pf_03655 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

C 1 ~~ - ~~ - °~ _ _ _~ . _. _ _ ~ ` ';he intersectic i , - e ' .._:yighborhoc ~ ~ _ c er Bale Si ~_ ~ _ _ . , - ~, c-plains - ~~ .; c ' d ~ male Street 13s ~ _ C SvLCLi possible. Txi aS Pa~~,sr c ,d 11C}w the C1iy t ~ - v t ;~E,~~~ around ,pie CC7rner. ., e Efta. 646 Pinevie Court. said this i. 1 " ate~-sec ~ _ col buses. C z _ . 3: ay be redesgnec " J for easier' s move 7 ~_ . b ~ ' ° explained _ ire ~_ v - = ',city or county} t_# ,;{idea the intersection. ' -~ 1 :fen, ~1I ~ ~ Drive, expressed conce for i 1ic safe . rences and ~~~: c ~ ;-n. There are t - to l (} deer in this area. A fenc ~ .~ r ~ :er. _ ~ ~ - ~ :,°-,~ber the big deer move. nt is between 4.3Qp ~ ` S::;Op] 1~he de_ ~~ o the r `, ~ f way. ~ fence will ~e ' ., `ve run problems. T ° E~~-ea is a heavd- fc _ _ `°~ . Tl~e ~ ~ ' orhood is at least SG ro c - ° _ _ - ~ SC}, requiri ~ Imes o ` ` _. r'ale Thomas P~.~.. e-~ ~ sd ghat nothing pi.,~~~_ ~ ::; ~' ~e current owner from installing a fend, t„ 1-le explained at vision with cond ' i _ans will not be detrimental. to the public. s~-1= J - s- ~ ~ ~ ~bdivision an,l e ~a is troubling. The Cc emission : ~.ould make a f ing that t11e lot is ~t.dable as .l °~ ;gular, b_ this is not a reason to grant a variance request. There should be n _x o:_~~r variances on this s_~e . _:-:-bet Wakeman agreed. She recommended the need for a pert:: _ fence. Member lac ~.;rty agreed with. both. 1-Ie expressed concern with the size ofth~ ~, ~.-cable area; he is not sure what can be built on this lot. Member 13oerigter expressed concern that the next owner will not be aware of the Commission concerns. Member White supports the efforts because the city has policies and regulations in place to make this compatible, The owner (currents could do many fence and landscape improvements. Ike encouraged the Commission to look forward to a unique design, without further restrictions. RCA P~'3655(082205) - Paffe 9 of 12