers and sensors which turn on and off
5 automatically. Heating and cooling system are highly energy efficient. The City captures
6 "waste heat" and uses it to help heat the PD garage.
7 . The City built a state of the art sand and salt storage facility to prevent waste and runoff.
8 . The City uses organic fertilizers (when appropriate) on City property.
9 . The City promotes native grasses on City property and at residents' homes. Native
10 grasses do not require as much maintenance, water or fertilizers as non-native species.
II . The City enacted an ordinance to regulate the use of phosphorous fertilizers on private
12 and public property. The City requires cOl11111ercial fertilizers applicators to be licensed.
13 . Roseville's snowplows have the technology to ensure that we use the minimum of salt
14 and sand on ice necessary to keep roads safe.
IS . The City sweeps City streets at least twice a year to remove litter and prevent it from
16 getting into lakes and streams. Debris is screened and sand is reused.
17 . The City retrofitted traffic signals with LED lights to dramatically reduce energy
18 consumption.
19 . The City is committed to preserving green spaces. The City meets the requirements to be
20 a Tree City USA. Each year the City plants new trees and shrubs on City property and
21 makes trees and sluubs available at a lower cost through the Friends of the Ramsey
22 County Parks program.
23 . The City has made a strong commitment to residential recycling. The City promotes the
24 use ofHHW disposal sites, compost bins, rain barrels, rain gardens and the Twin Cities
25 Free Market. The City sponsors a clean up day to help residents properly dispose of
26 unwanted items.
27 . The City works with the Met Council and the Housing Resource Center to help residents
28 make their homes more energy efficient.
29 . The City received several federal "brownfields" grants to assist with cleaning up
30 contaminated propelties.
31 . City staff practice good recycling/reuse measures including purchasing recycled paper,
32 electronic distribution of documents, using reclaimed paper and two sided printing,
33 recycling and compo sting.
34 . The City considers fuel economy when purchasing vehicles; however, vehicles must meet
35 their intended use which takes the highest priority.
36 . The City maintains paths to encourage walking and biking. The City is taking part in the
37 Ramsey County Walkable Communities program studying ways to encourage residents to
38 rely less on their vehicles.
39 . The City is currently studying the feasibility of a geothermal heating and cooling at the
40 Skating Center.
41 . The City is a member of Mimlesota Materials Exchange which allows businesses and
42 govermnents to give away reusable materials that the City no longer needs.
43 . The city passed a Shoreline Ordinance to protect the City's groundwater, lakes and
44 ponds.
Roseville Public Works, Environment and
Transportation Commission
Agenda Item
Date: May 22, 2007
Item No: 6
Item Description: United Properties Applewood II Proposal
United Properties has indicated they are ready to move forward on their proposal for a senior
coop housing building at 3010 Cleveland Avenue. This property is a large, wooded,
undeveloped parcel fronting Cleveland Avenue and adjacent to Langton Lake Park on the rear.
There has been considerable staff discussion with the developer regarding access to Langton
Lake park ballfields, as indicated in the Park Master Plan. The attached concept plan is the latest
version that may provide the necessary access and potentially could be connected to future
redevelopment to the south.
Alex Hall of United Properties will be present to discuss the concept plan as it relates to access,
traffic, trails, storm water, wetland mitigation, and other environmental concerns.
Recommended Action:
Indication of whether the Commission supports the concept plan and statement of other
concerns.
<>
I
<>
j
----
BRENNER
AVENUE
C[J CO OJ ----
ED [8~ clJ
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:~
--lr----------
-,ui
---~-------------
I
I
I
...
:::>
~
;
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
.
DG
dJ
E ISTING PROPERTY LINE
..
o
~ HEAVY LANDSCAPING --
..
4- STORY SENIOR CO-OP BUILDING
TOTAL OF APPROX. (93 - UNITS)
ARK
Lmm-mmJ
-'
..
CJ
,
,
,
,
,
,
NORTH
]1"=40'-0"
o
o
8
~----.----~~--.--~~--~---------
..
D
~----------------~---
I
I:
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
CITY PARK
...
..,
..,
..
~
~
~
Q
J,
~ Q
~ 'r'
~N
~o:;~
.~.~~ .;
E:~~
~~..!
~""'Q
~:a3!
=:!3~g;
~~.~~
co
".!
~~L
~ E ~ 0
~~~~
~s~1i)
"' " ~ 0
,,0"5
H~'O
~h' ~ ~ ~
EH~ i
imlb I
~~.!!g in
Hi5~ E
:: ~ ~ ~ i:l
{g lif ~~
"
9
o
u
w
c
z
6
"
o
o
----- 0
.
w
"
" ~
~ <t
"
m
o
"-
Ob
~-'
"~
ZJI
5"
"~
~ ~(3
~ (OJ(/)
jo~"O
06-40
Roseville Public Works, Environment and
Transportation Commission
Agenda Item
Date: May 22, 2007
Item No: 7
Item Description: Pathway Master Plan Discussion
Since the mid- 1980s, the City of Roseville has considered non-motorized trails to be a
significant part of its transportation plan. During the Vista 2000 strategic planning process,
Roseville residents called on the City to continue to develop additional multi-modal systems of
transportation with emphasis on non-motorized trail systems. As a result of Vista 2000, the
Pathway Advisory Committee was created. This group ofRoseville residents developed the
Roseville Pathway Master Plan. One of the major goals identified in this plan is the integration
of the local system with the larger regional system. The group identified and prioritized 20
different pathway segments for construction that help complete the City's pathway network.
The Roseville City Council adopted the Roseville Pathway Master Plan in 1998 and it was added
to the Parks and Recreation Systems Plan, which is a section of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
This plan identifies and ranks a number of pathway facilities as critical to the area pathway
network. The priority ranking for development is based on criteria created by the Pathway
Advisory Committee. The criteria evaluates the pathway segments based on their ability to;
connect to multiple destinations, connect to the regional system, eliminate safety concerns,
expected usage, compatibility with adjoining properties, impact on adjoining properties and ifthe
segment filled a void in the system.
In the interest of achieving the goals set out by the Pathway Advisory Committee, City Staff
pursues alternative funding mechanisms to construct the recommended pathway segments.
The City's Pathway Advisory Committee last updated the plan in 2002-2003. We have included
the Master plan map. The other documentation was sent via emaillate last month.
Recommended Action:
Discussion of the current plan and of future actions and process to begin update of the plan.
,:,.
CITY OF NEW SRIli#l/;!"
l:l/~~III
"~ndentl ~ ..It,
..~. Ptrlf. ...'f
./,,' .
tf",... .l
d~ I
i~~#
V
"II
~,
~I
".
~I
o !
~I :
~
!
I
I
r
,
~I'
S,i
.I~
~l= !i
Ell .
:!: ll:t: ~
-b....r...... t
~
. ....
I
li'"~.~.
i ' \
Ii )'
it /),,~
.1/.% W...
i~ Vi ~!
ILJ
~
,
I
,
I
,
~I
~.
~I
..
~I
"
0,
t
o
,
~
.
o.
..
~
~
.
--
I~~
Print".!: Jal1lli0- 8.1002
l3ascd 011 origiOJ:l map ,"(lIUenl
datc:d S~ptcmtx:r 8. 1998
.'
IIOADC1
~
~.^'
i
.
.
!
!
"_.~30~
~-,
"""
C"",""
CrTYRfjil/lBDEN HILLS
"~.,I', ' I ~.,~
.....~ .
! ;,.0 t't. ltQOOl.'nfN .~~ ,
= ~ cu._ "
~
. !
. i . H
~ .. ~ : .
8RSiHS1I,,! ~E1U'lf.
- ,..:."
J l::;~ltMA
I"D -,....,. ,lJI~
.... ~I
J f1lr~~
l-~-
, ....' ~
~
j
if
.
i
&
'~I/ ;
~
~ : :;
=1--- 1Jo~
)~
~ Norl"-uem
~~
I "'"I,
...
5
l!-
.-
~
~ I_Ell
j .
"'.go
." ~"
~'-. )i
MUlE~U~~~r
I-.~"'\:.
~.,.~..t.nlc CI a
CENTE~...,...... ...
M ,
.
.
i~
TAHB.IlIDGE
/
i
-
.
~ ~
: !
~
;
~
~
g
~
~
.
;:
;;I
M
,,_..
,.
"
"
..
./
(
~,
!"
i
IL..oi
!
!
,:n~
" !'::'1
. i
'--
.
~
~ OAKCRur
i
.\\\\
-
~!
.so/, 0
. ,
AI/\!" 0 ..
1.1
!
i.
--
~
\
.
_.,
Mrlt.f/fpi_1
IWI'fiR1~/It
%r'
i
\A'/
~
~
.
I i ~
V' )"
J
Q~( ~~
~ '{ -.... .II:
)~(~~
SGLl.oEJ'(LH
,,~UEI{l.N
~!
I-"-
~
i
,
!
~
~...
!
'1
=U
5!.1
~...
~~:;I
...... >
-.,
~
~
"$H.UIOIOll.E F~,w
i ..~ ! ccrlt~u;rr
.~
~
I~~
o
!
i
.r-
~!lL~
Har-Mar
M..
...
~...
...
"".
~
.w ~
.w
;
~
~-~
.
:;
AVE 1I1llOGE1OOOO&,N
l; I I )-
~ ~ J~Uf
AVE HClo.ucSUf ~
ii, I ~
.w
~6.,
OIW'E";
~ OR ~.
,
!I: ~I
.,~
"'~
.
!
! ~
~
I
....
IlCISELlMt
I City Parks/Golf Courses
.- ..,
Major Commercial
,
Wide Curb Lane > 1,000
Shared Lane < 1,000
, School5iLibrmy
Civic Center Campus
&W/OllutlmllledADT[or2010
... "
-
.. .......-
'l"'~
t ."wIt
...
Josephine
'"
,
Lake
l
!
...f'OOCl ...lIt"
P
!
.J"': ~~
r I STer
~;:1( ,.
.
~
!
"
>-
~
!
-,I
UI =::::
........
AVf-.-"
... ~
LN 51"_01
~
......".
~
~~
...
. -'J
"'Vfiln-~ ..
,
!~
:tIllOSB.JI1Mo'
'1'
" 1 .
I ,.'
~" r
~isi,
,
1-
~
.,
~
. .
I~~E
,
i
I
.--
AlIf"IL~
. "'"
"'_ A
if;;.fIrD_~
~"."l-
~ .
~
';;'a-.-
.."~
."_It
'"
...
:;
..
o.~
.-.
--,.
.
ih:"
"-~
~-
J
~...
,~"'
.....
...
,
i;
([f,,ol SHOREVlEW
::; ....-
~
,Jq
i- ~
i foUKOOO
~ !
""""'"
!
.
.,
/ ~I 11<
l~
.~
_IV' "'\Il!~
~::; .. p-
~ RrAN AVE i~r.~
VE ~ I""'"
fM~-:: !
.
. .
"
S .ni1ln
-
...
, .
DION"E ST ~
.
!
.
-!!
,
~
e
~
~Rams~ C~,,1.i~lc Works GIS
.CllY ofRoSC\1l1c GIS
.CiTy ofRo5e\,lIe Parks & Recreation
~
...
~
.
f; ...
,"
~
~
t.
.
.~
~V
{
~
.....--
~1iRSI
W~ST M=
-.
.....
-
1
-..
eo_
,-
!
."
" ~
~
~~ .
'-~
~
I "- ~l::""" !\" ,,:;.
il i ::~ =IAVE Q ! RT_
il ~ ! ~"~ I I'l
i ~I~ i i~ ~I; ~ : it I
erN OF LAUDERO~Ml I A.'K - IldUI...A.-tf CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS -
ProP~~7h~E:~~!~:.:work
/'../ Multi-Use Path> 10,000 I
/'../ SidewalklBikelane> 5,000
/'V
~
...
~_. ._~
L'
..110 ","'~
" '..l
1-
:;!A'o'E
Cm'O
i=
.
~~
IllClGf ::;
, ~ '~\'~ ~f1~~ ~7-'"
~~-~ ~- #" ~ ! IJi2:1 &..
'" ~,._'-"-"J.'
\\ '''-'7ii1 .
............ ~ ::~ i
~'", " ,.: i ~
~ ~'T- ... ... '"!. lIopt__'1 i
~,+, Ow~.l.!!!:!:!..coc..r. '" "j ~ ~......=. .. MAA,"
_.,~' -. , ~ I ~
'* <P. r -"-;" ~ UOITEIo/'IlAt D! ! ::; ::; :; ....
I ~CE DI.
~ '
OR V1R~C.t ~ ~l= .NOITH
C< "',
~
6.",101 AVE
I~- ...~:
;) ~ i
~ -c ~ ~ .
cr I ;0
~ Ro_C_
.0
ifi
0"
i
!
~
~"
~
...
$1, ..\ ~.
::; '- ti "'Il~_.
~ ~_...
~ ' -~~ I
!:II
-
~I"
0>
.~
~
.A'
~~
~ ! d
lS- L ~
:wlCllf&r ..." r
~ ~ ... :....
!; ~ ~ ~ l'il~ \'.
;11!5!11~!"~;lj~; ~\l1II~
! I I 0 <>
, -
::: ~ .....
.
I
.o:.:!1ii
m~
", .
o
.-
0..-
i
MCRESTA
-=-;..;~~~ :::"
A;,!h
ll.....SEXfAIiT
u:TANT ti ""':i~~i.
~ c..r,.,... ~r
-., C<
-~ii ~
,;::" ~I~ . ~~J"'I,"-' t'"
_. "-- ' .~l,._ "
=-- "'~~.~ 0 j" ....' ~
-.. Ii i! h 15
_NfSOT.t ~~ ~i Oi Oc: =\"0'1<
=:'t.-; 'Os..S ~\IJeW AVf~il ~ ~ Il'f
~M'i ~~[<"'~'G...~ __I:
i 0: ~ .::::.;, i ~ ___
Q;! !~ lh ..
it..
.
I.'~...!t
. M
i= ...,
-4. c::=
~
--
r. ~i~OO'I'
... ~'
']., ~.
--. "
,*"",RAI'!'.~ '~Ill.\ID
>'t' /I'''olN~I''''''1
YAJi~" L
8
~
..cc.tAAON S1 ~
\l~~< '
"\~\. ~ ~
~, 0
~
l
~
& ~:; :;
II'
I:
.~~ ~
C'c'.... "'....
-.:. .
I
"
!
~'R'_
...
.
u_
""'''
4,
'-cC
Q/;..o
/ ;-'<'1'
"'-Q'.(e
~-
.-
.I ,~
ji ~
~.. GLEMOOOO
w~~.omt 1~~V!
"..
..c.~
"'"
~-
....,~,- '
"l' '1' -.
t ...
""."
LJ!'~
.
~
.
.
--
~
\
i
I
--"'"
,s$:
. g
.
~
"0'" 400 800 1200 1600 :zooo Feet
0-
prOject pathmast_2001_upd8tes,apr
map: appendtX_12_systemylan.pdf
~.~
'---
.
~ I .
.-' ...... '/'
A !:; ~ ~.I.~
t!~, l
I . ,,;;;.. Sandcaslle !
" / Park
" i
~I~~
" "':.
II" /
l_n.
8
~I!O
!
c
~~
~
,
,
i
!
!
--..-
o
;M(\
~
~
E
~"
i'
I
IoO&CU:
7~1!l
- I
"-I
-.
-- ...
/
I
I
i
-,
,
,
,
1/
:;
/
I /.
1/'\
//~ -
//~!~ofl.;;- __
'" ,t' ....
· Z/ /;,/'" · " "
HI, ,.""// .'., I"
..~.,.~ l .
,160 . - ~
" ~
I!
F
,.00
G
,jM!
1
i
;
70JO
.
~
.
!
J'1-
i
.
I
I
.-....-....
,_..-...:t...
i
~ -
.
I
I
.--
..'--
1_.
.
. i II ;!
-Llo_ii
_u_
J
'9](1
"I
::1
21
2
~I
3
"
~
....."
.i'l!
; i
f . f
__.I .!
--.....
-.
~!~~-
! i i
,/
, ~~'\
"/
.
~.
,.'
.'
&
'Langton
lLake "
Park ./
......t~"'!'~
-
""tlOOI._~..,,"
,-
\
~.-.."~
i"- t
.~
''''"
\,f
'!. t
vI
"1:..-000 ....
I
1'-::
--.
...Autumn
. Grove
1, Park
.-
i'
,
i
v
.
.
~
.
.
Langton
Lak~
Park
..
"
.
.
.
,~
i
.
!
!
i
.
,,-
i
J
",
!
---
l
.
i OUCJOl,'
,
.
!
~-
!
lA 1>.....
" "
~.,f "...,.-1
-"
i.
a ~
,~
J
, \1
). '\
i \
N . \'\
&" , --'
H " Ql/I
,~' ;fjo.~-
i......-;.. .
\.., /--E;, .c.<I...-....
, ..~ . . 'Parks and
If I I
" '_n Recreation
ac..6. -- Office
~ ;-.. .
. ..
J
.
-"'.. ;
1
I !
. i
I'
i
j
1
r
,~"
.
~...;._- --..
/.. .\ #.. . f' / ·
./: ..... 'VtF j,~ Ladyslipper
;~', ~ / '\ ~ ._park__
...' i, I' . . .
.' ," P'-I'
# ,..~.. \. :- It "
~ '\.... r..-_I""t>OO-~
~ ~""... "I u .. !
'\,0 r ;, I..-t...... 1. ~. k
'~Ow ~.c~... 1 5 C'f -~; IIU'!'
/ ./ a:;So " I 00..00<..... . ~
,/!/ Hi~s ~,- ~! ! Mapleview
~,f~ ~ ~Par~ k "'__u two :; Park :; :;
~/ .....~~ <'c\". '.....AO"flol Aot
, ..::..,., l~ ....\. ~
~ .- :; ~
.;( ~
,~"
-,
"
valleY
Park
I.~
!
~
'.
.
{.J'I
!-[
"--..
-'
~...
,:-
,
u
~.: r
, !
! ~gIIIlI"
, -
,
~-
.~
'.
;
I
I:. I
'.
"M
il~ I
I . !
,-L.
.
-..f
....
Ir~\..;'nlll..
'"'
'"':1
"h
.
:
.,-
,
I ~--
If-
~
,~
""'"'u_
,
~I
~i
i<
5
~I
I
.. J
~
I .~
f
4
,.
J
l
.
-,.
doltonlail
-~
:; .. .. Park
!
,.
i 'i ~ ! Veleran,,!,~.
rI '~! ~ L i 'i P:rk ~ '. i
! "I l~oward Rosev~le ~
i! l - ~ohnson Skating Owasso
- , , - ",--,/. ~park .,.... . I
-------.----_ - ...,nllU;, , '1 Ballfields
t :; :; :; :( ... _ _ -__~
~ -oM ..!! ~Iol "I. t It C" _'. ~, --.-
"" .' . f !, ." . I -,. ~
.~ ! , i! i Ro\lpeprkook' Pocahon i I' 1 " ! Centr;;1 8~..n
0-""'.' .>'( ar Park (ou, ~.>'( I~w
I' _...\~.-ooq .... -...- ~(M' ... ~ --..
\ \ ,., WillowP'ona~ i" . ,
--., j,......JOT ... ~ ; A r .~ (_/.."""-"'StJ 1_ i j!
/. . ; \"..-:. ", f l I! Park V ~_ ,. .., ,..:.:~
"'.i. '\ ."........,... ~
.~ I ' 1
~\..
;
,
L Q:IV<<"'"
5"a..-rr_
&:--;:
~j~
Par~
~"
CI:-"'rr_
~
.
!
.: ruuuc:t llfI'
,,-..~
..
,-
. Cedirt,olm !'
Golf Co~rse 1
,...
--~
.......
-}~ I;
,
.
_!
6
! i 1/
i.__U.
Evergreeri .
UDOOWPa~ l"-:....- !
A... s.u~ I iiL...~
(; ,-.. I, ' !:.~ . ~I~
I . ._.. '>OM ~"-
... -_I~ if :; i
, ',. I
i.l i.II LU. .::::..
.... ~ i :
10 j'" I
,.'
-
i
I
,
, l
'?-~:""-:-
-
,,~
~
~,-
-.
..
& ~ e.
l I
::-'I~
..
_u_
c
~
~
~I
~I
~I
7
8
9
~..
"!!.'O
~
p-
i
Proposed Pathways 2002
L
I -...,.
"
'UD
-'._-
~I
,~
.
,_u
~
.
"
1
i
,
,,'I-'
,
-'\ /~
Central, I " ~
.~ q
ark :or ~..." ~~ .~
/1 ~,c()Uoo'ty
~ ~:; 1:-
MlU; "t:: ........000-000'
i
1,1,
,f. .
.. "
...J ;;. """'"",n...
Pa." , _' _.....,.._. __
I Central' parJ
I
..
i
!
!
.
~ Woodhill
~. parx I
" LLLU.J~_~,
I
I
,
.
,
I
h
-'i~-~---//'
::--n:-
_.
,
Nature Center r Ooutp.ur
......c.wu....L/II
~
~
/
.. "
'.
.1III....1Il'
'.
."
~-
..
.~-
i .~
-.
..
. ~-
,
Roseville ''''::.:.:. .. :
. " II
GymnastIcs! -...... ~ 11
Center ,
-,"'--..
!
r
1-
.
Concordia~ 1
... ~Park I=-.... ~! ...
/ -'
.
vi
..
:Aot
l
,-
.
i
,
~
..
"
"
.
--.--""-~
-~..
"...--",
.
..
~
'..
: il'
1 I
J
1
i
.
_.~
p-
.
~,
--
..
:.::..-..
.--
-..
,
I i
i
~
,
-
~I'","
I
I
~
-.
_n
,
.. Lexington
. Park
, .~
.~
.
;
j~
~
..
! '-
~-,
. ~........
Maytfower
Park ..
'-'
Villa I
~ec..,. I ~
.O'f .., ~.j
....,.. .../
.~ ....0..
.............. Park .jl- \
.... "/UfA" .,.
.....A..~_ -
'" ~-
., .,r a
a~_ A"l .........
· Reservoir'"
-:;"', Woods ~\.
t:. I ..~ rrr A" ,/'.J.-
j! "''''''''000
--.
-.
..
..
.,.000"'" -"
,-
l~
...........: :;- !-..
I .. !..._ .~, '.
! Bruce ':"';' ~_. ! pionee:Jj1 eservoor Woods
.... I -"'>'( k ~
Russell..... .._ ! Pa~
!: Park t .IIOV..._ k .. :; A" t;
....n... It" ..
-.
-.
..
: Off Leash Dog Park
~.
H~U I
"
, -
Acorn
Park
Disc
,~ Golf
'I ! '~ourst
! ~ ;!. f" ..
i.AI2.......,. ;
{ . ',' , . .
: !
..
~
'l '
Ifl
.~~i !
.,., I,
I~r'
r",,";..
"~
.-:...<,. 1
-
-
'......
. ,
, "
.... I.
I amarackl -..:;
I .~
Park ,_
. .~
~- i MateriOn\'.
It 5'1 I Park
, I'
l II!
A...- _"""A ~ I,: ~A
~ !~. ~
S~"'::-'4~~4_ -
~ ~Y,.
i · 7"1'
, I! ,I
!
..
. ,
! '.41 I
:
_II!
,
i
l ,~
'~
---~
- -
~
\ ,
v . ....., I ,. ',.
._..--....,.. '- _/. _a' ,,'
'. '- -- ~- ~'" ,...~
\ '.,,"" . p- .~~; .. .
-~ ! ......,~ o;--.~
..-_ '.(i ~I :;
,_",...4
-
---
11
~I
-,
~I
~I
~I
~I
13
12
1J
15
16
51
17
18
-
-
~I
19
.
---
----
-.
,
it
I
, .
'. i
I I
"
-'':"
..
l
1
,
,
~~.
).. I'
>. .
"'\J..~
.
'..
.
.
,
3
I
it
.,of.....
~
20
A
~
B
~"
,
c
~-:.I)
o
i
.!Av
,
..
E
i~}O
F
;4.,:)0
G
2'!oO
i
H
:; 10Ml
.:1'140
J
--
'SiO
K
~
L
i "60
,
Roseville Public Works, Environment and
Transportation Commission
Agenda Item
Date: May 22, 2007
Item No: 8
Item Description: Discussion of June 26, 2007, Agenda Items
. Development Review Process
. Relationship Between Technology & Infrastructure
Recommended Action:
Set an agenda for the June 26, 2007, Public Works Commission meeting.