CC_Minutes_2007_0820 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Minnesota emphasized the importance of the area around Langton Lake as an oasis for migratory songbirds. 5. The GUAR on Page 6~ fails to identify any scenic views. Documents supplied during the Twin Lakes litigation capture many scenic views. To those who enter this park, located in a first-ring suburb and only blocks from Rosedale and Interstate 35W, all the natural views unencumbered by man made artifacts are scenic. This area is a beautiful haven and should be described and preserved as such. 6. Although there was much discussion of the noise, light, and air pollution that would be created by the increased levels of traffic from the unnecessary and ill-conceived proposed Twin Lakes Parkway during previous litigation, an analysis of that environmental impact on the wildlife and residents in the area is non-existent. It is almost as though in the case of the area surrounding Twin Lakes, the City Government has no interest in protecting the health, welfare and safety of the residents. 7. This is the third year of water quality monitoring of Langton Lake. Following the completion of the first two years, Langton Lake has been forwarded by the Metropolitan Council scientists to the DNR to be listed as an impaired water. As an impaired water, other regulations go into effect to safeguard the water quality and aquatic habitat and watershed. This information has not been included or even acknowledged in this AUAR. 8. As explained earlier, the significant changes to the subareas and consequent recalculation of traffic volumes takes a good deal of tune to fully analyze. However, it is known and documented that the original motivation for Twin Lakes Parkway was to create a road that would carry freeway traffic through the area to Highway 51. In the 2001 AUAR, l~~INDOT made it very clear that such a road could not enter Snelling Avenue (Highway 51) between County Road C and County Road C-2. This is still true. Since this proposed Parkway remains in place, it serves no purpose than to take traffic from the County Road C exit of 35W and distribute it into residential neighborhoods, impacting the health, safety, and welfare of those residents. Mitigation strategies for this unzlecessary traffic influx are expensive and unplanned. Although traffic signals are suggested for Lydia and Fairview, the county has no plans to widen Fairview. N[Nl~OT leas just stated in colntnents on the proposed Northwestern College expansion that if that expansion does not go forward, there would be no necessity for lights at Fairview and Lydia and there are no plans to either redo the intersection or install traffic lights. Widening the road would negatively impact the homes of residents along Fairview and expansion would be impossible beyond County Road D on Fairview. This AUAR is not an "update" nor is it complete or accurate. It is yet another thinly veiled attempt to inflict massive traffic impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhoods, jeopardizing the residents' health, safety, and welfare. It is also an obvious attempt to circumvent the "environmental review" ordered by the court and to attempt to put retail into an area where it is specifically barred by the Comprehensive Plan. 2