Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Boryczka <br />Page 4 <br />The plan does not meet MPCA REQUIREMENTS because the plan does not include <br />pretreatment. <br />6. MPCA has a Major Design Elements section for guidance on preparing vegetation and <br />landscape management plans and an Operations and Maintenance (O & M) section for <br />guidance preparing an O & M plan. MPCA highly recommends that deep rooted plants <br />such as prairie grass be used, because they increase the infiltration capacity of the <br />underlying soils. <br />However, infiltration facilities can be covered with permeable topsoil and planted with <br />grass to match the surrounding landscape. If regular grass is installed, the underlying <br />soils will not receive the increased infiltration capacity provided by deep rooted plants <br />and the City's O & M costs may be higher. <br />A vegetation plan, landscape management plan or O & M plan was not available during <br />our review. TEI understands that a landscape plan is required as a condition for final plat <br />approval. TEI believes the City of Roseville should carefully consider the type of <br />vegetation to be installed and who will maintain the vegetation in the Bioretention <br />facility, which is to be on private property in a city easement. The Plan shows that sand, <br />salt and debris from the street will be deposited on top of the facility by stormwater that <br />will flow down the proposed concrete spillway. If grass is installed, the street debris will <br />create maintenance problems for the home owners because it will be going onto their <br />yard. The city should consider this impact during their review. <br />7. The MPCA has other recommendations for infiltration practices that the plan may not <br />meet including: <br />a. Impervious area construction should be completed and pervious areas established <br />with dense and healthy vegetation prior to introduction of stormwater into an <br />infiltration facility. <br />b. Infiltration facilities should be designed to handle the smaller, more frequent <br />rainfall events. Stormwater associated with the larger rainfall events should <br />bypass these facilities (off-line configuration where water quality volume is <br />diverted (flow splitting) to the infiltration facilities). The plan has no bypass; all <br />stormwater enters the facility. <br />8. MPCA states that minimum setback requirements are REQUIRED by the Minnesota <br />Department of Health (MDH) for the design and location of infiltration practices. <br />The plan does not meet MDH REQUIREMENTS because it has the infiltration practice <br />within 10 feet of a property line and it may be too close to other facilities. <br />T:\Projects\Gary Boryczka\]tr to Gary 8-27-07.doc <br />Engineering and Environmental Solutions <br />