Laserfiche WebLink
ie I ~e €~n tyre agenCfa: a . a _ ~ Irk ; ~ ~ ~ l.J ,f~ rC~~ess ~''~ ~ ,~, C, <br />Proposed 'T'win Lakes AUAR <br />July 11, 2007 <br />Al Sands Commentary July 23, 2007 <br />The Real `Twin Lakes aster Plan: <br />June 26, 2001 Minutes: <br />Mastel moved, Maschka seconded, by resolution, to approve the final amendment of the Comprehensive Plan for the <br />Twin Lakes business Park area from "business" and "Industrial" to "Business Park" as described in the Twin Lakes <br />Master Plan dated June 26, 2001 and as amended by Council with the Scenario # 1. The amendment shall also <br />included the findings of the AUAR and mitigation plan. Roll Call, Ayes: Goedeke, Mastel, Klausing, Maschka, and <br />Kysylyczyn. Nays: none. <br />The Twin Lakes Master Plan is further identified in pages 9-11 of the document titled "Twin Lakes Master Plan", and <br />as per the map identified as Map 6, Future Land Use Scenario. <br />The Twin Lakes Master Plan, as_per the Twin Lakes Final AUAR update July 11,2007: <br />-Page 10: <br />"The AUAR update reviews three development scenarios that are consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan <br />(Figure 6.2). <br />This statement is not true. Figure 6.2 is a map showing Twin Lakes is designated as a Business Park in the <br />Comprehensive Plan. It ignores the Twin Lakes Master Plan included in the Twin Lakes Comprehensive Plan as an <br />amendment dated 6/26/01. <br />Actually, none of the three proposed scenarios are consistent with the Twin Lakes Master Plan as amended 6/26/01. <br />That is a false statement based on a false premise of what constitutes the Twin Lakes Comprehensive Plan. <br />http://webmail.aol.com/28518/aol/en-us/Mail/PrintMessage.aspx 7/23/2007 <br />