CC_Minutes_2007_0827 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4. The Twin Lakes approved AUAR, included in the Twin Lakes Comprehensive plan, only studied two scenarios-scenario 1, which the council adopted as an amendment to the Twin Lakes Master Plan, and scenario 1 a, which the Council specifically rejected on June 26,2001. There is no analysis of any other scenario(s) or "option(s)". 5. Mr. Stazk refers to a letter he requested from former development director Dennis Welsch that conflicts with the actions actually taken by Mr. Welsch. On June 26, 2001, Mr. Welsch recommended the Council adopt only one plan, scenario 1. Actions speak louder than words. The June 26, 2001 Minutes Ms. Radel's description of the June 26, 2001 appeazs accurate, and I see no conflict with my position that the Council adopted and amended the Twin Lakes Master plan .with the scenario #1. RESOLUTION 9904 This resolution describes the Comprehensive Plan Man Designation from "B" and "I" to "BP" for "Business Pazk". It goes on to state that an "Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) and Mitigation Plan have been prepazed and reviewed, linking the Twin Lakes Master Plan to the Twin Lakes AUAR approved June 26, 2001. The AUAR and Mitigation Plan approved on June 26, 2001 only studied scenario 1, and scenario 1 a. No other options were included in the AUAR study. I also point out that Resolution 9904 refers to and thereby incorporates into the resolution the following documents: • "The Twin Lakes Business Park PF 3232 ". Planning File 3232 has some 1700 pages of planning and conclusions as to what constitutes the Twin Lakes Master Plan. • "the Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council, of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment, based on findings in the 3