My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0716
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2007 1:48:05 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 1:42:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/16/2007
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~y Counc~i Stu. Y Session <br />Monday, July 16, 2007 <br />gage 5 <br />and annual basis. Mr. Johnson noted the emotional support ex- <br />pressed by residents in their recent comments during the Imag- <br />ine Roseville 2025 process. <br />Mr. Johnson repeatedly recognized the difficult balance re- <br />quired and challenges of the City Council in meeting every de- <br />partment's needs; however, he also recognized the apparent <br />public support and ownership for the City's park system and <br />their desire for it to improve and not deteriorate. <br />Mr. Johnson, from a business perspective, opined that the cur- <br />rent equipment was about to compromise the integrity of the <br />business; and asked that the department's capital stock be <br />viewed as an enterprise, and not be politically driven. <br />Mr. Johnson advised that it was the consensus of the Parks and <br />Recreation Commission that those three (3) options were what <br />needed to be considered by the City Council in order to main- <br />tain existing structures, equipment and facilities. Mr. Johnson <br />opined that it was also the consensus of the Commission that <br />what was needed for the Roseville park system was to improve <br />"branding" consistencies and maintain existing facilities; that <br />new structures weren't needed, including the proposed commu- <br />nity center. Mr. Johnson advised that the public's message dur- <br />ing the visioning process was loud and clear that the City <br />needed to take care of what we have. <br />Discussion among Commissioners and Councilmembers in- <br />cluded: the concept of an endowment fund and discretionary <br />appropriation of such a fund; potential voter support of a bond <br />issue and removing pressures from other areas with confined <br />uses of bond funds; and vociferous and consistent public com- <br />ments and perceptions of the deterioration of existing equip- <br />ment, structures and/or facilities. <br />Councilmember Kough suggested the possible sale some golf <br />course property for town home development as a way to gener- <br />ate funds. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.