Laserfiche WebLink
June 8, 2007 <br />Page 2 <br />seems viable, Ruth wants to remain on the property. <br />It is all well and good for opponents of any project to want to look back on the <br />good old days, when fields, farms and open spaces were plentiful, and to bemoan this <br />project, or any project for that matter, as being "too big," but the facts are clear: <br />1. Ruth Partridge needs to find a new home - hopefully a new home in the <br />development proposed by United Properties. <br />2. This property is guided for higher density, and the proposed project will <br />meet the community's needs for this type of housing. <br />3. United Properties is a thoughtful, responsible and experienced developer <br />of this type of residential community within the City of Roseville and <br />elsewhere. <br />4. While affecting the neighbors, as any development would, this project has <br />been designed to provide as gentle a transition from single-family homes <br />to commercial properties as is reasonably possible. <br />5. The City Planner has recommended approval of the project, and. his report <br />to the Planning Commission states his unbiased reasons for approval. <br />On behalf of Ruth Partridge, lifelong resident of the City of Roseville, we <br />respectfully request that City Council approve the development proposed by United <br />Properties. <br />Thank you for your consideration of our request. <br />Sincerely, <br />John B. Winston <br />JBW/krm <br />