Laserfiche WebLink
5.2 <br />5.3 <br />5.5 <br />e, In revi€~ 1 ._-, ? ;truc~tre h . ~ <br />parcel, 't = ~ ~ -u ~~LL~ '----~ .. been de -~ ~~ -east <br />portion. c ' ~ ` ~ -;~uld have esta'~'_ ~d'_r ~ west p ~ ~ re .r <br />yard. <br />c+ (• • f., < nn n ~ , _ ~Ota~ f~a'.,w ` ,.., f4 .. f~R. ~n„T,:. " - ~t,.l.T,~,~T . _ ~~j'k1 <br />s <~~R ~-. ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~;;.:ved ~ -:; _ _ ~ '~, c~nc ~et~, - -_ ~r hT "~ ~ ©T° <br />~ - ..r,.. <E ";l ' ~ ,>.i ' ;us c~xt c lit ~r~ pearcc ' ~ E°.~_ ~ee_ `: '?° , of <br />t.~~ _='lt t ~~ ~rrcelsize. <br />a, 7 ' ;tnxet~~re (hour =-~ - ` - - ~ lies on a . , " <br />- ~ _ _ _ - by 80 cor =a`- - ., } s.__. ft , l ' >t has a ~ <br />b. The ex -__g ~ -_:_ ,~ _ ~ is 1,306 s€1. ft., the attached garage is 405 sq. ft., <br />the ~-r~.':~ is 1.32 s ~ tt., the driveway is estimated at 872 sq. ft., and the sidewalk is <br />esr ~„~__~ °d at 150 sq. ff., for a total existing impervious calculation of 2,865 sd. ft. <br />ee Tl~e proposal would increase tl~e principal structure fo .~~-rnt size from. 1,711 sq. <br />ft. to 2,079 sq. ft. {368 sq. ft. addition} and elimina`: `' ~ ?'' scl. ft. patio for a <br />total proposed impervio~:zs coverage mount of 3,11, ~, /h amount does not <br />exceed the 3,600 scl. ft. afforded the property. <br />Pre-e .~ . ,.. ,corner lots are the mast difficult to work with when attempting to c~,: <br />within the requil-ed setbacks. That being said, the Rebmann parcel tends to be more <br />complicated due to the rambler style stnlcture and the desire of the owners to expand the <br />footprint. Also complicating matters is the fact that 1948 building permits and regulatory <br />review and approval were granted, which is much different from today's interpretation. <br />PF3653_RVBA_070605.doc- Page 3 of 6 <br />