Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 5/21/07 <br /> <br />ITEM: <br /> <br />Department Approval: <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />Agenda Section: <br /> <br />Item Description: Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 408 of City Code Relating to <br />Fertilizer and Pesticide Use Discussion of Modifications to the Fertilizer Ordinance <br /> <br />Background: The Public Works, Environment, and Transportation Commission began studying <br />the present Fertilizer Ordinance for possible updating in mid 2006. Members felt additional <br />language should be added regarding the use of pesticides in the City, and the public should be <br />notified as to where pesticides have been applied. <br /> <br />The City Attorney offered that the City is limited by State Statute as to what can be regulated. <br />State Statute only allows cities to regulate signage. With this information, the Commission asked <br />that language be drafted to modify the fertilizer ordinance to regulate and require warning <br />signage for commercial and certain non-commercial applicators. The Commission also <br />supported updating other areas of the fertilizer ordinance. The ordinance name should include <br />pesticides, and the ordinance is out of date with current statute limiting the use of phosphorus in <br />fertilizer content. <br /> <br />The Commission also recommends increasing the buffer from water resources from the current <br />10 feet to 50 feet, which is more consistent with watershed district management plans. Attached <br />are the proposed amending ordinance, the final ordinance and the ordinance summary. <br /> <br />The PWETC also is recommending staff work on an educational effort to familiarize the <br />community of these changes, as well as the benefits of protecting our water resources. Staff will <br />be working with the Watershed Districts and the Soil and Water Conservation District in an <br />effort to educate residents on how they can help and what tools and resources are available to <br />them. <br /> <br />The Council discussed these changes at its May 14,2007, meeting. No revisions were requested <br />at that time. <br /> <br />Financial Implications: There is minimal cost in implementing this ordinance change and <br />educational effort. The City is required under NPDES Phase II Storm Water regulations to have <br />an educational program in place for protection of surface waters. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council consider approval of the proposed <br />changes to the Fertilizer Ordinance. <br />